UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant  
                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material under Rule14a-12§14a-12

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:

0-11.


LOGO

           LOGOHUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES NOTICE OF 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


Letter to Our Stockholders

 

 

 

March 20, 2023

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

On behalf of the Board of Directors and management team of Huntington Ingalls Industries, I would like to invite you to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We will hold our annual meeting virtually, exclusively by live webcast, on Tuesday, May 2, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. You will be able to attend and participate in the annual meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions prior to and during the meeting.

The accompanying Notice of

Annual Meeting

And Proxy Statement



Letter to Our Stockholders

March 20, 2018

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

On behalf of the Board of Directors and management team of Huntington Ingalls Industries, I would like to invite you to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We will meet on Wednesday, May 2, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, at our corporate headquarters located at the Herbert H. Bateman Virginia Advanced Shipbuilding and Carrier Integration Center (VASCIC), 2401 West Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 23607. We are looking forward to your responses on the proposals included in the accompanying proxy statement.

The accompanying Notice of 2018 2023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement describe the matters on which you, as a stockholder, may vote at the annual meeting, and include details of the business to be conducted at the meeting.

LOGO

As a way to conserve natural resources and reduce annual meeting costs, we are electronically distributing proxy materials as permitted under rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Many of you will receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials via the Internet. You can also request mailed paper copies if preferred.you prefer. You can expedite delivery and reduce our mailing expenses by confirming in advance your preference for electronic delivery of future proxy materials. For more information on how to take advantage of this cost-saving service, please see page 1314 of the proxy statement.

If you plan to attend the annual meeting virtually via live webcast, you must follow the instructions contained in the Notice and on pages 11 (for record stockholders), 12 (for beneficial stockholders) and 101 of the proxy statement.

Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, I encourage you to vote your shares in advance. Stockholders can submit their votes over the Internet at the web address included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you received a proxy card, you can submit your votes over the Internet at the web address included in the proxy card, by telephone through the number included in the proxy card, or by signing and dating your proxy card and mailing it in the prepaid and addressed envelope.

Thank you for your interest in and support of Huntington Ingalls Industries. I look forward to seeing you at the annual meeting.HII.

Sincerely,

 

 

LOGOLOGO

ADM Thomas B. FargoAdmiral Kirkland H. Donald

U.S. Navy (Ret.)

Chairman of the Board


Notice of 20182023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

4101 Washington Avenue

Newport News, Virginia 23607

 

  DATE AND TIME

  

Wednesday,Tuesday, May 2, 2018,2023, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time

  PLACE Herbert H. Bateman Virginia Advanced Shipbuilding and Carrier Integration Center (VASCIC), 2401 West Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 23607

Virtually at https://meetnow.global/MKKD465

There is no physical location for the annual meeting.

  ITEMS OF BUSINESS     

Elect ten11 directors

   

Approve the company’s executive compensation on an advisory basis

   Select the frequency of future advisory approvals of executive compensation on an advisory basis

Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for 20182023

   

Consider a stockholder proposal to enable stockholders to take action by written consent,requesting that HII disclose on its website an annual report of HII’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures, if properly presented at the annual meeting

    

Transact any other business that properly comes before the annual meeting

  RECORD DATE

 

  Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 8, 2018,2023, are entitled to vote at the annual meeting.meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof.
  PROXY VOTING  It is important you vote your shares so they are counted at the annual meeting. You can vote your shares over the Internet at the web address included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and included in the proxy card (if you received a proxy card), by telephone through the number included in the proxy card (if you received a proxy card), or by signing and dating your proxy card (if you received a proxy card) and mailing it in the prepaid and addressed envelope.

 

 

LOGO

LOGO

Charles R. Monroe, Jr.

Corporate Vice President,

Associate General Counsel and Secretary

March 20, 20182023

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 2, 20182023: The Notice of 20182023 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, and 2017the 2022 Annual Report and the form of proxy card are available as of today’s date, March 20, 2018,2023, at www.envisionreports.com/HII.

Virtual Meeting Format: The 2023 annual meeting will be conducted virtually by live webcast. You will be able to attend the annual meeting, as well as vote and submit questions during the meeting, by visiting https://meetnow.global/MKKD465 and entering your control number. Please refer to the additional logistical details beginning on page 101 of the accompanying proxy statement for additional information on how to participate in the annual meeting.

The meeting will begin promptly at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. If you encounter difficulties accessing the virtual meeting, please call the technical support number 1-888-724-2416.


  Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.2023 Notice and Proxy Statement  


Proxy Statement—Table of Contents

 

1

20182023 Proxy Statement Summary

1
10General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting
 910 

Items of Business to be Considered at the Annual Meeting

 910 

Appointment of Proxy Holders

 910 

Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

 911 

Record Date and Voting

 1013 

Quorum, Vote Required and Method of Counting

 1113 

Item 1—Proposal to ElectElect Directors

 1213 

Item 2—Proposal to Approve Executive Compensation on an Advisory Basis

 12

Item 3—Proposal to Select the Frequency of Future Advisory Approvals of Executive Compensation on an Advisory Basis

14
 12

Item 4—3—Proposal to Ratify Appointment of Our Independent Auditors

 12

Item  5—Stockholder Proposal to Enable Stockholders to Take Action by Written Consent

14
 Item 4—Stockholder Proposal Requesting that HII Disclose on its Website an Annual Report of HII’s Direct and Indirect Lobbying Activities and Expenditures
12 

14

Important Reminder of Effect of Not Casting Your Vote if You Are a Street Name Stockholder

 1314 

Soliciting and Tabulating Votes

 1314 

Electronic Access to Proxy Statement and Annual Report

 1315 

Householding Information

13

16

Governance of the Company

 1516 

Overview of Corporate Governance

 1516 

Responsibilities of the Board of Directors

 1517 

Criteria for Board Membership

 1518 

Director Nomination Process

 17

Majority Vote Director Resignation Policy

19
 18

Stockholders Right to Nominate Proxy Access Nominees

 1920 

Director Independence

 20 

Board Leadership Structure

 2021 

Board Committee Functions and Membership

 2124 

Board Structure

 2224 

Executive Sessions ofNon-Employee Directors

 2224 

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

 2327 Board and Committee Oversight of Cybersecurity

27Board and Committee Oversight of Sustainability
27Board and Committee Evaluations

 2427 Director Education

28Policy Against Hedging and Pledging Company Securities

 2428 

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

 24

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

28
 25

Meetings and Attendance

 25

Indemnification

28
 Indemnification
25
29 

Communications and Company Documents

 2629 

Communications and Company Documents

 2629 Future Stockholder Proposals and Nominations of Directors

Future Stockholder Proposals and Nominations of Directors

31
 Sustainability
26
 31Board Oversight
31Key Stakeholders
32Sustainability Focus Areas

34

The Board of Directors

28

40

Director Compensation

 3440 

Director Compensation Program

 3441 

20172022 Director Compensation Table

35

42

Executive Compensation

 36

Introduction

42
 Introduction
36 

42

Named Executive Officer Biographies

 3644 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 3865 

Compensation Committee Report

 5866 

Executive Compensation Tables

 5985 Pay versus Performance

90

Audit Committee Matters

 7890 

Audit Committee Report

 7891 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 7991 

Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policies and Procedures

79

92

Stock Ownership Information

 8092 

Stock Ownership of Officers and Directors

 8093 

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

81
94Item 1—Proposal to Elect Ten11 Directors82
95Item 2—Proposal to Approve Executive Compensation on an Advisory Basis83
Item 3—Proposal to Select the Frequency of Future Advisory Approvals of Executive Compensation on an Advisory Basis96 84
Item 4—3—Proposal to Ratify the Appointment of Independent Auditors85
Item 5—Stockholder Proposal to Enable Stockholders to Take Action by Written Consent97 86Item 4—Stockholder Proposal Requesting that HII Disclose on its Website an Annual Report of HII’s Direct and Indirect Lobbying Activities and Expenditures

101

Other Information for Stockholders

 89

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

101
 Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
89 

101

Attending the Annual Meeting

 89102 

Related Party Transactions

89
104Annex A—Definitions ofNon-GAAP Financial Measures and Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures92
 

i


 

20182023 Proxy Statement Summary

 

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all the information you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

 

 

  Annual Meeting Information

 

 

 

  Date and Time:  

  

 

May 2, 2018,2023, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time

 

  Place:

  

 

Herbert H. Bateman Virginia Advanced Shipbuilding and Carrier Integration CenterVirtually at https://meetnow.global/MKKD465. There is no physical location for the annual meeting.

(VASCIC)

2401 West Avenue

Newport News, Virginia 23607

 

  Record Date:

  

 

March 8, 20182023

 

  Voting:

  

 

Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share

 

  Admission:

  

 

To attend the meeting, in person, you will need to follow the instructions included on page 89pages 11, 12 and 101

 

 

  Items to be Voted at the Annual Meeting

 

 

   

Board Vote

Recommendation

 

Page Reference

  (for more information)  

    

Board Vote

Recommendation

 

Page Reference

(for more information)

1.

 

 

Elect ten directors

 

 

 

FOR

 

 

 

82

 

  Elect 11 directors FOR 94

2.

 

 

Approve the company’s executive compensation on an advisory basis

 

 

 

FOR

 

 

 

83

 

  Approve the company’s executive compensation on an advisory basis FOR 95

3.

 

 

Select the frequency of future advisory approvals of executive compensation on an advisory basis

 

 

 

FOR ONE YEAR

 

 

 

84

 

  Ratify the appointment of our independent auditors FOR 96

4.

 

 

Ratify the appointment of our independent auditors

 

 

 

FOR

 

 

 

85

 

  Consider a stockholder proposal requesting that HII disclose on its website an annual report of HII’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures, if properly presented at the annual meeting AGAINST 97

5.

 

 

Consider a stockholder proposal to enable stockholders to take action by written consent, if properly presented at the meeting

 

 

 

AGAINST

 

 

 

86

 

 

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    1

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    1

 


20182023 Proxy Statement Summary

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (“HII”, the “company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) is a global, all-domain defense partner, building and delivering the world’s most powerful, survivable naval ships and technologies that safeguard America’s seas, sky, land, space, and cyber. For more than a century, our Ingalls Shipbuilding segment in Mississippi and Newport News Shipbuilding segment in Virginia have built more ships in more ship classes than any other U.S. naval shipbuilder, making us America’s largest shipbuilder. Our Mission Technologies segment delivers high-value engineering and technology solutions to enable multi-domain distributed operations in the government and commercial markets. Our mission is to deliver the world’s most powerful ships and all domain solutions in service of the nation, creating the advantage for our customers to protect peace and freedom around the world.

In 2022, HII delivered stable execution in a challenging operating environment. We delivered or re-delivered four critical assets to the U.S. Navy, including the amphibious transport dock Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28), the delivery of guided-missile destroyer Lenah Sutcliffe Higbee (DDG 123), the delivery of Virginia-class submarine Montana (SSN 794) and the re-delivery of Los Angeles-class submarine USS Helena (SSN 725) after its completion of maintenance and modernization. While we executed on current program milestones, we also were awarded contracts for new work totaling $9.3 billion in 2022, resulting in backlog of $47.1 billion at year-end, representing years of future work. At Mission Technologies, the integration of Alion Science and Technology (“Alion”), acquired in 2021, is substantially complete, and the segment achieved significant programmatic wins that would not have been possible without the capabilities added from Alion. HII made meaningful progress in 2022 while aggressively managing through labor market shortages, accelerating inflation and continuing supply chain pressures.

 

 

 

Corporate Governance Highlights

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (“HII” the “company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is committed to high standards of corporate governance best practices, which we believe promote the long-term interests of stockholders, strengthen accountability of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) and management and build public trust in the company. Highlights of our corporate governance practices include:

 

Board

Board

  Structure and  

Governance

   Diverse independent Board comprised entirelywith mix of independent directors, except for our Chief Executive Officertenures
   All standing Board committees comprised of independent directors
   Executive sessionRegular executive sessions of independent directors, without management present, at each regularly scheduled Board meetingand committee meetings
   Independentnon-executive Chairman of the Board
   AnnualRobust annual Board and committee self-assessmentself-evaluation process
   Director term limits
   Mandatory director retirement age
   Limits on outside public company board service by directors to prevent overboarding
Active stockholder outreach and engagement
   

Stockholder

Rights

   Annual election of all directors
   Director resignation policy if more votes are withheld than castMajority vote requirement for any directorelection of directors in uncontested elections
   Ability of eligible stockholders to include their own director nominees in our proxy materials (proxy access)
   Ability of stockholders to call a special meeting of stockholders
  No supermajority voting requirements
Annual advisory vote on named executive officer compensation
 No stockholder rights plan (poison pill)
   
Stock

Stock

Ownership

   StockRobust stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements fornon-employee directors and executivesexecutive officers
   Clawback policy for all performance-based compensation
   Prohibition on directors, executive officers and executivescertain other employees hedging or pledging our common stock

 

 

 

Stockholder Engagement

We believe stockholder outreach and engagement is a corporate governance best practice. Accordingly, we actively engage with our investors so management and the Board can receive stockholder perspectives on matters that are important to stockholders and assess emerging issues

2    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


2023 Proxy Statement Summary

that may shape our governance practices and enhance our corporate disclosures. We strive for a collaborative approach to stockholder engagement is an essential elementand value the variety of strong corporate governance. Accordingly, managementstockholder perspectives we receive. Management and, in some cases, members of the Board actively engagesengage with our investors through telephonic meetings,in-person meetings and email to understand theirinvestor perspectives on our company, including our strategy, performance, corporate governance matterspractices and executive compensation. During 2017,2022 and early 2023, management requested meetings withcontacted the corporate governance teams of our largest institutional stockholders, and other interested stockholderscollectively representing approximately 50% of our outstanding shares, and met with those stockholders representing approximately 18% ofthat accepted our outstanding shares.meeting invitations. We are committed to understanding the perspectives of our stockholders and responding as appropriate.

2    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


2018 Proxy Statement Summary

The following sections of this proxy statement summary describe the matters on which our stockholders will vote at the 20182023 annual meeting of stockholders.

 

 

 

ELECT TEN11 DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Director Nominees

The Board is asking you to elect, forone-year terms ending in 2019,2024, the ten11 nominees for director named below, each of whom is currently serving as a member of the Board. Detailed information about this proposal can be found beginning on page 94.

The following table provides summary information about the nominees for director, including their names, ages and occupations, whether they are independent directors under the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the corporate governance listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), and the Board committees on which they currently serve. The directorsEach director will be elected by a plurality vote, but any director who receives a greaterif the number of votes “withheld”shares voted in favor of such director exceeds the number of shares voted against such director.

Stephen R. Wilson, a current member of the Board and Chairman of the Audit Committee, will retire from his or her election than votes “for” such election must tenderthe Board effective at the time of the 2023 annual meeting.

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 Board Committees

Name

 Age 

Director

Since

 Principal Occupation   Independent  
Director
    A       C       CS       F       GP   
         

Augustus L. Collins

 65 2016 Chief Executive Officer of MINACT, Inc. ü ü  ü  
         

Leo P. Denault

 63 2022 Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Corporation ü ü   ü 
         

Kirkland H. Donald

 69 2017 Chairman of the Board ü 

 

 

 

 ü ü 

 

         

Victoria D. Harker

 58 2012 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tegna, Inc. ü  CH  ü 
         

Frank R. Jimenez

 58 2022 General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, GE HealthCare ü  ü   ü
         

Christopher D. Kastner

 59 2022 President and Chief Executive Officer of Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.      
         

Anastasia D. Kelly

 73 2011 Senior Advisor to the Chair and Executive Director of Client Relations of DLA Piper ü  ü   ü
         

Tracy B. McKibben

 53 2018 Founder and Chief Executive Officer of MAC Energy Advisors LLC ü    ü ü
         

Stephanie L. O’Sullivan

 63 2021 Independent Business Consultant ü 

 

 

 

 CH ü 

 

         

Thomas C. Schievelbein

 69 2011 Retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Brink’s Company ü ü   CH 
         

John K. Welch

 73 2015 Retired President and Chief Executive Officer of Centrus Energy Corp. ü ü       CH

CH = Chairperson

A =  Audit Committee

C  = Compensation Committee

CS  =  Cybersecurity Committee

F  = Finance Committee

GP = Governance and Policy Committee

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    3


2023 Proxy Statement Summary

Board Composition

Our Board continues to reflect a diverse and highly engaged group of directors with a wide range of skills, experiences, attributes and perspectives, which continue to evolve. Four of our 11 director nominees have joined the Board in the last five years. The following charts and graphs highlight the current composition of our Board:

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

4    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


2023 Proxy Statement Summary

Director Experience and Skills

As part of the Board’s continuous director succession process, implemented through the Governance and Policy Committee, the committee regularly assesses the experience, skills, qualifications and attributes of Board members relative to the appropriate mix of these qualities the committee believes the Board hisneeds to effectively oversee HII’s business and execution of its strategy. While each Board member possesses a broad range of experience and skills, the Board believes each director has particular strategic strengths that he or her offershe brings to the Board. The following table shows the experience, skills and knowledge constituting the strategic strengths of resignation.each of our 11 director nominees.

 

Board Committees

  NameAgeOccupationIndependent
Director
ACFGP
Experience and SkillsCollinsDenaultDonaldHarkerJimenezKastnerKellyMcKibbenO’SullivanSchievelbeinWelch

 Philip M. Bilden

LOGO

 53

Chief Executive Leadership and Strategy

Experience as Chief Executive Officer of a public company or Chief Executive Officer of a private organization

 

RetiredCo-Founding Member

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

LOGO

Chief Financial Officer and Accounting

Experience as Chief Financial Officer of HarbourVest Partners, LLCpublic company or large private organization or private equity executive leadership experience

·

·

·

·

·

LOGO

Investment Strategy, Corporate Development and M&A

Experience in executive leadership of private equity, other strategic investment firm or investment bank; experience in corporate development function; or oversight leadership experience in corporate development and transactional M&A

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

LOGO

Shipbuilding and Manufacturing Operations/Leadership

Experience in executive leadership of shipyard operations or other manufacturing operations

·

·

·

LOGO

Technical Services Executive Leadership

Experience in executive leadership of technical services business organization or significant technical services leadership or customer experience

·

·

·

LOGO

Military and Government Relations

Experience as Admiral or other significant Naval career experience; significant federal government experience and relationships (e.g., Pentagon, Congress, White House); or significant military leadership role or leadership role in military associations

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

LOGO

Corporate Governance

Current member of multiple public company boards; experience as public company board chair or public company committee chair; prior member of multiple public company boards; or corporate secretary experience

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

LOGO

Aerospace & Defense Industry Knowledge

Significant direct Naval industry experience or significant direct general aerospace & defense experience

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

LOGO

Compliance, Legal and Regulatory

Experience as General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer or Chief Compliance Officer of large business organization or other significant legal or regulatory experience

·

·

·

·

·

·

LOGO

 

 Yes

Nuclear

Experience in Navy nuclear executive leadership; executive leadership of Naval nuclear shipyard operations; or oversight of nuclear operations

  l

·

 l

·

 ·

·

·

LOGO

Advanced Technology (Future Warfare) and Innovation

Experience as Chief Technology Officer or equivalent of large aerospace & defense company; Chief Technology Officer or equivalent of other large organization; or engineering/technology/innovation functional lead

·

·

·

·

LOGO

Cyber and IT Risk Management

Experience as Chief Information Officer, Chief Information Security Officer or equivalent operational experience; management experience in cyber operations; or experience on a corporate cyber risk committee

·

·

·

·

LOGO

Human Resources and Labor Relations

Experience as Chief Human Resources Officer or equivalent of a large business organization or significant human resources or labor relations experience

·

·

  Augustus L. Collins

60

Chief Executive Officer of MINACT Incorporated

Yes

l

l

  Kirkland H. Donald

64

Independent Business Consultant

Yes

l

l

  Thomas B. Fargo

69

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

Yesl

  Victoria D. Harker

53

Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Tegna, Inc.

YesCHl

  Anastasia D. Kelly

68

Co-Managing Partner of DLA Piper Americas

Yes

l

CH

  C. Michael Petters

58

President and Chief Executive Officer of Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

No

  Thomas C. Schievelbein

64

Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Brink’s Company

YeslCH

  John K. Welch

68

Retired President and Chief Executive Officer of Centrus Energy Corp.

Yesll

  Stephen R. Wilson

71

Independent Business Consultant and Retired Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of RJR Nabisco, Inc.

YesCH
  2023 Notice and Proxy Statement     

CH = Chair

5

A = Audit Committee

C = Compensation Committee

F = Finance Committee

GP = Governance and Policy Committee

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    3

 


20182023 Proxy Statement Summary

Board Composition, Qualifications and Diversity

We believe the Board is comprised of an effective mix of experience, skills and perspectives. The following charts and graphs highlight the current composition of our Board.

    Director Independence          

             LOGO

              Director Diversity          

LOGO

      Director Age Mix

LOGO

Director Experience and Skills

LOGO

4    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

VSenior Leadership Experience Finance, Accounting and Capital Markets Experience Industry Experience Manufacturing and Operations Experience Human Resources Experience Military and Government Experience Government Relations and Regulatory Experience Legal, Regulatory and Compliance Experience Technology Experience Risk Management Experience Corporate Development and Strategy Experience Global Experience


2018 Proxy Statement Summary

The Board, through the Governance and Policy Committee, considers Board succession on a continuous basis. The committee’s process includes evaluation of director attributes, including professional experience, skills, diversity, independence, tenure and age, to create a balanced Board that can effectively oversee the company’s business and execution of its business strategy.

 

 

  APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ON AN ADVISORY BASIS

The Board is asking you to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers for 2017.2022. Detailed information about this proposal can be found beginning on page 95.

Our stockholders have voted on our executive compensation, on an advisory basis, since 2012. We2012, and we have consistently received exceptionally strong stockholder support, as reflected insupport. The following table sets forth the following table:voting results for our “say-on-pay” proposal for the last five years:

 

Annual Meeting

  

2017

 

   

2016

 

   

2015

 

   

2014

 

   

2013

 

   

2012

 

   

2022

   

2021

   

2020

   

2019

   

2018

 

Votes Cast “FOR”Say-On-Pay Proposal

  

 

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

Votes Cast “FOR” Say-On-Pay Proposal*

  

 

97

  

 

97

  

 

98

  

 

98

  

 

99

* Excludes broker non-votes

Executive Compensation

We have designed our executive compensation program to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified executives, incentivize our executives to achieve business objectives, reward performance and align the interests of our executives with the interests of our stockholders and customers. The fundamental philosophy of our executive compensation program, set by the Compensation Committee of the Board, ispay-for-performance. We describehave included below our financial performance and stockholder returns in 2017.2022.

20172022 Financial Performance

StrongManaging through a challenging operating performanceenvironment in 20172022, we achieved operating successes and delivered solida consistent financial performance. TheWe have included in the following table includes several of our 20172022 financial highlights:

 

  2017  2022 Financial Highlights

  

2017 Results

($ in millions,

except per share data)

  Contract Awards

9,329

  Revenues

  $7,441

10,676

  Operating Income

  $   865

565

  Operating Margin

   11.6%

5.3

%

  Segment Operating Income*

  $   688

712

  Cash from OperationsSegment Operating Margin*

  $   814

 Free Cash Flow*

6.7

$   453

%

  Net Earnings

  $   479

 Adjusted Net Earnings*

579

$   556

  Diluted Earnings Per Share

  $10.46

14.44

  Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share*Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

  $12.14

766

  Contract Awards

Free Cash Flow*

  $8,073

 

494

Our full year revenues of $10.7 billion in 2022 increased 12.1% over 2021. Operating income was $565 million, 10.1% higher than 2021, and segment operating income* was $712 million, 4.2% higher than 2021. Diluted earnings per share of $14.44 increased 7.0% over 2021, and free cash flow* was 10.0% higher than 2021.

 

*Segment operating income, free cash flow, adjusted net earnings and adjusted diluted earnings per share arenon-GAAP

Non-GAAP financial measures. See Annex A for definitions of thesenon-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to comparable GAAP financial measures.

Our full year revenues of $7.4 billion in 2017 increased 5.3% over 2016. Operating income was $865 million and operating margin was 11.6%, compared to $858 million and 12.1%, respectively, in 2016. New contract awards in 2017 totaled $8.1 billion, resulting in a backlog of $21.4 billion at the end of the year.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    5

6    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

 


20182023 Proxy Statement Summary

 

20172022 Stockholder Returns

Our operating performance continues to drive significant returns for our stockholders. Adjusted diluted earnings per share remained constant at $12.14 per share from 2016 to 2017.HII’s total stockholder return in 2022 was 26.3%. We also increased dividends by 20%approximately 4%, from $2.10$4.60 per share in 20162021 to $2.52$4.78 per share in 2017,2022, and repurchased 1.4 million244,561 shares during 2017, continuing2022, returning $244 million to deliver on our commitment to return cash to stockholders.stockholders in 2022.

The following graph and chart show total stockholder return for HII in 20172022 compared to several benchmarksbenchmark total stockholder returns and total cash returned to stockholders in 2017,2022, respectively.

 

1-YEAR TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURN

 

RETURNED $403$244 MILLION TO

STOCKHOLDERS IN 2017                        2022

 

LOGO           LOGO

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

Our named executive officers (“NEOs”)compensation program for 2017 areeach of the individuals who served as our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our three other most highly-compensatedhighly compensated executive officers in 2017 who were serving as executive officers at the end of the year and another individual who was one of2022 (collectively, our three other most highly-compensated executive officers in 2017 but was not serving as an executive officer at the end of the year. Our compensation program for our NEOs“NEOs”) consisted primarily of the following direct compensation elements in 2017:elements:

 

Base salary, to provide a minimum fixed level of compensation.

Base salary, to provide a minimum fixed level of compensation.

 

Annual incentive awards, generally paid in cash, under our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”), to motivate our executives to achievepre-determined annual financial and operational targets that are aligned with our strategic goals.

Annual incentive awards, generally paid in cash, under our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”), to motivate our executives to achieve pre-determined annual financial and operational targets that are aligned with our strategic goals.

 

Long-term equity-based incentive awards, paid under our Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”), to promote achievement ofpre-determined three-year performance goals aligned with long-term stockholder interests.

Long-term equity-based incentive awards, paid under our Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”), to promote achievement of pre-determined three-year performance goals aligned with long-term stockholder interests.

Our executive compensation program is rounded out with certain perquisites and other executive benefits.

A significant portion of the potential compensation of our executives is at risk, and that risk increases with eachcorresponding increases in an executive’s level of responsibility. We have designed our compensation program to balance performance-based compensation over the short- and long-term to incentivize decisions and actions that promote stockholder value and focus our executives on performance that benefits our stockholders and customers, while discouraging inappropriate risk-taking behaviors.

 

6    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

*Includes $2 million subject to settlement as of December 31, 2017.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    7

 


20182023 Proxy Statement Summary

 

20172022 Total Direct Compensation Mix

Thepay-for-performance philosophy of our executive compensation program is demonstrated by the compensation mix of our NEOs. Of the three primary elements of total direct compensation, our executive compensation is heavily weighted toward the variable, performance-based elements and toward the long-term and equity-based elements, as reflected in the following graphs,charts, which set forth the percentage of total compensation corresponding to each compensation element received by our CEO and by our other NEOs collectively in the aggregate in 2017.2022.

 

CEO Compensation Mix1

LOGO 

 

Other NEONEOs Compensation Mix2

 

       LOGO

LOGOLOGO

 

(1)

Reflects the full-year compensation for Mr. Kastner, who served as Chief Operating Officer for the first two months of 2022 and as President and CEO beginning March 1, 2022. Total direct compensation does not include perquisites and other benefits.

 

(2)Average

Includes the compensation of Mr. Petters, who served as President and CEO for the first two months of 2022 and then as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board for the remainder of 2022. Chart reflects average allocation for the NEOs other than the CEO.Mr. Kastner. Total direct compensation does not include perquisites and other benefits.

Compensation Best Practices

We believe our compensation practices are aligned with and reinforce ourpay-for-performance philosophy and our related executive compensation principles.

 

What We Do the Following

 

Consideration of annual stockholder“say-on-pay” advisory vote on executive compensation.

Pay for performance compensation program heavily weighted toward variable, performance-based elements and toward long-term and equity-based elements.

Annual assessment of potential risk posed by our compensation programs.

Executive compensation “clawback” policy.

Targeted external compensation benchmarking.

Independent compensation consultant engaged by Compensation Committee.

Executive stock ownership guidelines based upon multiple of executive’s base salary.

Executive stock holding requirements, which require executives to holdone-half of their equity awards for three additional years after they vest.

What We Don’t Do the Following

 

No employment agreements for executives.

Nochange-in-control agreements for executives or related executive taxgross-up benefits.

Prohibitions against speculative transactions in our securities, pledging our securities as collateral and hedging transactions involving our securities.

No dividends or dividend equivalents paid on restricted performance stock rights during performance period.

 

 

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    7

8    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

 


20182023 Proxy Statement Summary

 

 

SELECT THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY APPROVALS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ON AN ADVISORY BASIS

The Board is asking you to select the frequency of your future advisory votes on the company’s executive compensation on an advisory basis. The Board is recommending a vote in favor of future advisory approvals of executive compensation every year.

  RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

The Board is asking you to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for 2018. 2023. Detailed information about this proposal can be found beginning on page 96.

The following table contains summary information with respect to fees billed to us in 20172022 by Deloitte & Touche for professional services.

 

 ($ in thousands)

  

20172022

 Fees Billed:

  

      Audit Fees

  

6,929

8,989

      Audit-Related Fees

  

325

524

      Tax Fees

  

36

395

      All Other Fees

  

3

2

 Total

  

7,293

9,910

 

 

CONSIDER A STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL TO ENABLE STOCKHOLDERS TO TAKE ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT,REQUESTING THAT HII DISCLOSE ON ITS WEBSITE AN ANNUAL REPORT OF HII’s DIRECT AND INDIRECT LOBBYING ACTIVITIES AND EXPENDITURES, IF PROPERLY PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

 

You are being asked to consider a stockholder proposal requesting that the Board undertake steps to enable the company’s stockholders to take action by written consentHII disclose on its website an annual report of the stockholders.HII’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures. Detailed information about this proposal can be found beginning on page 97. The Board is recommending a vote against this proposal.

 

8    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    9

 



General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting

 

The Board is providing you with these proxy materials in connection with its solicitation of proxies to be voted at our 2018 Annual Meeting2023 annual meeting of Stockholdersstockholders and at any postponement or adjournment of the annual meeting. In this proxy statement, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. may also be referred to as “we,” “our,” “us,” “HII” or “the company.”

You will be able to attend the annual meeting, as well as vote and submit questions during the meeting, by following the instructions set forth under the headings “Record Date and Voting,” on pages 11 and 12, and “Attending the Annual Meeting,” beginning on page 101, of this proxy statement.

The virtual annual meeting is supported across browsers (MS Edge, Firefox, Chrome and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets and cell phones) running the most up-to-date version of applicable software and plugins. Please note that Internet Explorer is not a supported browser. Participants should ensure that they have a strong internet connection wherever they intend to participate in the meeting. The meeting will begin promptly at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. If you encounter difficulties accessing the virtual meeting, please call the technical support number 1-888-724-2416 or International 1-781-575-2748.

ITEMS OF BUSINESS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

The Board is asking you to vote on the following items at the annual meeting:

 

elect ten directors;

elect 11 directors;

 

approve the company’s executive compensation on an advisory basis;

approve the company’s executive compensation on an advisory basis;

 

select the frequency of future advisory approvals of executive compensation on an advisory basis;

ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors; and

 

ratify the appointment of our independent auditors; and

consider a stockholder proposal requesting that HII disclose on its website an annual report of HII’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures, if properly presented at the annual meeting.

consider a stockholder proposal to enable stockholders to take action by written consent, if properly presented at the meeting.

APPOINTMENT OF PROXY HOLDERS

The Board asks you to appoint Kellye L. WalkerChad N. Boudreaux and Charles R. Monroe, Jr. as your proxy holders to vote your shares at the annual meeting. You make this appointment by submitting your proxy using one of the voting methods described below.

If appointed by you, the proxy holders will vote your shares as you direct on the matters described in this proxy statement. If you received a proxy card and you complete and return the proxy card but do not provide voting directions, they will vote your shares as recommended by the Board on all of the matters described in this proxy statement that are brought beforepresented at the annual meeting.

The Board is not aware of any business that may properly be brought beforepresented at the annual meeting other than those matters described in this proxy statement. If any other matters are properly brought beforepresented at the annual meeting, your proxy gives discretionary authority to the proxy holders to vote the shares in their best judgment.

NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we are permitted to furnish our proxy materials to our stockholders over the Internet by delivering a Notice of Internet

10    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting

Availability of Proxy Materials. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instructs you on how to access and review the proxy statement and 20172022 Annual Report over the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy over the Internet. We believe thisThis e-proxy process expedites receipt of proxy materials by stockholders, while also lowering our costs and reducing the environmental impact of our annual meeting. We have used thise-proxy process to furnish proxy materials over the Internet to certain of our stockholders over the Internet.who have so elected.

If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in the mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting these materials provided in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    9


General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting

RECORD DATE AND VOTING

Stockholders owning our common stock at the close of business on March 8, 2018,2023, the record date, or their legal proxy holders, are entitled to vote at the annual meeting. The Board strongly encourages you to vote. Your vote is important. Voting early helps ensure we receive a quorum of shares necessary to hold the annual meeting. ManyWhen stockholders do not vote, meaning the stockholders who do vote influence the outcome of the matters on which they vote in greater proportion than their percentage ownership of HII shares.

We have two types of stockholders: stockholders of record and “street name” stockholders. Stockholders of record are stockholders who own their shares in their own names on the company’s books. Street name stockholders are stockholders who own their shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record.

Voting by Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record, you have four voting options. You may vote:

 

 

over the Internet atwww.envisionreports.com/HII, the web address included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and in the proxy card (if you received a proxy card);

 

by telephone through the number included in the proxy card (if you received a proxy card);

by telephone through the number included in the proxy card (if you received a proxy card);

 

by signing and dating your proxy card (if you received a proxy card) and mailing it in the prepaid and addressed envelope; or

by signing and dating your proxy card (if you received a proxy card) and mailing it in the prepaid and addressed envelope; or

 

by attending the annual meeting and voting in person.

by virtually attending the annual meeting and voting (there is no physical location for the annual meeting).

If you have Internet access, we encourage you to vote over the Internet. It is convenient and it saves us significant postage and processing costs. In addition, when you vote by proxy over the Internet or by telephone prior to the meeting date, your proxy vote is recorded immediately, and there is noeliminating the risk that postal delays will cause your proxy vote to arrive late and therefore not be counted.

Internet and telephone voting facilities for stockholders of record are available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Tuesday, May 1, 2018.day. The Internet and telephone voting procedures verify you are a stockholder of record by use of a control number and enable you to confirm your voting instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote by Internet or telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card (if you received a proxy card).

You will also be able to attend, participate and vote your shares electronically at the annual meeting online by visiting: https://meetnow.global/MKKD465. If you are a stockholder of record (i.e., you hold your shares through our transfer agent, Computershare), you do not need to register to participate in the annual meeting virtually on the Internet. Please follow the instructions on the notice or proxy card that you received.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    11


General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting

Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual annual meeting, and vote in person, we urge you to have your proxy vote recorded in advance of the meeting. If you attend the annual meeting and vote at the annual meeting, any prior proxy votes you submitted, whether by Internet, telephone or mail, will be superseded by the vote you cast at the annual meeting. Because it is not practical for most stockholders to attend the annual meeting, the Board recommends you vote using one of the other voting methods. In any event, the method by which you vote your proxy will not limit your right to vote at the annual meeting if you decide to attend in person.virtually attend.

Revoking Your Proxy for Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record and you vote by proxy using any method, you may later revoke your proxy later and change your vote at any time before the polls close at the annual meeting. You may do this by:

 

sending a written statement to that effect to Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., Attn: Corporate Secretary, 4101 Washington Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 23607, provided we receive your written statement before the annual meeting date; or

sending a written statement to that effect to Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., Attn: Corporate Secretary, 4101 Washington Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 23607, provided we receive your written statement before the annual meeting date; or

 

10    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting

voting again over the Internet or by telephone; or

 

voting again over the Internet or by telephone prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Tuesday, May 1, 2018; or

signing and returning another proxy card with a later date, provided we receive the later proxy card before the annual meeting date; or

 

signing and returning another proxy card with a later date, provided we receive the later proxy card before the annual meeting date; or

voting in person at the annual meeting.

virtually attending the annual meeting and voting.

Only the most recent proxy vote will be counted, and all others will be discarded regardless of the method of voting.

Voting by Street Name Stockholders. If your shares are held in “street name” through a broker, bank or other nominee, please refer to the instructions they provide regarding how to vote your shares or to revoke your voting instructions. The availability of telephone and Internet voting depends upon the voting processes of the broker, bank or other nominee.

If you are a street name stockholder, you must register with Computershare no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on April 27, 2023, to participate in the annual meeting. To do so you must submit proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting your HII share holdings, along with your name and would likeemail address, to Computershare. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy.” You will receive a confirmation of your registration by email after we receive your registration materials. Requests for registration should be directed to us as follows:

By email: Forward the email from your broker, or attach an image of your legal proxy, to

legalproxy@computershare.com

By mail:

Computershare

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. Legal Proxy

P.O. Box 43001

Providence, RI 02940-3001

Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual annual meeting, we urge you to have your proxy vote recorded in personadvance of the meeting. If you attend the annual meeting and vote at the annual meeting, any prior proxy votes you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, fromsubmitted, whether by Internet, telephone or mail, will be superseded by the bank, broker or other holder of record through whichvote you hold your shares. Because it is not practical for most stockholders to attendcast at the annual meeting, the Board recommends you vote using one of the other voting methods.meeting. In any event, the method by which you vote your proxy will not limit your right to vote at the annual meeting if you decide to attend in person.virtually attend.

Confidential Voting. We treat your vote as confidential to protect the privacy of our stockholders’stockholder votes. Proxies and voting instructions provided to banks, brokers and other holders of record are kept confidential. Only the proxy solicitor, the proxy tabulator and the inspector of elections have access to the proxies and voting instructions.

12    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting

QUORUM, VOTE REQUIRED AND METHOD OF COUNTING

At the close of business on the record date, 44,767,11939,925,745 shares of our common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Each outstanding share is entitled to one vote.

A quorum must be present to transact business at the annual meeting. A quorum will be present if a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote as of the record date are present, in person or by proxy. If you indicate an abstention as your voting preference on all matters, your shares will be counted toward a quorum but will not be voted on any matter. If you are a street name stockholder and do not vote your shares, your bank, broker or other holder of record may vote your shares on the proposal to ratify the appointment of our independent auditors, which is known as a routine matter. Votes by a bank, broker or other holder of record on any routine matter will count for purposes of determining a quorum. In the absence of a quorum, the chairperson of the meeting may adjourn the meeting, and, at any reconvened meeting following such an adjournment at which a quorum is present, any business may be transacted whichthat might have been transacted at the original meeting.meeting may be transacted.

If you are a street name stockholder and do not vote your shares, your bank, broker or other holder of record can vote your shares in its discretion only on Item 43 described in this proxy statement. If you do not give your bank, broker or other holder of record instructions on how to vote your shares on Items 1, 2 3 and 54 described in this proxy statement, your shares will not be voted on those matters. Such “broker non-votes” will have no impact on the results of the vote on Items 1, 2 and 4.

If you havehold shares inthrough an HII employee benefit plan, you cannot vote your shares directly. Instead, you can provide voting instructions to the plan trustee, who will vote the shares on your behalf. HII employee benefit plans that hold HII shares provide for pass-through voting to plan participants and designate that plan participants are “named fiduciaries” under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) for purposes of voting their shares and those shares for which plan participants do not provide voting directions. If you are a plan participant and do not vote thoseyour shares, your trustee will vote your shares in accordance with the terms of the relevant plan. Accordingly,As such, your trustee may vote your shares in the same proportion as shares held by the plan for which voting instructions have been received from other participants, which are “named fiduciaries,” unless contrary to ERISA.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    11


General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting

The required vote and method of calculation for the matters to be consideredpresented at the annual meeting are as follows:

Item 1—Proposal to Elect Directors

Directors will be elected by a pluralitymajority of the shares present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting or any adjournment thereof and entitled to vote on the election of directors. Plurality voting means the tenvotes cast—that is, a director nominees receiving the most votes will be elected toif the Board. If you do not want your shares to be voted with respect to a particular director nominee, you may “withhold” your vote with respect to that nominee. If a director nominee receives a greater number of votes “withheld” for his or her election than votes cast “for” his or her election,shares voted in favor of such nomineedirector exceeds the number of shares voted against such director. Abstentions will be required underhave no effect on the majority vote director resignation policy included in our Corporate Governance Guidelines to submit an offerresults of resignation to the Board for its consideration.vote. If you are a street name stockholder and do not vote your shares, your bank, broker or other holder of record cannot vote your shares on this item, and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

Item 2—Proposal to Approve Executive Compensation on an Advisory Basis

The executive compensation of our NEOs will be approved as an advisory recommendation to the Board if the number of shares voted in favor exceeds the number of shares voted against. Abstentions will have no effect on the results of the vote. If you are a street name stockholder and do not vote your shares, your bank, broker or other holder of record cannot vote your shares on this item, and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Although the vote on this item isnon-binding, the Compensation Committee will review the results of the vote, undertake to determine why stockholders voted against the company’s executive compensation and consider itthe reasons in making future decisions concerning executive compensation.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    13


General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting

Item 3—Proposal to Select Frequency of Future Advisory Approvals of Executive Compensation on an Advisory Basis

The frequency of future stockholder advisory approvals (every year, every two years, or every three years) receiving the greatest number of votes will be considered the frequency recommended by stockholders. Abstentions will have no effect on the results of the vote. If you are a street name stockholder and do not vote your shares, your bank, broker or other holder of record cannot vote your shares on this item, and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Although the vote on this item isnon-binding, the Board will review the results of the vote and consider the vote in adopting a policy concerning the frequency of such advisory votes in the future.

Item 4—Proposal to Ratify Appointment of Our Independent Auditors

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors will be approved if the number of shares voted in favor exceeds the number of shares voted against. Abstentions will have no effect on the results of the vote. If you are a street name stockholder and do not vote your shares, your bank, broker or other holder of record can vote your shares at its discretion on this item.

Item 5—4—Stockholder Proposal to Enable Stockholders to Take Action by Written ConsentRequesting that HII Disclose on its Website an Annual Report of HII’s Direct and Indirect Lobbying Activities and Expenditures

The stockholder proposal to enable stockholders to take action by written consentrequesting that HII disclose on its website an annual report of HII’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures will be approved as an advisory recommendation to the Board if the number of shares voted in favor exceeds the number of shares voted against the proposal. Abstentions will have no effect on the results of the vote. If you are a street name stockholder and do not vote your shares, your bank, broker or other holder of record cannot vote your shares on this item, and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

12    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting

IMPORTANT REMINDER OF EFFECT OF NOT CASTING YOUR VOTE IF YOU ARE A STREET NAME STOCKHOLDER

If you are a street name stockholder, it is critical you vote your shares if you want your vote to count on Items 1, 2 3 and 5.4. Your bank, broker or other holder of record is not permitted to vote your shares on Items 1, 2 3 or 5,and 4, unless you instruct them how you wish to vote. Such “brokernon-votes” will have no impact on the results of the vote on Items 1, 2 3 or 5.and 4.

SOLICITING AND TABULATING VOTES

The Board has made these materials available to you in connection with its solicitation of proxies for use at our annual meeting. We will bear the costs of soliciting and tabulating your votes. OurIn addition to solicitation by mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies personally, by telephone, by email or otherwise,otherwise. These directors, officers and employees will not receive additional compensation for the solicitation, but may solicit your votes without additional compensation.be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation. In addition, we have retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies for the 20182023 annual meeting for a fee of $12,500,$15,000, plus associated costs and expenses.

Copies of solicitation materials will be furnished to brokerage firms, fiduciaries and other custodians that hold shares of our common stock of record for beneficial owners, for forwarding to such beneficial owners. We willmay also reimburse banks, brokers and other holders of record for reasonable,out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding these proxy materials to you, according to certain regulatory fee schedules. See “Electronic Access to Proxy Statement and Annual Report” below for information on how you can help reduce printing and mailing costs.

ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO PROXY STATEMENT AND ANNUAL REPORT

You can elect in advance to receive future proxy materials by email. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email with instructions containing a link to the website where those materials are available, as well as a link to the proxy voting website.

If you are a stockholder of record, you may enroll in the electronic delivery service by going directly to www.envisionreports.com/HII. You may revoke your electronic delivery election at this sitewebsite at any time and request a paper copy of the proxy statement and annual report.

14    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting

If you are a street name stockholder, you may also have the opportunitybe able to receive copies of the proxy statement and annual report electronically. Please check the information provided in the proxy materials you received from your bank, broker or other holder of record concerning the availability of this service.

HOUSEHOLDING INFORMATION

We have adopted a procedure called “householding.” Under this procedure, stockholders of record who have the same address and last name and do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials will receive only one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the printed proxy materials, unless we have received contrary instructions from one or bothall of such stockholders. This procedure reduces our printing costs and postage fees and is environmentally friendly.

If you and another stockholder of record with whom you share an address are receiving multiple copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the printed proxy materials, you can request to receive a single copy of the printed proxy materials in the future by calling our transfer agent, Computershare, at1-888-665-9610, or writing to usComputershare at www-us.computershare.com/Investor/ or HII at Investor Relations, 4101 Washington Avenue, Newport News, VA 23607. If you and another stockholder of record with whom you share an address wish to receive a separate Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or separate printed proxy materials, we will promptly deliver them to you if you request them by contacting Computershare by phone or Investor Relations in writing in the same manner as described above.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    13


General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting

Stockholders who participate in householding and who receive printed proxy materials will continue to receive separate proxy cards. If you are a street name stockholder, you can request householding by contacting your bank, broker or other holder of record through which you hold your shares.

 

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    15

14    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.



Governance of the Company

 

OVERVIEW OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate governance addresses the relationships among the Board, company management and the company’s stockholders, with the objectives of promoting the company’s long-term success, improving corporate performance, strengthening Board and management accountability and promoting the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Board and senior management are committed to high standards of corporate governance.governance best practices. We believe those high standardsgovernance best practices are important not only to our stockholders, but also to our customers, employees, suppliers and other stakeholders.stakeholders as well.

The following sections provide an overview of our corporate governance model and practices. Among other topics, we describe the responsibilities of the Board, how directors are selected and certain keyimportant aspects of Board operations.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

We believe the foundation for goodof sound corporate governance starts withis a board of directors whose independence, skills, experience and judgment will enable the board to effectively oversee management of the company and to provide constructive advice and counsel to management. TheIn addition to its general oversight of management, the Board and its committees perform a number of important functions for the company and its stockholders, including:

 

providing advice on and overseeing the company’s strategic plan developed by management;

evaluating, approving and overseeing the company’s strategic plan developed by management;

 

assessing the significant enterprise risks to which the company is subject and overseeing management of those enterprise risks;

reviewing and approving operating, financial and other corporate plans;

 

selecting our chief executive officer and evaluating the performance of the chief executive officer and other senior executive officers;

understanding and assessing the significant enterprise risks to which the company is subject and overseeing management of those enterprise risks;

 

overseeing development and succession plans for our senior executives;

selecting our chief executive officer and evaluating the performance of the chief executive officer and other executive officers;

 

monitoring the company’s financial performance and reviewing and approving significant corporate actions;

overseeing succession plans for our CEO and other senior executives;

 

overseeing processes that protect the integrity of the company, including the integrity of the company’s financial statements and compliance with legal requirements and the company’s ethics and business conduct standards; and

monitoring and evaluating the performance of the company and management;

 

evaluating the effectiveness of the Board and its committees.

evaluating and approving significant corporate transactions and commitments not entered into in the ordinary course;

overseeing processes that protect the integrity of the company, including the integrity of the company’s financial statements, and compliance with legal requirements and the company’s ethics and business conduct standards;

providing advice and counsel to management; and

evaluating the effectiveness of the Board and its committees.

The Board’s oversight role is also effected through the Board’s fourfive standing committees—the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Cybersecurity Committee, the Governance and Policy Committee and the Finance Committee. Each of these committees operates under a separate written charter to promote clarity in their responsibilities and to ensure the committees function in coordination with each other and with the full Board. Our committees are discussed in greater detail beginning on page 21 of this proxy statement.

16    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Governance of the Company

CRITERIA FOR BOARD MEMBERSHIP

The Board believes all director candidates must possess certain basicfundamental qualifications and that specialized skills and experiencesexperience should be contributed to the Board by individual directors. The

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    15


Governance of the Company

Board and the Governance and Policy Committee consider the qualifications of directors and director candidates individually and in the broader context of the Board’s collective skills and experiencesexperience measured against the current and future needs of the Board.

Qualifications for All Directors. The Board believes all its members must possess the following basicfundamental qualifications:

 

high personal and professional integrity and ethical standards;

high personal and professional integrity and ethical standards;

 

substantial educational, business, military or professional accomplishments in leading organizations;

significant educational, business, military or professional achievements in leading organizations;

 

ability to represent the best interests of all stockholders; and

ability to represent the best interests of all stockholders; and

 

demonstrated leadership ability and sound judgment.

demonstrated leadership ability and sound judgment.

Prospective directors must also be willing to submit to a background check necessary for obtaining a security clearance.

Selection of Individual Candidates. In addition to the qualifications applicable to all director candidates, the Board and the Governance and Policy Committee consider, among other matters, a candidate’s knowledge ofexperience and experienceskills in such areas as:

 

finance, accounting and capital markets

executive leadership and strategy

 

the industries in which the company competes

investment strategy, corporate development and mergers and acquisitions

 

manufacturing and operations

corporate governance

 

human resources

advanced technology and innovation

 

military and government

executive finance and accounting

 

government relations

human resources and labor relations

 

legal, regulatory and compliance matters

compliance, legal and regulatory

 

technology

shipbuilding and manufacturing operations

 

risk management

nuclear

 

corporate development and strategy

military and government relations

We

cyber and IT risk management

technical services executive leadership

aerospace and defense industries

The Board also considerconsiders whether a candidate can commit sufficient time and attention to Board activities, andas well as any potential conflicts with the company’s interests. Our objective is to havefor the

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    17


Governance of the Company

collective skills, experiences, attributes and perspectives thatof Board members to create an outstanding, dynamic and effective Board and strengthen the Board’s ability to oversee the company’s business, enhance its performance and represent the long-term interests of stockholders. All of ournon-employee directors are expected to serve on Board committees, supporting the Board’s mission by providing expertise to those committees, and the needsoversight responsibilities of those committees are considered when evaluating director candidates. The Board and the Governance and Policy Committee also consider other attributes, including diversity factors, when selecting director nominees, seeking representation of a range of experiences, backgrounds and perspectives.

Service on Other Boards. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board considers the number of boards of other public companies and audit committees of those boardsother public companies on which a director candidate serves. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors should not

16    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Governance of the Company

serve on more than four boards of publicly-tradedpublicly traded companies, in addition toincluding our Board, and our directors who also serve as chief executive officers or in equivalent positions of other companies should not serve on more than twoone other boardsboard of publicly-traded companies,a publicly traded company, in each case without the approval of the chairmanChairman of our Governance and Policy Committee.the Board. A director who is a full-time employee of our company may not serve on the board of directors of more than two other publicly-tradedpublicly traded companies, unless approved by the Board. No member of our Audit Committee may serve on the audit committees of more than three publicly-tradedpublicly traded companies (including our company) without the approval of the Board, which must determine annually that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of the member to effectively serve on our Audit Committee.

Retirement Policy. Under the retirement policy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a director will not bere-nominated at the annual meeting following the earlier of his or her 76th birthday or 15 years of service on the Board. Upon the recommendation of the Governance and Policy Committee, the Board may waive either of these requirements as to any director, if the Board deems a waiver to be in the best interests of the company. Stephen R. Wilson, the current Chairman of our Audit Committee, has turned 76 since our last annual meeting of stockholders and is therefore not standing for election at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.

In addition to our retirement policy, when a director’s principal occupation or business association changes substantially during his or her tenure as a director, the Board expects the affected director willto tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Governance and Policy Committee and the Board, as provided in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Conclusion.Conclusion. Satisfaction of the foregoing criteria for Board membership is implemented and assessedmonitored through a continuous consideration of director succession process administered by the Governance and Policy Committee and the Board, as well as through the Board’s self-evaluation process. The Board and the Governance and Policy Committee believe that, individually and collectively, the company’s current directors possess the necessary qualifications, skills, experience and attributes to provide effective oversight of the company’sHII’s business and contribute constructive advice and counsel to the company’s management.

DIRECTOR NOMINATION PROCESS

The Governance and Policy Committee is responsible under its charter for recommending director nominees to the full Board director nominees for election by our stockholders and for identifying and recommending candidates to fill any vacancies that may occur on the Board. The Governance and Policy Committee may use a variety of sources to identify candidates. Candidates may be identified throughcandidates, including recommendations from independent directors or members of management, search firms, discussionscommunications with other persons who may know of suitable candidates to serve on the Board and stockholder recommendations.

18    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Governance of the Company

Evaluations of director candidates who would be new to the Board (other than nominees recommended by our stockholders, as described below) include considerationevaluations of the candidate’s background and qualifications by the Governance and Policy Committee, interviews with the Chairman of the Board, members of the Governance and Policy Committee and one or more other members of the Board members who so desire, to interview a candidate, and deliberations of the Governance and Policy Committee and the full Board. The Governance and Policy Committee then recommends the candidate(s) to the full Board, with the full Board selecting the candidate(s) to be nominated for election by our stockholders or to be elected by the Board to fill a vacancy.

In connection with its recommendations of director nominees to the Board of director nominees for election at each annual meeting, the Governance and Policy Committee considers the size of the Board and the criteria set forth above to recommend nominees who, individually and as a group and collectively with directors who will continueother director nominees, the committee believes comprise the skills, experience and qualifications the Board needs to serve onachieve its mission. Accordingly, in connection with the Board,annual meeting director nomination process, the Governance and Policy Committee believes satisfy the qualifications the Board needs. Accordingly, the Governance and Policy Committee annually reviews the composition of the Board as a whole and makes recommendations if necessary, to improve the Board to achieve what it believes is the optimal mix of experience, expertise, skills, specialized knowledge, diversity and other factors.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    17


Governance of the Company

Stockholders who wish to recommend director candidates for consideration by the Governance and Policy Committee must submit the name and relevant information about the candidate in writing to the Corporate Secretary. All director candidates recommended by stockholders are required to meet the criteria for directors described above, and candidates who meet thesuch criteria described above will be evaluated by the Governance and Policy Committee. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Governance and Policy Committee will evaluate director candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner as candidates identified through other means.

Stockholders who wish to nominate a person for election as a director at an annual meeting must follow the procedures set forth in our bylaws, andas described beginning on page 2630 of this proxy statement. Additionally, our bylaws include a proxy access right, which enables a stockholder or a group of up to 20 stockholders owning continuously for at least three years an amount of shares that constitutes 3% or more of our outstanding common stock as of the date of nomination to nominate and include in our proxy materials director candidates constituting up to the greater of 25% of the number of directors then in office or two directors, subject to the requirements specified in our bylaws. Stockholders who wish to nominate director candidates for inclusion in our proxy materials under our proxy access bylaw provisions must satisfy the requirements in our bylaws, as described under the heading “Communications and Company Documents—Future Stockholder Proposals and Nominations of Directors” of this proxy statement. The Board expects to evaluate any director candidates nominated through the proxy access process in athe same manner similar to that foras other director candidates.candidates are evaluated.

MAJORITY VOTE DIRECTOR RESIGNATION POLICY

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include a majority vote director resignation policy. Under such policy, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election (a “Majority Withhold Vote”) in an uncontested election of directors must tender to the Board his or her offer of resignation within five days following certification of the stockholder vote. The Governance and Policy Committee will promptly consider the resignation offer and make a recommendation to the Board to accept or reject the tendered offer of resignation. The Board will act on the Governance and Policy Committee’s recommendation within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote. The Board will then promptly disclose its decision to accept or reject the director’s resignation offer, including its rationale, in a report furnished to or filed with the SEC.

The Governance and Policy Committee in making its recommendation, and the Board in making its decision, will consider the best interests of the company and our stockholders and may consider any other factors or other information that it considers appropriate and relevant, including but not limited to:

the stated reasons, if any, why stockholders withheld their votes;

possible alternatives for curing the underlying cause of the withheld votes;

the director’s tenure;

the director’s qualifications;

the director’s past and expected future contributions to the company; and

the overall composition of the Board and its committees, including whether, if the offer of resignation is accepted, the company will no longer be in compliance with any applicable law, rule, regulation or governing document.

Any director who tenders his or her offer of resignation under our majority vote director resignation policy will not participate in the Governance and Policy Committee deliberation or recommendation or

18    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Governance of the Company

Board deliberation or action to accept or reject the resignation offer. If a majority of the Governance and Policy Committee received a Majority Withhold Vote at the same election, then the independent directors (other than those who received a Majority Withhold Vote in that election) will instead appoint a committee among themselves to consider the resignation offers and recommend to the Board whether to accept them. If, however, the independent directors who did not receive a Majority Withhold Vote constitute two or fewer directors, all independent directors may participate in the action to accept or reject the resignation offers, except that each director who has tendered his or her offer of resignation will recuse himself or herself from the deliberations and voting with respect to his or her individual offer to resign.

If a director’s resignation offer is not accepted by the Board, that director will continue to serve for the term for which he or she was elected and until his or her successor is duly elected, or his or her earlier resignation or removal. If a director’s resignation offer is accepted by the Board, then the Board, in its sole discretion in accordance with our bylaws, may fill any resulting vacancy or may decrease the size of the Board.

STOCKHOLDERS RIGHT TO NOMINATE PROXY ACCESS NOMINEES

Our bylaws provide our stockholders proxy access rights. Under Section 2.15 of our bylaws, we are required to include in our proxy materials for an annual meeting any stockholder nominee who is nominated by an “Eligible Stockholder.” An “Eligible Stockholder” is any stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders that has beneficially owned continuously for at least three years an amount of shares that constitutes 3% or more of our outstanding common stock as of the date of nomination. Eligible Stockholders must provide proof of ownership of the requisite amount of stock for the three-year time period and represent that the shares were acquired in the ordinary course of business and not to change or influence control of the company. Eligible Stockholders must also provide certain other written representations, warranties and agreements to the company, including an agreement to assume liability from any legal or regulatory violation arising out of the Eligible Stockholder’s communication with our stockholders and to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, as described in more detail in Section 2.15 of the bylaws.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    19


Governance of the Company

The maximum number of directors who can be nominated by Eligible Stockholders, referred to as “Stockholder Nominees,” at any annual meeting is the greater of 25% of the number of directors then in office or two directors. Section 2.15 of our bylaws includes procedures to prioritize nominations if the number of Stockholder Nominees exceeds the maximum number of Stockholder Nominees we are required to include in our proxy materials for any annual meeting. Stockholder Nominees must provide written notice to the company, which must include specific information, including information similar to the information required from stockholders to propose business and director nominations through the advance notice provisions included in Section 2.08 of our bylaws. As described in Section 2.15 of our bylaws, this notice must include an express consent to be named as a director nominee in our proxy materials and to serve as a director if elected, as well as required disclosures and information about, and representations, undertakings and consents by, the Stockholder Nominee to enable the Board to determine whether the Stockholder Nominee meets the independence and other general requirements for directors set forth in our bylaws and corporate governance guidelines.our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Stockholders who would like to nominate candidates using proxy access should refer to Section 2.15 of our bylaws, which sets forth all the requirements for proxy access nominations. The Board may exclude any Stockholder Nominee from our proxy materials if the Stockholder Nominee or Eligible Stockholder(s) fail to meet the requirements or provide the undertakings set forth in our bylaws or corporate governance guidelinesCorporate Governance Guidelines and for other reasons set forth in our bylaws. See “Communications and Company Documents—Future Stockholder Proposals and Nominations of Directors.”

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    19


Governance of the Company

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Board makes determinations regarding the independence of our directors on an annual basis, based upon the Governance and Policy Committee’s evaluation of director independence and related recommendations to the Board. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, to be considered independent: (i) a director must be independent as determined under Section 303(A).02(b) ofin accordance with the NYSE Listed Company Manual and (ii) in the Board’s judgment, the director must not have a material relationship with the company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company).

The Board has considered relevant relationships between the company and eachnon-employee director to determine compliance with NYSEthe independence requirements.requirements included in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Based upon its review, the Board has determined that General Collins, Mr. Bilden, Gen. Collins, ADMDenault, Admiral Donald, ADM Fargo, Ms. Harker, Mr. Jimenez, Ms. Kelly, Ms. McKibben, Ms. O’Sullivan, Mr. Schievelbein, Mr. Welch and Mr. Wilson, who currently comprise the Board’snon-employee directors, are independent. The Board has also determined that each current member of the Audit Committee satisfies the additional SEC independence requirements of the SECapplicable to audit committee members, and that each current member of the Compensation Committee satisfies the enhanced independence requirements of the NYSE listing standards.

The Board also considered in 2017 relevant relationships between the company and ADM Paul D. Miller, who retired from the Board effective May 3, 2017. Based upon its review, the Board determined that ADM Miller was independent for purposes of serving on the Board and that ADM Miller satisfied the additional independence requirements for Compensation Committee members.

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Board understands thatbelieves one of its primary responsibilities is to evaluate and determine the optimal leadership structure for the Board from time to time the optimal Board leadership structure to facilitateprovide effective oversight of the company. Our bylaws establish the position of Chairman of the Board and ourdirect that the Board will designate the Chairman. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines stateprovide further that the Board believes it is in the best interests of the company and its stockholders for the Board to have the flexibility to determine the best director to serve as Chairman. The independent directors consider this matter onaddress the Chairman role at least an annual basis. This consideration includesannually, comparing the advantages and disadvantages of a combined chairman and chief executive officer role and separate chairman and chief executive officer roles in the context of our operating and governance environment over time, with the goal of achieving the optimal model for the Board’s effective oversighttime.

20    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Governance of the company’s affairs.Company

Non-Executive Chairman. The Board has considered the Board leadership matter and determined an independent,non-executive chairman is the optimal model for the companyHII at this time. This structureA non-executive chairman provides the Board with independent leadership and allowsfacilitates the chief executive officer toofficer’s focus on the company’s business operations. The independent directors appointed ADM FargoBoard elected Admiral Donald as ournon-executive Chairman of the Board at the time the company was spun off in 2011,April 2020, and he has served as Chairmancontinued to elect him on annual basis since that time.

Ournon-executive Chairman has the following responsibilities under our Corporate Governance Guidelines:

 

chair all Board and stockholder meetings, including executive sessions of the independent directors;

chair all Board and stockholder meetings, including executive sessions of the independent directors;

 

serve as a liaison between the chief executive officer and the independent directors;

serve as a liaison between the chief executive officer and the independent directors;

 

ensure the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from management to the Board; although management is responsible for the preparation of materials for the Board, thenon-executive Chairman may specifically request the inclusion of certain materials;

ensure the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from management to the Board (although management is responsible for the preparation of materials for the Board, the non-executive Chairman may specifically request the inclusion of certain materials);

 

20    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Governance of the Company

prepare the agendas of the Board meetings and assist the chairperson of each standing committee with preparation of agendas for the respective committee meetings, taking into account the requests of other Board and committee members;

 

prepare the agendas of the Board meetings and assist the chairman of each standing committee with preparation of agendas for the respective committee meetings, taking into account the requests of other Board and committee members;

set an appropriate schedule for Board meetings to assure there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items;

 

set an appropriate schedule for Board meetings to assure there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items;

along with the chairman of the Governance and Policy Committee, interview all Board candidates and make recommendations to the Governance and Policy Committee and the Board;

 

along with the chairman of the Governance and Policy Committee, interview all Board candidates and make recommendations to the Governance and Policy Committee and the Board;

have the authority to call meetings of the Board and meetings of the independent directors; and

 

have the authority to call meetings of the Board and meetings of the independent directors; and

if requested by the chief executive officer, be available for consultation and direct communication with stockholders.

if requested by the chief executive officer, be available for consultation and direct communication with stockholders.

Conclusion.Conclusion. All of our directors play an active role in overseeing the company’s businessHII at both the Board and committee levels. The Board is currently comprised of 11 independent directors and onenon-independent director, who serves as our Chief Executive Officer and nine independent directors.Officer. Our independent directors are skilled and experienced leaders in business, industry, the military and the military.government. Our independent directors are effective in collaboratingeffectively collaborate with management and thoroughly consideringevaluate management proposals, made by management, and an independent Board leader supportsfacilitates this relationship. We therefore believe anon-executive Chairman of the Board, along with eight10 other strong independent directors, is an appropriate and effective structuremodel at this time to oversee the company’s affairsmanagement of HII and to provide advice and counsel to the Chief Executive Officer and other seniorexecutive management of the company.

BOARD COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS AND MEMBERSHIP

The Board has fourfive standing committees: Audit, Compensation, Cybersecurity, Governance and Policy and Finance. Each of the Audit, Compensation and Governance and Policy Committees is constituted and operated in accordance with SEC requirements and the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards;standards. The Cybersecurity Committee and Finance Committee are not required by the Finance Company isSEC or the NYSE listing standards and are therefore not subject to any such requirements or standards. Each Board committee is governed by a written charter, which sets forth the responsibilities of the committee, including the responsibilities described in this section. Each charter can be viewed on our website at www.huntingtoningalls.com www.hii.com and is available in print to any stockholder requesting a copy. All members of each Board committee are independent, as determined under the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    21


Governance of the Company

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include meeting periodically with management and with each of our independent auditor and our Vice President of Internal Audit to review audit results and the adequacy of and compliance with our system of internal controls. In addition, the Audit Committee appoints and discharges our independent auditor, evaluates proposed audit and permissiblenon-audit services from the independent auditor for their impact on the independence of the auditor and, if appropriate, approves such services.include:

Overseeing HII’s relationship with its independent auditor, including (i) reviewing and pre-approving each service and related fees considered to be auditing services and non-prohibited non-audit services and (ii) meeting with the independent auditor to review, among other things, all critical accounting policies, all material alternative accounting treatments discussed with management, and all material written communications with management

Overseeing our internal audit function

Overseeing financial statement and disclosure matters, including meeting with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditor to review and discuss the content of our periodic reports, including financial information, and management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting

Reviewing and overseeing HII’s policies and practices relating to corporate sustainability matters relative to environmental stewardship

Overseeing other matters, including our major financial risk exposures and our compliance program

The current members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Wilson (chair)(chairman), Gen.General Collins, Mr. Denault, Mr. Schievelbein and Mr. Welch. Mr. Wilson will be retiring from the Board effective upon the election of directors at the 2023 annual meeting. Mr. Denault was appointed to the Audit Committee in December 2022 upon his election to the Board. The Board has determined, in accordance with NYSE requirements, that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and that Mr.each of Messrs. Wilson and Denault possesses accounting or related financial management expertise. The Board has also determined that Mr.each of Messrs. Wilson and Denault qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under applicable SEC rules.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include:

Establishing annual and long-term performance goals and objectives for the Chief Executive Officer and all other elected officers, and evaluating those officers against their goals and objectives

Reviewing, approving and submitting for ratification by the independent members of the Board the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation

Reviewing and approving the direct and indirect compensation of all other elected officers

Reviewing and recommending to the Board matters concerning compensation of Board members

Reviewing the succession of qualified executive management

Identifying, in consultation with management, the appropriate peer group for competitive comparisons and relative position of pay levels versus peers

Overseeing our policy regarding the recovery of performance-based short- or long-term cash or equity incentive compensation payments in certain circumstances

Reviewing and overseeing HII’s policies and practices relating to its human capital management function

Delegation: The Compensation Committee oversees alldoes not delegate its responsibilities with respect to compensation that is specific to the executive officers. For other employees and benefit programs and makesfor broad-based compensation decisions that affect our elected officers. Theplans, the Compensation Committee also provides strategic direction for our overall compensation structure, policies and programs and reviews senior management succession plans. Themay delegate authority to a subcommittee consisting of not less than two members of the Compensation Committee considers and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the compensation of directors.Committee.

 

22    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    21


Governance of the Company

 

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Ms. Harker (chair)(chairwoman), Mr. Bilden, ADM DonaldJimenez and Ms. Kelly. Ms. Kelly and Mr.Philip M. Bilden were appointed towas a member of the Compensation Committee until he resigned from the Board in May 2017 and November 2017, respectively.July 2022. The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies as anon-employee director under SEC Rule16b-3 and as an outside director for purposes of Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”)16b-3.

Cybersecurity Committee. The Cybersecurity Committee’s responsibilities include:

Reviewing the company’s enterprise cybersecurity strategy and framework, including the company’s assessment of cybersecurity threats and risk, data security programs and the company’s management and mitigation of cybersecurity and information technology risks and potential breach incidents

Reviewing any significant cybersecurity incident that has occurred, reports to or from regulators with respect thereto and steps that have been taken to mitigate against reoccurrence

Evaluating the effectiveness of the company’s cyber risk management and data security programs measured against the company’s cybersecurity threat landscape

Assessing the effectiveness of the company’s data breach incident response plan

Reviewing and assessing the company’s information technology disaster recovery capabilities

Reviewing the company’s assessment of cybersecurity threats and risk associated with the company’s supply chain and actions the company is taking to address such threats and risks

The current members of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“IRC”). None of our executive officers served as a memberCybersecurity Committee are Ms. O’Sullivan (chairwoman), General Collins, Admiral Donald and Mr. Wilson. Mr. Bilden was the Chairman of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of ourCybersecurity Committee until he resigned from the Board or our Compensation Committee. Accordingly, no interlocks with other companies, within the meaning of the SEC’s proxy rules, existed during 2017.in July 2022.

Governance and Policy Committee. The Governance and Policy Committee is responsible for developing and recommending to the Board criteria for Board membership; identifying, and reviewing the qualifications of, director candidates; and assessing the contributions and independence of incumbent directors in determining whether to recommend them for reelection to the Board. Committee’s responsibilities include:

Identifying candidates qualified to serve on the Board and recommending nominees for election to the Board

Identifying and recommending committee member appointments to the Board

Reviewing stockholder proposals and recommending any Board responses

Reviewing and overseeing HII’s policies and practices with respect to significant public policy and corporate citizenship and responsibility matters

Reviewing and overseeing HII’s policies and practices relating to significant corporate sustainability matters other than human capital matters and energy management matters

Overseeing the company’s policies and procedures for related party transactions and reviewing and overseeing related party transactions for potential conflicts of interest

Overseeing the evaluation of the Board

Generally monitoring the Board’s oversight of risk management

The Governance and Policy Committee also considers and makes recommendations to the Board regarding transactions with related persons and corporate governance matters generally and oversees the evaluation of the Board. Thecurrent members of the Governance and Policy Committee are Ms.Mr. Welch (chairman), Mr. Jimenez and Mses. Kelly (chair), Gen. Collins, ADM Fargo and Mr. Welch.McKibben.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    23


Governance of the Company

Finance Committee. The Finance Committee oversees and reviews our financial affairs, strategies and policies. Committee’s responsibilities include:

Overseeing and reviewing our financial affairs, strategies and policies

Reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding:

our financial policies and strategies, capital structure and financial condition

our issuances of debt and equity securities and significant borrowing transactions

strategic transactions

employee benefit plan assets

our dividend policy and stock repurchase programs

significant capital expenditures

Providing oversight to ensure that our financial policies and strategies are consistent with our capital budget, annual operating plan and strategic plan

Overseeing discrete operational matters that could have a significant impact on the company

The Finance Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding: our financial policies and strategies, capital structure and financial condition, our issuances of debt and equity securities and significant borrowing transactions, strategic transactions, our dividend policy and stock repurchase programs and significant capital expenditures. The Finance Committee also provides oversight to ensure that our financial policies and strategies are consistent with our capital budget, annual operating plan and strategic plan. Thecurrent members of the Finance Committee are Mr. Schievelbein (chair)(chairman), Mr. Bilden, ADMDenault, Admiral Donald and Ms. Harker.Mses. Harker, McKibben and O’Sullivan. Mr. BildenDenault was appointed to the Finance Committee in November 2017.

BOARD STRUCTURE

We amended our certificate of incorporation in 2015December 2022 upon his election to phase out the classificationBoard. Mr. Bilden was a member of the Finance Committee until he resigned from the Board beginning within July 2022.

BOARD STRUCTURE

HII directors serve one-year terms. Accordingly, the terms of the 11 directors nominated to stand for election at our 2023 annual meeting held in 2016 and ending with ourwill expire at the 2024 annual meeting held in 2018. With thephase-outof the Board classification complete, all ten of our directors will be voted upon at our 2018 annual meeting to serveone-year terms.stockholders.

EXECUTIVE SESSIONS OFNON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our directors, with no members of management present (including directors who are also officers of the company), have the opportunity to meet in executive session at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that at least one executive session of independent directors will be held each year. In 2017,2022, all of our directors, other than our Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice Chairman of the Board, were independent under NYSE corporate governance listing standards. The independent directors met in executive session at each of theall six regular Board meetings during the year. TheOur non-executive Chairman, presidesAdmiral Donald, presided over the executive sessions.

The Audit Committee routinely meets at each of its regular meetings in separate executive sessions with management, with our independent auditor, with our Vice President of Internal Audit and with only committee members only.present. The Compensation Committee, the Cybersecurity Committee, the Governance and Policy Committee and the Finance Committee also meet in executive session on a routine basis, with only members of the committee and other attending Board members present.

22    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Governance of the Company

THE BOARD’S ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT

The Board’s responsibilities include oversight of risk management, which includes overseeing our system of financial and operational internal controls, our compliance with applicable laws and regulations, data and cyber securitycybersecurity risks and our processes for identifying, assessing and mitigating

24    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Governance of the Company

other significant risks that may affect the company. The full Board oversees our enterprise risk associated with data and cyber security, and the Governance and Policy Committee oversees the internal governance of data and cyber security.

HII. To discharge its risk oversightthese responsibilities, the Board must understand the significant risks to which the company is subject. RisksWhile risks are an inherent in virtually everyelement of business decision,operations and our business strategy creates risks. Therisk, the Board understands it is neither possible nor prudent to eliminate all risk. Indeed, purposeful, appropriate and managed risk-taking is essential for the companyHII to be competitive and profitable and successfully execute its business strategy. The Board’s objective in overseeing risk management oversight objective is to satisfy itself thatconfirm management is identifying and appropriately assessingmanaging and mitigating our significant risks.

Management has implemented a robust enterprise risk management (“ERM”) program, which includes annual risk assessments, risk analyses, the development of risk plans for each enterprise risks,risk, which include risk mitigation activities, risk monitoring of enterprisefor both existing and emerging risks, and routineperiodic reports on individual enterprise risks and ERM program activities to seniorexecutive management and the Board. Our ERM process is managed by an Enterprise Risk Committee, comprised of management from across business units and programmatic and functional disciplines within the company. The Enterprise Risk Committee is responsible for developingoverseeing the enterprise risk assessments, developingassessment process, overseeing development of, and monitoring, enterprise risk mitigation plans, for our enterprise risks,assessing risk correlations, monitoring emerging and evolving risks and generating data and reports to facilitate management decision makingdecision-making and the Board’s risk oversight function. While the Board and its committees oversee risk management, management is responsible for identifying, assessing, managing and mitigating risks.

The Board and its committees are responsible for understanding and evaluating the company’sHII’s ERM processes and determiningto determine whether they are achieving their objectives. Management briefs the Board on an annual basis on the company’s overall ERM program, which includes a report on the results of the company’s annual enterprise risk assessment process, a review of the company’s latest roster of enterprise risks and assessments of the probabilities of such risks occurring and their potential severity, andas well as assessments of management’s capability of mitigating individual enterprise risks. Management also briefs the Board or a Board committee on a periodic basis on individual significant individual risks, which includes a report on the risk byfrom management’s risk owner and the related risk mitigation plan. Management seeks to brief the Board on each Tier 1 enterprise risk on an annual basis, except those Tier 1 risks that are relatively static (like the risk of hurricane impact and recovery), which are briefed on a biennial basis. The Board is updated on an interim basis on any changes to the company’sHII’s enterprise risk roster and any other material developments affecting the company’s ERM program.

The Governance and Policy Committee is responsible under its charter for developing and recommending to the full Board a methodologyregimen for the Board’s oversight of risk management and for monitoring the Board’s oversight of risk management. In connection with this responsibility, the Governance and Policy Committee evaluates the enterprise risk roster developed by company management,generated from the company’s enterprise risk assessment, allocates oversight responsibilities among the full Board and individual standing Board committees and develops a risk briefing schedule based upon management’s relative prioritization of enterprise risks.

OversightRisks are inherent in the company’s operations and pursuit of its strategy, and oversight of risk management is a continuous process and inherent in the company’s strategic decisions.process. The Board and its committees facilitate open communication between management and the directors and foster an appropriate culture of integrity and risk awareness. The Board and its committees engage in communications throughout the year with management regarding enterprise risk, assessment and risk management, and directors are encouraged to and do communicate directly with senior management.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    23


Governance of the Company

management, which they do on a routine basis.

While the full Board has ultimate responsibility for the oversight of risk management, Board committees oversee certain individual enterprise risks relating to matters within the scopes of their respective responsibilities and report to the full Board with respect to this oversight. All five standing Board

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    25


Governance of the Company

committees playalso oversee specific enterprise risks for which they have been assigned oversight responsibility. Board oversight of certain significant rolesrisks arising from the business and activities of HII is allocated generally among the Board and its committees as follows:

LOGO

26    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Governance of the Company

BOARD AND COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT OF CYBERSECURITY

In December 2019, in the risk management oversight function.

The Audit Committee oversees risks relatingresponse to the company’s financial statements,increasing risk exposure presented by data and cybersecurity, the financial reporting processBoard formed a standing Cybersecurity Committee of the Board. The Board believes that dedication of a standing committee to cybersecurity facilitates a deeper Board understanding of HII’s data and accountingcybersecurity risk exposure; the opportunity for committee members to have a deeper data and legal matters. The Audit Committee also oversees the internalcybersecurity knowledge base; and external audit functionscloser Board oversight of HII’s management and compliance with our Codemitigation of Ethicsdata and Business Conduct. The Audit Committee meets in executive sessions with our Vice President of Internal Audit and with representatives of our independent auditing firm to discuss our significant financial exposures and management’s processes for monitoring and managing such exposures.

The Compensation Committee evaluates the risks associated with our compensation principles and practices. As discussed in more detail under Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 38 of this proxy statement, the Compensation Committee evaluates and approves compensation programs designed to discourage inappropriate risk taking without diminishing the incentive elements of our compensation programs. The Compensation Committee also considers management’s processes for identifying and mitigating potential compensationcybersecurity risks. In addition to the Compensationoversight responsibilities set forth in the table above, the Cybersecurity Committee oversees our seniorparticipates with management succession planning process.at least annually in a “tabletop” exercise to test HII’s cybersecurity incident response plan. The committee also meets jointly twice a year with management’s Executive Cybersecurity and IT Steering Committee.

BOARD AND COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT OF SUSTAINABILITY

In connection with HII’s appointment of a Chief Sustainability Officer and formalization of its sustainability program in 2022, the Board refined its oversight of the company’s sustainability program. The Board allocated oversight responsibility among the Board and several committees for each of HII’s nine sustainability focus areas identified through a materiality assessment. The Governance and Policy Committee monitors potential risks toretains general oversight responsibility for the effectivenessoverall sustainability program, as well as four focus areas: ethical conduct, community relations, employee health and safety and environmental compliance. The Compensation Committee has general oversight responsibility for human capital resources, including the specific sustainability focus areas of the Board,diversity and inclusion, and employee engagement. The Audit Committee has oversight responsibility for energy management, including director succession and committee composition,greenhouse gas emissions, and the principal policies that guide the company’s governance. The Governance and Policy Committee also considers risks relating to the company’s policies and practices with respect to significant public policy and corporate responsibility matters.

The Finance Committee oversees management of risks associated with proposed strategic transactions. The Finance Committee also monitors our financial policies and strategies to ensure their consistency with our capital budget, annual operating plan and strategic plan. In addition, the FinanceCybersecurity Committee is responsible for monitoringoverseeing cybersecurity. The full Board retains oversight responsibility for product safety and overseeingquality and supply chain management, of risks relating to our capital structure and financial condition, securities issuances, significant borrowing transactions and significant capital expenditures.which the Board already oversees as enterprise risks.

BOARD AND COMMITTEE EVALUATIONS

In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board (under the oversight of the Governance and Policy Committee) conducts an annual assessmentevaluation of the performance of the full Board and delegates to the chairpersons of the individual Board committees the responsibility to conduct evaluations of the performance of the respective committees. The Board evaluation results are reviewedand committees utilize a mix of self-evaluation processes from year to year, ranging from written narrative responses to written questions regarding Board and committee matters to individual interviews with directors conducted by the Chairman of the Board and the respective committee evaluation resultschairpersons to director assessments of their fellow Board members. In 2022, the Board engaged a third party to conduct a Board peer assessment whereby each member of the Board assessed on a confidential basis each of his or her Board peers. The peer assessments were shared with the Board Chairman and HII’s Chief Executive Officer, and the Chairman engaged with each Board member individually regarding his or her assessment results.

DIRECTOR EDUCATION

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that all directors are reviewedencouraged to periodically attend director continuing education programs, and the Board has adopted an informal policy encouraging each director to attend at least one external director education program on a biennial basis. We make available to the Board a roster of continuing director education programs offered by leading director education organizations, facilitate registrations for directors to attend such programs and reimburse directors for expenses incurred to attend such programs.

In addition to encouraging director attendance at external programs, the related committee.Board incorporates a “Board Development” topic into Board meeting agendas on a routine basis. The Board Development topics are

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    27


Governance of the Company

generally presented by internal counsel, external counsel or other experts from outside the company. We track the education programs, both external and internal, that individual directors attend, and the Governance and Policy Committee reviews those reports on at least an annual basis.

POLICY AGAINST HEDGING AND PLEDGING COMPANY SECURITIES

Our insider trading policy prohibits Board members, officers, directorsdirector-level employees and certain other designated employees from engaging in any of the following transactions for their own account: speculative transactions in company securities, pledges of company securities as collateral for a loan or other transaction or hedging transactions involving company securities, including zero cost collar transactions and forward sale contracts.transactions:

speculative transactions in company securities (including trades in puts, calls or other derivative securities or short sales of company securities),

holding company securities in a margin account or pledging company securities as collateral for a loan or other transaction, or

hedging transactions involving company securities (including zero cost collar transactions and forward sale contracts).

CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT

Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which applies to our directors, officers and employees. This code providesidentifies core values, standards and behaviors that guide our officers, directors and employees with guidelines for making ethical decisions while conducting businessin the discharge of their duties and responsibilities on behalf of HII andHII. The code also includes the commitments the company has made to its employees, customers, stockholders, communities and suppliers. The

24    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Governance of the Company

code provides guidance on,addresses, among other matters, conflicts of interest, corporate opportunities, trading in company securities, political contributions and confidential information. Employees are required to report any conduct they believe in good faith is an actual or apparent violation of the code. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct includes provisions applicable to our senior financial officers, as required by SEC rules.

Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on our website at www.huntingtoningalls.com www.hii.com and is available in print to any stockholder requesting a copy. We will post any amendments to our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct on our website.website and/or disclose the amendments in a filing with the SEC. If we waive a provision of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct with respect to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer or principal accounting officer, we will post information about the waiver at the same location on our website.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

None of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board or our Compensation Committee. Accordingly, no interlocks with other companies, within the meaning of the SEC’s proxy rules, existed during 2017.

MEETINGS AND ATTENDANCE

The Board held six meetings in 2017,2022, including five regular meetings and eachone special meetings. All of the regularly scheduled meetings included an executive session of independent directors. In addition, the Board held 2127 committee meetings, comprised of six Audit Committee, five Compensation Committee, six Cybersecurity Committee, five Governance and Policy Committee and five Finance Committee meetings. Each director attended 75% or more of the meetings of the Board and the committees on which he or she served during 2017.2022.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines establishinclude an expectation that all directors will attend our annual meetings of stockholders. All of our directors who were directors or nominees at the time of the 20172022 annual meeting of stockholders attended the annual meeting, except for Ms. Harker, who had a scheduling conflict.meeting.

INDEMNIFICATION

We indemnify our directors and our elected officers to the fullest extent permitted by law, so they can be free from undue concern about personal liability in connection with their service to HII. Our bylaws require this indemnification, and we have also entered into agreements with each director and elected officer contractually obligating us to provide this indemnification to him or her.

 

28    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    25



Communications and Company Documents

 

We welcome communications from our stockholders and other interested parties,stakeholders, and we make information we believe is important to our stockholders and interested partiesother stakeholders available on our website. The following sections describe: how stockholders and other interested partiesstakeholders can communicate with the Board; the information we make available to our stockholders and other interested partiesstakeholders and where you can find that information; and the procedures that stockholders must follow to propose matters for consideration at our annual meetings or to nominate persons for election as directors at our annual meetings.

COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPANY DOCUMENTS

Stockholders and other interested partiesstakeholders can communicate with the Board, ournon-executive Chairman, our independent directors as a group, individual directors or any of the standing Board committees in care of the Corporate Secretary, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 4101 Washington Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 23607. At the direction of the Board, all mail received may be opened and screened for security purposes.

Communications from stockholders and other interested partiesstakeholders are distributed to the Board, athe applicable Board committee or an individual director or directors, as appropriate, depending on the facts and circumstances of the communication. The Board has requested that certain items unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board be excluded or redirected, as appropriate, such as: business solicitations or advertisements; junk mail and mass mailings; resumes and other forms of job inquiries; and surveys. In addition, communications that are unduly hostile, threatening or similarly unsuitable will be excluded. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any communication will be made available to any director upon his or her request.

Our website contains our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, Certificates of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation, Restated Bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines, standing Board committee charters and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. To view these documents, go to www.huntingtoningalls.com www.hii.com, click on “Investor Relations,“Investors,” the “Company Information”“Company” drop-down box and then “Leadership &“Corporate Governance.” We will post any amendments to our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct on our website.website and/or disclose the amendments in a filing with the SEC. If we waive a provision of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct with respect to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer or principal accounting officer, we will post information about the waiver at the same location on our website. To view our SEC filings and Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed by our directors and executive officers, go to www.huntingtoningalls.com www.hii.com, click on “Investor Relations,“Investors,” the “Financial Information”“Financials” drop-down box and then “SEC Filings.”

We will promptly deliver free of charge to any requesting stockholder a copy of our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172022 (without exhibits), Corporate Governance Guidelines, standing Board committee charters and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. Requests should be directed to: Corporate Secretary, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 4101 Washington Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 23607.

You can also print copies of these documents from our website at www.huntingtoningalls.com www.hii.com. We include our website address in the proxy statement only as an inactive textual reference and do not intend it to be an active link to our website. The information on our website is not a part of this proxy statement.

FUTURE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS OF DIRECTORS

Stockholders may present proposals for consideration at a future meeting of stockholders only if they comply with the requirements of the proxy rules established by the SEC and the requirements of our bylaws.

 

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    29

26    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Communications and Company Documents

 

Under SEC Rule14a-8, if a stockholder wants us to include a proposal in our proxy statement and form of proxy for presentation at our 20192024 annual meeting of stockholders, the proposal must be received by us by November 20, 2018,21, 2023, at our principal executive offices located at Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 4101 Washington Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 23607. The proposal should be sent to the attention of the Corporate Secretary.

Article II, Section 2.08 of our bylaws contains the procedures that a stockholder must follow to nominate persons for election as directors or to introduce an item of business at an annual meeting of stockholders outside of SEC Rule14a-8. Assuming that our 20192024 annual meeting is held within 30 days before or after the anniversary of the 20182023 annual meeting (May 2, 2018)2023), we must receive the notice of your intention to introduce a nomination or to propose an item of business at our 20192024 annual meeting not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days in advance of the anniversary of the date on which we first mailed the proxy materials for our 20182023 annual meeting (March 20, 2018)2023), or between November 20, 201821, 2023 and December 20, 2018.21, 2023.

The notice must be submitted in writing to our principal executive offices located at Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 4101 Washington Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 23607. The notice should be sent to the attention of the Corporate Secretary. Our bylaws specify the information that must be contained in the notice. Our bylaws are posted on our website, www.huntingtoningalls.com www.hii.com, and can be accessed by clicking “Investor Relations,“Investors,” the “Company Information”“Company” drop-down box and then “Leadership &“Corporate Governance.”

Article II, Section 2.15 of our bylaws contains the procedures eligible stockholders must follow to nominate persons for election as directors and to have those candidates included in our proxy materials (proxy access). Assuming that our 20192024 annual meeting of stockholders is held within 30 days before or after the anniversary of the 20182023 annual meeting (May 2, 2018)2023), we must receive the notice of your intention to make a proxy access nomination not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days in advance of the anniversary of the date on which we first mailed the proxy materials for our 20182023 annual meeting (March 20, 2018)2023), or between October 21, 201822, 2023 and November 20, 2018.21, 2023.

30    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Sustainability

 

2018 Notice

HII’s mission is to deliver the world’s most powerful ships and Proxy Statement    27

all domain solutions in service of the nation, creating the advantage for its customers to protect peace and freedom around the world.

On March 31, 2011, HII formed as an independent, publicly-traded company when two legacy shipyards joined forces to become the nation’s largest shipbuilder. Since then, HII’s portfolio has expanded further with the establishment of a third division that delivers all-domain technology solutions to civil, commercial and defense customers both domestically and internationally. HII is the largest industrial employer in both Virginia, where the company is headquartered, and in Mississippi.

At HII, the mission is always the primary focus and point of convergence. Since its inception, HII has articulated its commitment to being a responsible corporation that prioritizes operating in a manner that is consistent with its values—integrity, safety, respect, engagement, responsibility and performance.

Board Oversight

The Board and its committees seek to ensure that environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) principles are integrated into our business strategy in ways that optimize opportunities to make positive impacts while advancing long-term goals. We are committed to conducting our business in a safe, environmentally responsible and sustainable manner, and in a way that reflects our responsibilities to our stakeholders.

In 2022, we formalized our sustainability commitment to our stakeholders and appointed our first-ever chief sustainability officer to develop and execute an enterprise-wide sustainability strategy, in which ESG issues converge. The chief sustainability officer chairs HII’s Corporate Sustainability Committee, and is supported on a day-to-day basis by a director-level and cross-functional Sustainability Management Team. The chief sustainability officer is a member of the company’s senior leadership team and reports directly to HII’s CEO on sustainability program performance.

Key Stakeholders

Our key stakeholders are our employees, customers, stockholders, communities and suppliers, and our commitment to key stakeholders is articulated in our sustainability strategy.

Employees – Today, HII is a global, all-domain defense provider with a contract backlog of more than $47 billion and approximately 43,000 employees. HII is committed to a values-driven culture of ethics that puts employees’ safety and well-being first. HII is committed to building a diverse and inclusive environment, offering opportunities for training and career growth, where the least empowered person in the room feels free to speak up. HII is committed to a safe and respectful culture for all employees, united in the company’s mission of service.

Customers – HII supports its highly-valued and ever-growing customer base by seeking to ensure the company meets or exceeds customer interests, delivering quality products and services on time, and always fostering continuous improvement.

Stockholders – HII sustains long-term value and growth in the company through improved performance and intense focus on delivering excellent results.

Communities – HII strives to be an active, visible and positive corporate citizen in every community in which it does business, because its employees make up those communities.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    31


Sustainability

Suppliers – HII engages with its suppliers in a transparent and respectful manner, recognizing that suppliers are an integral part the HII team—essential to the company’s ability to achieve its business objectives.

Because of and through these commitments, sustainability at HII is more than a buzzword; it describes HII’s values-based business model and reflects HII’s long and distinguished history of corporate responsibility, including corporate citizenship and corporate sustainability. Grounded in the company’s mission, values and purpose (together known as “MVP”), HII’s MVP approach to sustainability guides its strategy, structural polices and programming, and animates its culture of service and ethics. These principles come to life in HII’s daily decision-making and behaviors, and in its formal frameworks and processes. With HII’s values as its north star, the company’s sustainability strategy is optimized to yield long-term competitive advantages, stockholder value, and positive impact for its people, facilities, communities and environment – all in service of its mission. To carry true meaning, HII’s sustainability strategy relies on public reporting standards widely recognized as ESG. Given this usage, HII refers to ESG as its framework for reporting on the initiatives it undertakes as a company, the goals it sets and the progress it has made. HII’s values-based approach connects its performance in priority areas to who it is as a company.

Sustainability Focus Areas

Through interviews, surveys and intensive document and resource reviews, together referred to as “HII’s priority assessment,” the following sustainability focus areas emerged:

Diversity and inclusion, including Board of Directors and workforce diversity, supplier diversity and company culture.

Energy management, including the management of GHG emissions, efficiencies focused on current energy use, renewable energy deployment and the types and ways that fuel is consumed.

Supply chain management, including how HII engages with its suppliers through a Supplier Code of Conduct and supplier standards, supply chain transparency, risk assessments and audits, as well as how we maintain supply chain continuity and resiliency.

Ethical conduct, including ethics guidelines and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct training, compliance with regulations and laws, grievance and whistleblower mechanisms, and anti-corruption, anti-bribery and anti-money laundering policies and risk analysis.

Product quality and safety, including product lifecycle management, improper product usage, environmental impact considerations of products, efforts to ensure product safety, compliance with product safety laws and regulations and product end-of-life management.

Cybersecurity, including cybersecurity investments, compliance, risk assessments and awareness (such as phishing, social engineering and advanced cyber tactics), as well as the company’s responses to cyber-attacks and degradation.

Community relations, including how we engage with and support the communities in which we operate through employee volunteering, relationship-building with local communities, local economic impact, philanthropy, future workforce development and community education programming.

Employee engagement, including company culture, employee turnover, recruitment and retention, compensation and benefits and employee satisfaction.

Health and safety, including occupational health and safety initiatives, policies and training, as well as adherence to safety laws and regulations, health and wellness programs and workplace culture.

32    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Sustainability

Environmental compliance, including how HII supports and engages with its regulators, efforts to ensure compliance, and adherence to environmental laws and regulations.

HII’s sustainability strategy further enhances the company’s longstanding commitment to performing with integrity. HII’s award-winning ethics and compliance program ensures adequate controls are in place to reduce the opportunity for misconduct. Furthermore, HII is committed to working with suppliers who share the company’s values and conduct their business in a legal and ethical manner. HII expects its suppliers to comply with the company’s guidelines and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, and suppliers are expected to comply with applicable laws and regulations, including those relating to labor and employment practices, health and safety, and environmental protection.

HII uses the concept of “responsible sourcing” in supply chain management. This approach reflects HII’s voluntary commitment to account for social and environmental risks when managing relationships with its suppliers. When contracting with a supplier, HII is explicit in expressing its expectation that the supplier will comply with all applicable laws and regulations, specifically including labor and environmental laws. HII has implemented and maintains several policies in these areas of supply chain risk, including: conflict minerals (HII’s policy mandates that supplier terms and conditions require suppliers to disclose information about any conflict minerals contained in components or items purchased by HII for inclusion in HII’s products sold to third parties, and ensures the collection and maintenance of product information from suppliers and vendors); human trafficking (HII recognizes slavery in the supply chain can take many forms, including human trafficking, child labor and debt bondage. It is HII policy to support unequivocally the elimination of human trafficking and slavery. HII is also committed to complying with the U.K. Modern Slavery Act of 2015 and the Australian Commonwealth Modern Slavery Act of 2018); and diversity of suppliers (HII uses best efforts to enhance subcontracting opportunities for specially defined classes of small business as subcontractors, in compliance with all laws and regulations, as stated in the Small Business Act, Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), Public Laws 95-507, 105-35, 106-50, and 15 U.S.C § 631, et. seq.).

Consistent with HII’s commitment to provide stakeholders with transparency into its sustainability objectives, performance and progress, HII’s 2022 Sustainability Reportreferences to Global Reporting Initiative (“GRI”) Standards, including a GRI Standards Index, as well as the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Standard framework. HII will consider other reporting standards and frameworks in the future, as its sustainability program continues to mature.

For more detailed information on HII’s sustainability program and HII’s 2022 Sustainability Report and other ESG-related resources, go to hii.com, click on the “Company” drop-down box and then “Sustainability.”

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    33


The Board of Directors

 

We believe the qualifications, skills, experience and experiencesattributes of our directors are consistent with our criteria for the selection of directors and that, collectively, our directors have functioned effectively overseeing the businessmanagement of the companyHII over the last year.

Mr. BildenDenault was elected by the Board on November 7, 2017, to fill a vacancy created when the Board increased its size to ten directors.December 5, 2022. He was recommended as a candidate for director by anon-management director. The remaining nine10 directors nominated to stand for election at our 2023 annual meeting have served on the Board since our last annual meeting. All 11 director nominees, if elected, will serve one-year terms expiring at our 2024 annual meeting.

We amended our certificate of incorporation in 2015 to phase out the classificationOur former CEO, C. Michael Petters, retired from his position as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board beginning at our annual meeting held in 2016effective January 1, 2023, and ending at our annual meeting held in 2018. Withphase-outStephen R. Wilson, a current member of the Board classification complete, all tenand Chairman of ourthe Audit Committee, will retire from the Board effective at the time directors will be voted upon at our 2018 annual meeting, and all directorsare elected at our 2018the 2023 annual meeting will serveone-year terms.meeting.

20182022 DIRECTOR NOMINEES

 

PHILIP M. BILDEN

Director since November 2017

Mr. Bilden, age 53, is a private equity investor and recently retiredco-founding member of HarbourVest Partners, LLC.

Positions Held: Mr. Bilden retired in June 2016 as aco-founding member of the private equity firm HarbourVest Partners, a leading global private equity investment management firm with institutional assets under management in excess of $42 billion. He began his career in Boston in 1991 and relocated to Hong Kong in 1996 to establish the firm’s Asian subsidiary. Mr. Bilden was responsible for the firm’s investment strategy and execution, capital-raising and client service activities throughout the Asia Pacific region, managing personnel and partnerships in multiple countries and cultures. Throughout his25-year tenure at HarbourVest Partners, he served in senior leadership roles in the firm’s global management, including the firm’ssix-person executive committee responsible for governance. Mr. Bilden served ten years in the U.S. Army Reserve as a Military Intelligence Officer from 1986 to 1996.

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education:Mr. Bilden currently serves on the Chief of Naval Operations Executive Panel; the board of directors of the United States Naval Academy Foundation; the Board of Visitors, Georgetown University, School of Foreign Service; the Dean’s Board of Advisors and Asia Pacific Advisory Board, Harvard Business School; and the Board of Trustees and Executive Committee as Vice Chairman of the Naval War College Foundation. He is also serving as the inaugural Chairman of the Center for Cyber Conflict Studies Task Force at the Naval War College Foundation and serves on the Advisory Board of Contrast Capital Management, LLC.

Mr. Bilden graduated with a B.S. in Foreign Service (magna cum laude) in 1986 from Georgetown University as a Distinguished Military Graduate, Army Reserve Officer Training Corps. He received his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School in 1991.

Qualifications, Experience, Attributes and Skills: We believe Mr. Bilden is qualified to serve as a director based upon his significant experience founding and building a private equity firm, including his experience serving in senior leadership roles in the firm’s global management. In particular, we believe his international experience and the skills he developed through his responsibility for the firm’s investment strategy, capital-raising and client services activities in the Asia Pacific region will serve the Board well.

28    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


The Board of Directors

LOGO

AUGUSTUS L. COLLINS

Chief Executive Officer of MINACT, Inc.

Director since November 2016

Gen.Business Experience: General Collins age 60, has served as Chief Executive Officer of MINACT, Inc., a business management consulting firm, since September 2016.

Positions Held:From January 2012 to August 2016, Gen. Collinshe was a Major General in the Mississippi National Guard, serving as Adjutant General of both the Mississippi Army National Guard and the Mississippi Air National Guard. From July 2010 to January 2012, Gen.General Collins served as Executive Vice President for Strategic Planning of MINACT. From August 2007 to July 2010, he served on Mississippi’s Workers’ Compensation Commission as the commission’s representative of labor. Gen.General Collins served more than 35 years in the U.S. Army and Mississippi National Guard, which included command of the 155th Brigade Combat Team of the Mississippi National Guard, deploying to Iraq, where he was responsible for security operations in the southern and western provinces.

 

Current Public Company Directorships: General Collins serves on the board of directors of Trustmark Corporation, a bank holding company, and is a member of its Audit Committee, Enterprise Risk Committee and Human Resources Committee.

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education:Gen. General Collins serves on the board of directors of MINACT, Inc., Trustmark National Bank, Mississippi Power Company, a privately-owned corporation in Mississippi,subsidiary of Southern Company, an electric power distribution company, and Armed Forces Benefits Association 5Star Life Insurance. He also serves on the Friends of Mississippi Veterans, a nonprofit entity serving veterans in Mississippi. He is the President-ElectPast President of the University of Mississippi Alumni Association. Gen.General Collins received a B.S. in Business Administration from the University of Mississippi, an M.B.A. from Jackson State University and a Master’s Degree in strategic studies from the U.S. Army War College.

 

Experience, Qualifications, Experience, Attributes and Skills: We believe Gen.General Collins is qualified to serve as a director based upon his 35 years of senior military experience with the U.S. Army and Mississippi National Guard and his experience as a senior executive and then chief executive officernow Chief Executive Officer of MINACT, Inc., a company that contracts with the U.S. government, as well as private sector customers.

 

34    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


The Board of Directors

LOGO

 

LEO P. DENAULT

Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Corporation

Director since December 2022

Business Experience: From February 2013 until November 2022, Mr. Denault served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Corporation. From February 2004 until January 2013, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Entergy Corporation. Mr. Denault served as Vice President, Corporate Development for Entergy Corporation from March 1999 until February 2004. Prior to that, he was Vice President, Corporate Development for Cinergy Corporation (now Duke Energy), an energy company.

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education: Mr. Denault currently serves on the board of directors of Jobs for America’s Graduates. He received a B.S. from Ball State University and a M.B.A. from Indiana University.

Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills: We believe Mr. Denault is qualified to serve as a director based upon his chief executive leadership of a Fortune 500 public company for nearly ten years, as well as his executive experience in the chief financial officer role and, before that, the corporate development role of the same company. We believe Mr. Denault’s multiple executive leadership roles in a public company will add valuable experience and skills to the Board. We also expect his public company chief financial officer experience will be an asset as the Audit Committee transitions to a new chairperson upon the retirement of Mr. Wilson later in 2023.

LOGO

KIRKLAND H. DONALD

Chairman of the Board of HII

Director since January 2017

ADMBusiness Experience: Admiral Donald age 64, has served as an independent business consultantChairman of the Board of HII since January 2013.

Positions Held:Since January 2013, ADM Donald hasApril 2020. Prior to serving as Chairman of the Board, he worked as a business consultant and served on the executive advisory board of Moelis Capital Partners LLC/NexPhase Capital, LP. He serves as a technical advisory board member for NuScale Power, LLC, a CFIUS Security Monitor for LANXESS AG, a voting trustee for Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. and a member of the Submarine Advisory Committee for the Government of Australia.consultant. From January 2014June 2013 to October 2015, ADMAdmiral Donald served as chief executive officer,Chief Operating Officer and from June 2013 to January 2014 as chief operating officer,then President and Chief Executive Officer of Systems Planning and Analysis, Inc., a technical professional services company. Prior to that, ADMAdmiral Donald served 37 years in the U.S. Navy. InNavy, including in his last assignment, he served as director of the naval nuclear propulsion programDirector, Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program from November 2004 to November 2012.

 

Current Public Company Directorships:ADM Admiral Donald has served on the board of directors of Entergy Corporation since June 2013,2013. He is Chairman of its Nuclear Committee and serves ona member of its Finance CommitteeCommittee. He has also served on the board of directors of Centrus Energy Corporation, a nuclear energy company, since June 2021 and Nuclearis a member of its Technology, Competition and Regulatory Committee.

 

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education: ADM Admiral Donald currently serves on the boards of directors of Battelle Memorial Institute, CybercoreCyberCore Technologies, LLC, a secure supply chain solutions company, and the Naval Submarine League. He is also an outside director (on a “proxy” board) of Rolls-Royce North America and Sauer Compressors USA and a CFIUS security monitor for LANXESS Corporation, all of which are suppliers to HII. Admiral Donald is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, holding a B.S. in Ocean Engineering. ADMAdmiral Donald also received an M.B.A. from the University of Phoenix and completed Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government Senior Executive Fellows Program. He holds the CERT certificate in cybersecurity oversight from Carnegie Mellon University.

 

Experience, Qualifications, Experience, Attributes and Skills: We believe ADMAdmiral Donald is qualified to serve as a director based upon his 37 years of senior military experience with the U.S. Navy, the last eight years of which he served as director of the naval nuclear propulsion program, his experience serving on the boards of directors of other public and private companies and his experience serving as a senior operating officer and chief executive officer of a private company that provides services primarily to the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

 

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    35

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    29


The Board of Directors

 

THOMAS B. FARGO

Director since March 2011

ADM Fargo, age 69, is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. and has served in that capacity since March 2011.LOGO

 

Positions Held:ADM Fargo has led companies in both the transportation and research and development sectors. He served as Commander of the U.S. Pacific Command, leading the largest unified command while directing the joint operations of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force from May 2002 until his retirement from the U.S. Navy in March 2005. His 35 years of service included six tours in Washington, D.C. and five commands in the Pacific, Indian Ocean and Middle East, which includedCommander-in-Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, Commander Fifth Fleet and Naval Forces of the Central Command.

Current Public Company Directorships:ADM Fargo serves as a director and Chair of the Audit Committee of Matson, Inc. and serves on the boards of directors of The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. and Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.

Prior Public Company Directorships (within the last five years):ADM Fargo served on the board of directors of Northrop Grumman Corporation, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. (Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.), including as Chairman of its Compensation Committee.

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education:ADM Fargo serves on the boards of directors of United Services Automobile Association (USAA), the U.S. Naval Academy Foundation, the Japan-America Society of Hawaii, the Iolani School Board of Governors and the Friends of Hawaii Charities. He is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy.

Qualifications, Experience, Attributes and Skills:We believe ADM Fargo is qualified to serve as a director based upon his service as Commander of the largest military command in the world and his senior military, government and operations expertise. His public company board experience has given him expertise in corporate governance, aerospace and defense, transportation and finance. ADM Fargo has received formal training in board service at Harvard University and Stanford University. He also possesses specialized knowledge in both national and homeland security that is directly relevant to our core business and customers.

VICTORIA D. HARKER

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

of Tegna, Inc.

Director since August 2012

Business Experience:Ms. Harker age 53, is anhas served as Executive Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer of Tegna, Inc.

Positions Held:Ms. Harker (“Tegna”), a media company, since June 2015. She began serving in her current position in June 2015, when Tegna separated from Gannett Co., Inc. (“Gannett”). Prior to that and from July 2012, she served as Chief Financial Officer of Gannett. Ms. Harker served as Chief Financial Officer from 2006 to 2012 and as President of Global Business Services from 2011 to 2012 of The AES Corporation (“AES”), a multinational power company. Before joining AES, she was the acting Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of MCI, Inc., a telecommunications company, from November 2002 through January 2006, and Chief Financial Officer of MCI Group, a unit of Worldcom, Inc., a communications company, from 1998 to 2002.

 

Current Public Company Directorships:Ms. Harker serves on the board of directors of Xylem, Inc. (formerly ITT)ITT Corporation), a global water infrastructure company, and as Chair of its Audit & Finance Committee and a member of its Leadership DevelopmentNominating and CompensationGovernance Committee.

 

Prior Public Company Directorships (withinDirectorships: Ms. Harker served on the last five years):Ms. Harkerboard of directors and as a member of the Audit Committee of Stride, Inc., an education company, from 2020 to 2022. She served on the board of directors and as a member of the Finance and Audit Committees of the Board of Darden Restaurants, Inc., a restaurants company, from 2009 to 2014.

 

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education:Ms. Harker is a member of the University of Virginia’s Board of Visitors, where she chairs the Finance Committee and serves as a member of the Executive Committee, the Special Committee on Governance and the Committee on the University of Virginia’s College at Wise. She is a trustee of the University of Virginia Alumni Association’s $250M Jefferson Trust and participates as an emeritus society member of the Board of Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing Arts. Ms. Harker received a B.A. from the University of Virginia and an M.B.A. from American University.

 

Experience, Qualifications, Experience, Attributes and Skills:We believe Ms. Harker is qualified to serve as a director based upon the significant experience in business and finance she has accumulated serving as chief financial officer and in other senior management positions with large publicly-tradedpublicly traded companies, as well as her experience serving on boards and board committees of other publicly-tradedpublicly traded companies.

LOGO

 

FRANK R. JIMENEZ

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of GE HealthCare

Director since January 2022

Business Experience: Mr. Jimenez has served as General Counsel of GE HealthCare, a medical device manufacturing and pharmaceuticals company, since February 2022 and additionally as Corporate Secretary since January 2023 following GE HealthCare’s spin-off from the General Electric Company. From April 2020 until he assumed his current position, Mr. Jimenez served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel (April 2020 to December 2021) and Special Advisor to the Chairman and CEO (December 2021 to February 2022) of Raytheon Technologies Corporation. From January 2015 until its merger with United Technologies Corporation in April 2020, he served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Raytheon Company. From July 2012 until January 2015, Mr. Jimenez served as General Counsel, Secretary and Managing Director, Corporate Affairs of Bunge Limited, an agribusiness and food company. Previously, he served as Vice President and General Counsel of ITT Corporation and as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Xylem Inc., a spin-off of ITT Corporation.

In prior public service, Mr. Jimenez served as the 21st General Counsel of the Navy, Deputy General Counsel (Legal Counsel) for the U.S. Department of Defense, Principal Deputy General Counsel of the Navy, Chief of Staff at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for Secretary Mel Martinez, and Deputy Chief of Staff and Acting General Counsel for Florida Governor Jeb Bush. Before entering government service, Mr. Jimenez was a litigation partner at Steel Hector and Davis LLP (now Squire Patton Boggs LLP). He began his legal career with a clerkship in the chambers of Judge Pamela Ann Rymer of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Pasadena, California.

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education: Mr. Jimenez’s past and present civic service includes membership on the boards of the University of Miami, Equal Justice Works, the Pro Bono Partnership, the Atlantic Legal Foundation, the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, the Yale Law School Fund, the Yale Law School Association, the Yale Law School Center for the Study of Corporate Law, PioneerLegal and the Miami Christian School.

Mr. Jimenez received a B.S. from the University of Miami and a J.D. from Yale Law School. He also received an M.B.A. in finance and strategic management from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School and an M.A. in national security and strategic studies from the U.S. Naval War College, with an emphasis in the law of armed conflict. Mr. Jimenez is admitted to the bars of Florida, the District of Columbia, New York and the U.S. Supreme Court.

Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills: We believe Mr. Jimenez is qualified to serve as a director based upon his experience as the most senior legal officer of one of the largest aerospace and defense companies in the United States, as well as the most senior legal officer of three other S&P 500 companies. We believe Mr. Jimenez will also add skills and experience to the Board as a result of his significant experience inside the federal government, including his service as General Counsel of the Navy, our largest customer, and Deputy General Counsel for the Department of Defense.

 

36    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

30    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


The Board of Directors

 

LOGO

CHRISTOPHER D. KASTNER

President and Chief Executive Officer of Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

Director since March 2022

Business Experience: Mr. Kastner was elected President and Chief Executive Officer of HII effective March 1, 2022. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from February 2021. In that role, he oversaw operations at HII’s three business segments and worked closely with segment management to drive execution on the company’s historic backlog. Mr. Kastner served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from March 2016 to February 2021. In that role, he was responsible for directing the business strategy and processes in support of business growth and profitability goals. Mr. Kastner also had responsibility for corporate business management functions, including investor relations, treasury, internal audit, contracts, accounting, financial reporting, planning and analysis, rates and budgets and mergers and acquisitions. He also provided oversight for segment business management, contracts and estimating and pricing.

From August 2012 until he became Chief Financial Officer of HII, Mr. Kastner served as Corporate Vice President and General Manager, Corporate Development, responsible for strategy and development activities, including the development and integration of strategic planning efforts, as well as the analysis and entrance into new adjacent markets. Prior to that and from March 2011, he served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of our Ingalls Shipbuilding segment. Before that and from 2008, Mr. Kastner served as Vice President, Business Management and Chief Financial Officer of Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Gulf Coast, and served as Vice President, Contracts and Risk Management of Northrop Grumman Ship Systems from 2006 to 2008. Prior to that, he held several positions at other Northrop Grumman businesses, including Corporate Director of Strategic Transactions.

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education: Mr. Kastner holds a B.A. in Political Science from the University of California at Santa Barbara and an M.B.A. from Pepperdine University. He serves on the board of directors of WHRO, the only public broadcasting station in the United States owned by a collaboration of 19 local public school districts, and on the board of trustees for Eastern Virginia Medical School.

Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills: We believe Mr. Kastner is qualified to serve as a director based upon his experience as HII’s Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and head of corporate strategy and development, as well as his experience in operations at our Ingalls Shipbuilding segment and its predecessor company as Chief Financial Officer and, before that, Vice President, Contracts and Risk Management.

LOGO

ANASTASIA D. KELLY

Senior Advisor to the Chair and Executive Director of Client Relations of DLA Piper

Director since March 2011

Business Experience:Ms. Kelly age 68, ishas served as Senior Advisor to the Chair and Executive Director of Client Relations of DLA Piper, aCo-Managing law firm, since April 2020. Prior to assuming her current position, Ms. Kelly served as Managing Partner of DLA Piper Americas.

Positions Held:Ms. Kelly has servedAmericas from 2018, asCo-Managing Partner of DLA Piper sincefrom 2013 to 2018 and as a partner since 2010. Prior to joining DLA Piper, Ms. Kelly was an executive officer of American International Group, Inc., a finance and insurance company, from 2006 to 2010, serving as Executive Vice President and General Counsel from 2006 to January 2009 and as Vice Chairman until December 2009, positions for which she was responsible for addressing legal, regulatory, corporate governance and risk management issues. Prior to joining American International Group, Ms. Kelly was an executive and general counsel of several large, publicly-tradedpublicly traded companies, including MCI WorldCom, Inc., Sears, Roebuck and Co., a department store company, and Fannie Mae.Federal National Mortgage Association, a finance company.

 

CurrentPrior Public Company Directorships:Ms. Kelly servesserved as a director and Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee and a member of the Risk Committee of Owens-Illinois,Owens- Illinois, Inc., the world’s largest manufacturer of glass containers.containers, from 1992 until 2022.

 

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education:Ms. Kelly serves on the boards of numerous philanthropic organizations. Sheorganizations and serves as a director of the Cardiovascular Institute at George Washington University Hospital, and is a member of the Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Law School. Ms. KellyMedical Faculty Associates. She is also past Chair of Equal Justice Works and a director of Lawyers for Children America. She was a director of Saxon Capital from 2005 to 2007. Ms. Kelly received a B.A., cum laude, from Trinity University and a J.D., magna cum laude, from The George Washington University Law School. She is a member of the Texas Bar and the District of Columbia Bar and a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation.

 

Experience, Qualifications, Experience, Attributes and Skills:We believe Ms. Kelly is qualified to serve as a director based upon her many years of experience as a senior executive and general counsel of several large, publicly traded companies, her experience as a director of another public company, and her varied business and legal experience.

 

C. MICHAEL PETTERS

Director since March 2011

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    37


The Board of Directors

 

LOGO

Mr. Petters, age 58, is President and

TRACY B. MCKIBBEN

Founder & Chief Executive Officer of Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.MAC Energy Advisors LLC

Director since December 2018

Business Experience: Ms. McKibben is the founder and has served as the Chief Executive Officer since 2010 of MAC Energy Advisors LLC, an investment and consulting company that provides integrated energy solutions for investments and strategic opportunities across a global platform. She is an international energy and environmental technology expert with more than 20 years of experience in such capacity since March 2011.

Positions Held:Mr. Pettersthe energy sector, including alternative energy, renewable energy, green technology, water and energy efficiency. Prior to her current position, Ms. McKibben served as PresidentManaging Director and Head of Northrop Grumman ShipbuildingEnvironmental Banking Strategy at Citicorp Global Markets from 2008, when it was formed,September 2007 to August 2009. She also served on the board of directors of ECP Environmental Growth Opportunities Corp., a special purpose acquisition company, until 2011, when it was spun offits merger with an operating company. Ms. McKibben served on the National Security Council at the White House from July 2003 to form HII. Prior to that, he was PresidentAugust 2007 as Director of Northrop Grumman Newport News beginningEuropean Economic Affairs and European Union Relations and as Acting Senior Director for European Affairs. Before joining the National Security Council, Ms. McKibben served in 2004. Since joining Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company in 1987, his responsibilities have included oversight of theVirginia-class submarine program, the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier programs, aircraft carrier overhaul and refueling, submarine fleet maintenance, commercial and naval ship repair, human resources and business and technology development. During his servicevarious senior advisory roles in the U.S. Navy, Mr. Petters served aboard the nuclear-powered submarine USSBancroft, and he spent five yearsDepartment of Commerce from March 2001 to July 2003. Prior to her work in the Naval Reserve.public sector, she practiced law at Akin, Gump, Strauss & Feld LLP.

 

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education:Mr. PettersCurrent Public Company Directorships: Ms. McKibben serves on the board of directors of the U.S. Naval Academy Foundation, the National BureauEcolab Inc., a chemicals company, and serves as a member of Asian Researchits Audit Committee and the Virginia Community College Foundation. HeFinance Committee.

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education: Ms. McKibben serves on the Board of Advisors toDirectors of United Services Automobile Association (USAA), a financial services company, and the Center for a New American Security and The Executive CommitteeBoard of Trustees of the Aerospace Industries Association, andNew York Power Authority. She is Chairmana member of the Virginia Business Council. HeCouncil on Foreign Relations. Ms. McKibben received a B.S. in PhysicsB.A. from the U.S. Naval AcademyWest Virginia State University and an M.B.A.a J.D. from the College of William and Mary.

Harvard Law School.

 

Experience, Qualifications, Experience, Attributes and Skills:We believe Mr. PettersMs. McKibben is qualified to serve as a director based upon hisher experience as our Presidentthe founder and Chief Executive Officer hisof an investment and consulting company operating in the energy market and her senior leadership experience at a leading investment banking firm, as President of our predecessor companies, hiswell as her experience in senior leadership positions in a presidential administration. We also believe Ms. McKibben’s experience serving on the boards of directors of other public companies and serving as a member of the audit committee and finance committee of other public company boards complements her qualifications to serve on our Board.

LOGO

STEPHANIE L. O’SULLIVAN

Independent Business Consultant

Director since January 2021

Business Experience: Ms. O’Sullivan has served as an independent business consultant since January 2017. Prior to serving as an independent business consultant, Ms. O’Sullivan served as Principal Deputy Director of the Office of National Intelligence from February 2011 until January 2017. In that position, she assisted the Director of National Intelligence in the management of day-to-dayoperations and other seniorof the intelligence community. From December 2009 until February 2011, Ms. O’Sullivan served as the Associate Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”). Prior to that appointment, she held several management positions in the CIA’s Directorate of our predecessor companiesScience and his military experienceTechnology, working to develop and deploy innovative technology in support of intelligence collection and analysis.

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education: Ms. O’Sullivan currently serves on the boards of directors of The Aerospace Corporation, Battelle Memorial Institute and HRL Laboratories (formerly Hughes Research Laboratories), the board of trustees of IQT (In-Q-Tel), the Accenture Federal Services proxy board and the CIA Officers Memorial Foundation board of directors. She has also served on advisory boards at Google, Adobe Inc., Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Noblis, Peraton and Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. Ms. O’Sullivan has been an adjunct faculty member at Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology and continues to support study activities for the Department of Defense, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the CIA. She was elected a member of the National Academy of Engineering in 2019. Ms. Sullivan received a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Missouri Science and Technology University.

Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills: We believe Ms. O’Sullivan is qualified to serve as a naval officer.

director based upon her extensive experience with our primary customer as a long-served senior civilian in the U.S. government and her highly successful career culminating in assignments in the most senior levels of government. We believe she also adds to the Board broad experience in the fields of command, control and intelligence for the U.S. government, which are areas of importance to our Defense and Federal Solutions business unit in our growing Technical Solutions business segment. In addition, Ms. O’Sullivan is a demonstrated governance professional based upon her experience in the board environment of private organizations.

 

38    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    31


The Board of Directors

 

LOGO

THOMAS C. SCHIEVELBEIN

Retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Brink’s Company

Director since March 2011

Business Experience:Mr. Schievelbein age 64, served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Brink’s Company, a security company, from June 2012 until his retirement in May 2016.

Positions Held:Mr. Schievelbein He served as President of Northrop Grumman Newport News and was a member of the Northrop Grumman Corporate Policy Council from November 2001 until November 2004. HeMr. Schievelbein served as Chief Operating Officer of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. from 1995 until 2001 and was responsible for the design, construction and maintenance of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines. His experience includes theVirginia-class submarine program,CVN-76,CVN-77 andCVN-21 aircraft carrier programs, aircraft carrier overhaul and refueling, submarine fleet maintenance, commercial and naval ship repair and business development.

 

Current Public Company Directorships:Mr. Schievelbein has served on the board of directors of New York Life Insurance Co. since 2006 and currently serves as Chairmanthe Lead Director, as well as a member of the Compensation Committee, and a member of the Investment Committee and the Governance and Policy Committee.

 

Prior Public Company Directorships (within the last five years):Directorships:Mr. Schievelbein previously served on the board of directors of The Brink’s Company from March 2009 until his retirement in May 2016, serving as Chairman of that board from June 2012. Before serving as Chairman, he served as a member of its Audit and Compensation Committees. Mr. Schievelbein served on the board of directors of McDermott International Inc., an engineering company, from 2004 to 2012.

 

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education:Mr. Schievelbein is a past member of the Secretary of the Navy’s Advisory Panel and was a director of the U.S. Naval Academy Foundation from 2004 through 2012. He received a B.S. in Marine Engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy and a Master’s Degree in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Virginia.

 

Experience, Qualifications, Experience, Attributes and Skills: We believe Mr. Schievelbein is qualified to serve as a director based upon his experience as the President and Chief Operating Officer of Northrop Grumman Newport News and Chief Operating Officer of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc., his prior experience as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of a public company and his experience serving as a director of other public companies.

LOGO

 

JOHN K. WELCH

Retired President and Chief Executive Officer of Centrus Energy Corp.
(formerly USEC Inc.)

Director since February 2015

Business Experience:Mr. Welch age 68, wasserved as President and Chief Executive Officer of Centrus Energy Corp. (formerly USEC Inc.) from October 2005 until his retirement in October 2014.

Positions Held:He was previously a senior executive with General Dynamics Corporation, an aerospace and defense company, retiring from the company in 2003 as Executive Vice President for the Marine Systems Group, which included Bath Iron Works, Electric Boat and National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (NASSCO). During his career with General Dynamics, which began in 1989, Mr. Welch also served as President of Electric Boat, Vice President of Programs for Electric Boat, with responsibility for new construction, overhaul and repair programs, material acquisition and information technology, and Vice President for Program Development at Electric Boat, with responsibility for strategic planning, program and product marketing and high-technology program acquisition and management. Mr. Welch served over seven years on active duty with the U.S. Navy as a nuclear submarine officer and retired from the Naval Reserve.

 

Prior Public Company Directorships (within the last five years):Directorships:Mr. Welch served on the board of directors of Centrus Energy Corp. and its predecessor, USEC Inc., from 2005 until 2013.

 

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education:Mr. Welch is retired Chairman of the Board of Battelle Memorial Institute and serves on the boards of Novawall Systems Incorporated and Mount St. Joseph High School. He received a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy, a Master’s Degree in Aeronautical Engineering from the Naval Postgraduate School and an M.B.A. from Loyola College.

 

Experience, Qualifications, Experience, Attributes and Skills: We believe Mr. Welch is qualified to serve as a director based upon his senior executive experience at other public companies in the shipbuilding and energy markets, including his experience as executive vice president of the primary competitor to our core shipbuilding business. Mr. Welch also brings experience as a director of other public and private companies andnot-for-profit entities.

 

Additional Information. Mr. Welch is the retired President and Chief Executive Officer of Centrus Energy Corp. (formerly USEC Inc.). Centrus Energy filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy code on March 5, 2014. On September 30, 2014, Centrus Energy emerged from Chapter 11, prior to Mr. Welch’s retirement from the company.

 

32    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


The Board of Directors

STEPHEN R. WILSON

Director since October 2015

Mr. Wilson, age 71, is an independent business consultant

2023 Notice and retired Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of RJR Nabisco, Inc.

Positions Held:Mr. Wilson has served in general management, finance and planning capacities at major companies for nearly 30 years. Since 2015, he has served as an independent consultant at Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., a global insurance brokerage and risk management services firm. Prior to that, Mr. Wilson was an independent consultant at Brock Capital Group LLC, an investment bank, from 2010 until 2014. He was a partner at Camelot Equity Partners from 2007 until 2010. Mr. Wilson has also served in various executive roles, including as: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of RJR Nabisco, Inc.; Chief Financial Officer of Pepsi Cola USA; Chief Financial Officer ofFrito-Lay International and President ofFrito-Lay Brazil; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and, later, President of Cadbury Beverages North America; and Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer and, later, Chief Administrative Officer of Footstar, Inc.

Prior Public Company Directorships:Mr. Wilson served on the board of directors of Newport News Shipbuilding, Inc. from 1996 until the company was acquired by Northrop Grumman Corporation in 2002. He also served as chairman of the Audit Committee and as a member of the Compensation and Executive Committees. Mr. Wilson served on the board of directors of Majesco Entertainment Company from 2006 through 2015 and as chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Audit Committee.

Other Directorships and Memberships and Education:Mr. Wilson currently serves on the board of directors of Blue Man Productions. He previously served: as Finance Director and on the board of directors of Reckitt & Colman PLC; on the statutory board of Natwest Bancorp North America; on the board of directors of Middlesex Mutual Assurance; on the national advisory board of LEK Consulting; on the national advisory board of Chase Bank; on the national advisory board of Parson Consulting; and on the board of directors of Knobias, Inc. Mr. Wilson currently serves on the board of directors of Blue School and previously served on the boards of the South Bronx Educational Foundation and the Manhattan Theatre Club. He graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy, served as a Lieutenant in the U.S. Navy and received an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School.

Proxy Statement    

Qualifications, Experience, Attributes and Skills:We believe Mr. Wilson is qualified to serve as a director based upon his experience as chief financial officer, and chief executive officer of significant operating units, of several large public companies and his prior service on the board of directors of Newport News Shipbuilding, prior to its acquisition by Northrop Grumman, and more recently on the board of another public company.

39


 

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    33


Director Compensation

 

Compensation elements for the Board of Directors are designed to:

 

promote alignment with long-term stockholder interests;

promote alignment with long-term stockholder interests;

 

enable us to attract and retain outstanding directors who meet the criteria described under “Governance of the Company” above;

enable us to attract and retain outstanding directors who meet the criteria described under “Governance of the Company” above;

 

recognize the substantial time commitments necessary to oversee the business of our company; and

recognize the substantial time commitments necessary to oversee HII’s business; and

 

support the independence of thought and action expected of directors.

support the independence of thought and action expected of directors.

Non-employee director compensation is evaluated annually by the Compensation Committee, which makes recommendations to the full Board for consideration and approval. In its 20172022, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, Exequity LLP (“Exequity”), conducted an assessment of the competitive market with respect to outside director compensation, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, Exequity LLP (“Exequity”),compensation. Exequity’s assessment considered the following director compensation elements: board-related pay, committee-related pay, equity pay, total director compensation and chairman of the board compensation. Based upon an analysis of the 1514 companies that comprise the peer group for our 20172022 NEO compensation analysis, as well as supplemental general industry data gathered from Fortune 500 companies, Exequity concluded that HII’s outside director total compensation trailed the median of our peer group.

In response to the results of the director compensation analysis, Exequity proposed increasing the equity compensation of Board members and cash retainers for chairs and members of the standing Board committees, to align HII’s director compensation with the median of our compensation peer group. The Compensation Committee accepted the recommendations of Exequity and recommended that the Board approve an amended and restated directors’ compensation policy, which the Board approved. The following section sets forth the director compensation under the amended and restated policy.is competitive within its market. Our CEO is not paid additional compensation for his service on ourthe Board.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Our director compensation program fornon-employee directors is comprised of both cash retainers and equity awards in the form of either restricted stock units or shares of our common stock, in each case granted under our 20122022 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan.

Non-employee directors receive an annual cash retainer of $100,000. Ournon-executive Chairman ofThe following table sets forth the Board receives an additional annual cash retainer of $250,000. The additional annual cash retainers for serving as chairs of our standing Board committees are: $25,000 for Audit; $20,000 for Compensation; $20,000 for Governance and Policy; and $20,000 for Finance. The additionalmembers:

   Annual Cash Retainer*
Non-employee Directors   $100,000
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board   $350,000
Chairpersons of our Standing Board Committees   

Audit

   $25,000

Compensation

   $20,000

Cybersecurity

   $20,000

Governance and Policy

   $20,000

Finance

   $20,000
Other Members of our Standing Board Committees   

Audit

   $17,500

Compensation

   $7,500

Cybersecurity

   $7,500

Governance and Policy

   $7,500

Finance

   $7,500

*

Cash retainers are paid on a quarterly basis at the end of each quarter in arrears.

Non-employee directors may elect to receive their annual cash retainers for serving as members (but not as chairs)in the form of stock units payable upon termination of the Board committees are: $17,500director’s board service. Non-employee directors who elect to receive their annual cash retainers in the form of stock units and own shares of our common stock having a value at least five times the director’s annual cash retainer may elect to receive for Audit; $7,500 for Compensation; $7,500 for Governance and Policy; and $7,500 for Finance. Cash retainersthe following calendar year either shares of our common stock or stock units that are paidpayable in the fifth calendar

40    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Director Compensation

year after the year in which the stock units are earned (or, if earlier, upon termination of the director’s board service). The common stock or stock units are fully vested on a quarterly basis at the enddate of each quarter in arrears.grant.

Non-employee directors also receive an annual equity award of restricted stock units or shares of our common stock, valued at $130,000.$160,000. On the first trading day of each quarter, eachnon-employee director is granted a number of restricted stock units or shares determined by dividing $32,500$40,000 by the per share closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant, rounded down to the nearest whole unit or share.

Restricted stock unit awards are fully vested at date of grant but do not generally become payable until 30 days following the date anon-employee director ceases to serve on the Board.Non-employee

34    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Director Compensation

directors receive dividend equivalents on their outstanding and unpaid restricted stock units. Dividend equivalents are paid in the form of a credit of additional restricted stock units and are subject to the same vesting, payment and other provisions as the underlying restricted stock units.

If anon-employee director owns shares of our common stock having a value at least five times the director’s annual cash retainer, the director may elect to receive his or her annual equity award in the form of either shares of our common stock or stock units that are payable in the fifth calendar year after the year in which the annual equity award is earned (or, if earlier, upon termination of the director’s board service). The common stock or stock units are fully vested on the date of grant.

20172022 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth the compensation for the year ended December 31, 2017,2022, of ournon-employee directors who served during any part of 2017.2022.

 

Name

  

 

Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash ($)

 

   

Stock
Awards
($)(1)

 

   

All Other
Compensation
($)

 

  

Total ($)

 

 

Fees

Earned or

Paid in

Cash ($)

Stock

Awards

($)(1)

All Other

Compensation

($)(2)

Total ($)

Philip M. Bilden*

  

 

 

 

 

17,187

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

17,187

 

 

 

 

Philip M. Bilden

 (3) 187,159(4)

 

 187,159

Augustus L. Collins

  

 

 

 

 

120,747

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

99,514

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

220,261

 

 

 

 

 

(3)

 284,350(5)

 

 284,350

Kirkland H. Donald**

  

 

 

 

 

110,747

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

99,514

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

210,261

 

 

 

 

Thomas B. Fargo

  

 

 

 

 

350,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

99,514

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

449,514

 

 

 

 

Leo P. Denault

 9,171 

 

 9,171

Kirkland H. Donald

 350,000 159,876

 

 509,876

Victoria D. Harker

  

 

 

 

 

117,714

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

99,514

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

217,228

 

 

 

 

 

127,500

 159,876

 

 287,376

Frank R. Jimenez

 106,693 159,825

 

 266,518

Anastasia D. Kelly

  

 

 

 

 

119,417

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

99,514

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

218,931

 

 

 

 

 115,000 159,876

 

 274,876

Paul D. Miller***

  

 

 

 

 

40,879

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

49,781

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

90,660

 

 

 

 

Tracy B. McKibben

 

115,000

 159,876

 

 274,876

Stephanie L. O’Sullivan

 120,196 159,876

 

 280,072

Thomas C. Schievelbein

  

 

 

 

 

131,120

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

99,514

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

230,634

 

 

 

 

 

137,500

 159,876

 

4,849

 302,225

John K. Welch

  

 

 

 

 

120,747

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

99,514

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

220,261

 

 

 

 

 137,500 159,876

 

 297,376

Stephen R. Wilson

  

 

 

 

 

120,747

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

99,514

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

220,261

 

 

 

 

 132,500 159,876

 

 292,376

 

*Mr. Bilden was elected to the Board on November 7, 2017.
**ADM Donald was elected to the Board effective January 1, 2017.
***ADM Miller retired from the Board effective May 3, 2017.
(1)

The values for stock awards represent the grant date fair values of restricted stock units or shares of common stock granted in 2017,2022, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Information about the assumptions used to value these awards can be found in Note 1918 of the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2022. As of December 31, 2017,2022, ournon-employee directors serving as directors as of December 31, 2017,2022, held the following number of restricted stock units: Bilden—Collins—6,706, Denault—0, Collins—497, Donald—497, Fargo—16,011,4,079, Harker—5,230,7,252, Jimenez—776, Kelly—15,048,16,607, McKibben—2,932, O’Sullivan—1,472, Schievelbein—15,544,19,235, Welch—1,8554,979 and Wilson—1,203;4,858; and the following number of shares of common stock: Bilden—2,200, Fargo—1,781, Harker—493,2,428, Kelly—493,3,838, Schievelbein—4815,847, Welch—1,545 and Welch—1,000.Wilson—460.

 

(2)

Represents value of spousal travel to board- or company-related events.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    35

(3)

Mr. Bilden and Gen. Collins elected to receive their 2022 cash retainers in the form of common stock and stock units, respectively.

(4)

$67,249 of this amount represents common stock issued to Mr. Bilden in lieu of his 2022 cash retainers.

(5)

$124,474 of this amount represents stock units issued to Gen. Collins in lieu of his 2022 cash retainers.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    41



Executive Compensation

 

INTRODUCTION

This section provides information about our executive compensation program with respect to the 20172022 compensation of each of the individuals who served as our Principal Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our three other most highly-compensatedhighly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of 2017 and another individual who was one of our three other most highly-compensated executive officers but was not serving as an executive officer at the end of 2017in 2022 (our “NEOs”). C. Michael Petters served as Chief Executive Officer until March 1, 2022, when his retirement from that position and his appointment as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board became effective. Christopher D. Kastner served as our Chief Operating Officer until March 1, 2022, when his election to Chief Executive Officer became effective. This section includes biographies of our NEOs, the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which explains how and why the Compensation Committee made its compensation decisions for the NEOs, the Report of our Compensation Committee, and the detailed executive compensation tables required by the SEC, with related narrative disclosure.

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER BIOGRAPHIES

The following biographies provide information regarding the experience and education of our NEOs.

C. Michael Petters,Christopher D. Kastner, President and Chief Executive Officer (formerly Chief Operating Officer)

Mr. Petters isKastner, age 59, was elected President and Chief Executive Officer, of HII. He assumed this roleeffective March 1, 2022, after serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer beginning February 2021. As Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Kastner oversaw HII’s three operating segments and worked closely with the segment presidents to drive execution on March 31, 2011, when Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding began operatingHII’s historic backlog. Prior to serving as the newly-formed and publicly-owned Huntington Ingalls Industries following aspin-off from Northrop Grumman Corporation. Mr. Petters is also a member of our Board.

Mr. Petters is responsible for leading the design, construction and overhaul of conventionally-powered surface combatants, amphibious and auxiliary ships and nuclear-powered submarines and aircraft carriers, as well as business opportunities in adjacent markets. From 2008 until he assumed his current position,Chief Operating Officer, he served as president of Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. Prior to that, he served as president of the Newport News sector of Northrop Grumman Corporation.

Mr. Petters joined Newport News Shipbuilding in 1987 in the Los Angeles-class submarine construction division. He subsequently held a number of positions of increasing responsibility throughout the organization, including production supervisor for submarines, marketing manager for submarines and carriers, vice president for aircraft carrier programs, vice president for contracts and pricing, and vice president for human resources.

A native of Florida, Mr. Petters earned a B.S. in Physics from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1982, served aboard the nuclear-powered submarine USS George Bancroft and spent five years in the Naval Reserve. He earned an M.B.A. from the College of William and Mary.

Mr. Petters serves on the board of directors of the U.S. Naval Academy Foundation, the National Bureau of Asian Research and the Virginia Community College Foundation. He serves on the Board of Advisors to the Center for a New American Security and The Executive Committee of the Aerospace Industries Association, and is Chairman of the Virginia Business Council.

Christopher D. Kastner, Executive Vice President Business Management and Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Kastner was elected Executive Vice President, Business Management and Chief Financial Officer effectivefrom March 2016. In thisthat role, he isMr. Kastner was responsible for directing the business strategy and processes in support of business growth and profitability goals. Mr. KastnerHe also hashad responsibility for corporate business management functions, including investor relations, treasury, internal audit, contracts,

36    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

accounting, financial reporting, planning and analysis, rates and budgets and mergers and acquisitions. HeMr. Kastner also providesprovided oversight for segment business management, contracts and estimating and pricing.

From August 2012 until he assumed his current position,became Chief Financial Officer of HII, Mr. Kastner served as Corporate Vice President and General Manager, Corporate Development, responsible for strategy and development activities, including the development and integration of strategic planning efforts, as well as the analysis and entrance into new adjacent markets. Prior to that and from March 2011, he served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of our Ingalls Shipbuilding segment. Before that and from 2008, Mr. Kastner served as Vice President, Business Management and Chief Financial Officer of Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Gulf Coast, and served as Vice President, Contracts and Risk Management of Northrop Grumman Ship Systems from 2006 to 2008. Prior to that, he held several positions at other Northrop Grumman businesses, including Corporate Director of Strategic Transactions.

Mr. Kastner holds a B.A. in Political Science from the University of California at Santa Barbara and an M.B.AM.B.A. from Pepperdine University. He serves on the board of directors of WHRO, the only public broadcasting station in the United States owned by a collaboration of 19 local public school districts, and on the board of trustees for Eastern Virginia Medical School.

Kellye L. Walker,C. Michael Petters, Executive Vice Chairman of the Board (formerly President and Chief Executive Officer)

Mr. Petters, age 63, served as President and Chief Executive Officer of HII from March 2011, when Huntington Ingalls Industries began operating as a stand-alone public company following a spin-off

42    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

from Northrop Grumman Corporation, until March 1, 2022, when he retired as President and CEO. He was appointed Executive Vice Chairman of the Board effective March 1, 2022, and retired from that position effective January 1, 2023.

Thomas E. Stiehle, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Stiehle, age 57, was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective February 2021. In this role, he is responsible for directing HII’s processes in support of business growth and profitability goals. Mr. Stiehle also has responsibility for corporate business management functions, including investor relations, treasury, internal audit, contracts, accounting, financial reporting, planning and analysis, rates and budgets and mergers and acquisitions.

From October 2012 until Mr. Stiehle assumed his current position, he served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of our Ingalls Shipbuilding segment. Prior to that, he served as Vice President, Contracts and Pricing, for Ingalls Shipbuilding. Prior to joining HII in 2011, Mr. Stiehle worked for Northrop Grumman, Aerospace Sector, for 24 years. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Hofstra University, an M.B.A. from Adelphi University and a Master’s Degree in Acquisition and Contract Management from Florida Institute of Technology.

Chad N. Boudreaux, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer

Ms. Walker has served asMr. Boudreaux, age 49, was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer since joining HII in January 2015.effective April 2020. In this position, shehe has overall leadership responsibility for our law department and outside counsel, which provide a broad range of legal advice and support for the company’sour business activities.

activities, including corporate governance matters, compliance, litigation management, and mergers and acquisitions. Prior to joining us, Ms. Walker was with American Water Works Company, Inc., the country’s largest investor-owned waterhis current position, Mr. Boudreaux managed our litigation docket and wastewater utility company, where she servedoversaw our nationally recognized compliance program as Seniorour first chief compliance officer. He joined HII in 2011 as Corporate Vice President General Counselfor Litigation, Investigations and Secretary from January 2010 to January 2015. During her tenureCompliance.

Before joining HII, Mr. Boudreaux practiced law at American Water, she also served as Chief Administrative Officer from September 2010 through May 2014. From February 2007 to June 2009, Ms. Walker served as Senior Vice PresidentBaker Botts LLP, where he established the law firm’s Global Security and General Counsel of Diageo North America, Inc., the largest operating company of Diageo plc. From February 2003 to December 2006, she served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc., a leading warehouse club operator.Corporate Risk Counseling practice group. Prior to that, Ms. Walker served ashe held various high-ranking positions in the U.S. government, including deputy chief of staff of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and leadership positions at the U.S. Department of Justice. Mr. Boudreaux earned a corporate partner in major law firms in Boston, Massachusetts and in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Ms. Walker’s professional affiliations include the American Bar Association, the Association of Corporate Counsel (former board member) and the Executive Leadership Council. She also serves on the Board of Visitors of Christopher Newport University. Ms. Walker received a B.S. in Business Administration, MarketingB.A. from Louisiana TechBaylor University and a J.D. from Emorythe University of Memphis School of Law. He is a recipient of the U.S. Justice Department’s Special Commendation for Outstanding Service for his work on high-stakes litigation for the United States.

Brian J. Cuccias,Kara R. Wilkinson, Executive Vice President and President, Ingalls Shipbuilding

Mr. CucciasMs. Wilkinson, age 48, has served as Executive Vice President and President, of Ingalls Shipbuilding, since April 2014. He is responsible for all programs and operations at Ingalls, including U.S. Navy destroyers, amphibious assault and surface combatant programs, and the U.S. Coast Guard cutter program.1, 2021.

Prior to hisFrom May 2016 until she assumed her current position, and from February 2011, Mr. Cuccias served in several different positions at our Ingalls Shipbuilding segment, including vice president, program management, vice president, amphibious ship programs, and vice president, large deck amphibious ships. From 2008 to February 2011, he was vice president, surface combatants for Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. After joining a

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    37


Executive Compensation

predecessor of Northrop Grumman in 1979, he held a variety of positions, including assistant to the group vice president of Avondale Industries, sector vice president, material, for Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, and DDG(X) and DDG 1000 program manager and vice president.

Mr. Cuccias earned a B.S. in Accounting from the University of South Alabama and has attended executive education programs at Harvard Business School and the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. He is a member of the Executive Committee of the Mississippi Gulf Coast Business Council and serves on the boards of directors of the Mississippi Economic Council (the state’s chamber of commerce), the Jackson County Economic Development Foundation and the Salvation Army of Mobile.

Edgar A. Green III, Executive Vice President and President, Technical Solutions

Mr. Green was appointed Executive Vice President and President, Technical Solutions in December 2016. He is responsible for HII’s services businesses, which include training systems, logistics support, information technology, fleet maintenance and modernization, unmanned undersea systems, nuclear engineering and fabrication, and oil and gas engineering.

Prior to assuming his current position and from January 2015, Mr. Green served as Corporate Vice President, Corporate Development, responsible for all of HII’s corporate development activities related to shipbuilding and marine technical services. From January 2013 to January 2015, he served as Vice President, Component Manufacturing, for Newport News Shipbuilding, where he directed the manufacture of major components used in the construction of U.S. Navy aircraft carriers and submarines. From March 2011 to January 2013, Mr. Green served as Corporate Vice President, Investor Relations, of HII, where he was primarily responsible for the company’s relationships and communications with Wall Street research analysts and shareholders. Prior to joining HII in 2011, Mr. GreenMs. Wilkinson served as Vice President of Investor RelationsProgram Management at Celanese Corp. BeforeIngalls Shipbuilding. Prior to that, he was an investment bankershe held various positions in Business Development and research analystEngineering at Wells Fargo, where he covered the defense and aerospace industry, andIngalls Shipbuilding, after beginning her career at Ingalls Shipbuilding in 1996 as a manufacturing plant engineer and maintenance manager at Eaton Corp.’s Truck Components Division.naval architect.

Mr. Green is a former U.S. Navy nuclear submarine officer. During his naval service, he successfully completed the U.S. Navy’s nuclear power program, including prototype training at the S1C reactor, and served as an officer aboard the ballistic missile submarine USSTecumseh (SSBN 628), qualifying submarines, Poseidon C3 strategic weapons systems officer and S5W engineer. Mr. GreenMs. Wilkinson holds a B.S. in SystemsNaval Architecture and Marine Engineering from the U.S. Naval AcademyUniversity of Michigan and an M.B.A. from DukeTemple University.

Matthew J. Mulherin,Jennifer R. Boykin, Executive Vice President and President, Newport News Shipbuilding (Retired)

Mr. MulherinMs. Boykin, age 58, has served as Executive Vice President and President, of Newport News Shipbuilding, from March 2011 through June  30, 2017, preceding his retirementsince July 2017.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    43


Executive Compensation

From 2012 until she assumed her current position, Ms. Boykin was Vice President, Engineering and Design for Newport News Shipbuilding. Since joining Newport News Shipbuilding in the Nuclear Division in 1987, Ms. Boykin has had a variety of responsibilities, including serving as Vice President of Quality and Process Excellence, Director of Facilities and Waterfront Support, and program manager for the Nuclear Engineering Division. Ms. Boykin also served as a construction superintendent for the aircraft carrier program during construction of USS John C. Stennis and USS Harry S. Truman.

Ms. Boykin holds a B.S. in Marine Engineering from the company.U.S. Merchant Marine Academy and a Master’s Degree in Engineering Management from The George Washington University.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, provides information relevant to understanding the 20172022 compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

Huntington Ingalls IndustriesHII is a global, all-domain defense partner, building and delivering the world’s most powerful, survivable naval ships and technologies that safeguard America’s largest military shipbuilding companyseas, sky, land, space and a provider of professional services to partners in government and industry.cyber. For more than a century, HII’s Newport News and Ingalls shipbuilding segmentsShipbuilding segment in Virginia and Ingalls Shipbuilding segment in Mississippi have built more ships in more ship classes than any other U.S. naval shipbuilder. HII’s Technical SolutionsOur Mission Technologies segment provides a wide range of professional services through its Fleet Support, Integrated Missions Solutions, Nucleardelivers high-value engineering and Environmental,technology solutions to enable multi-domain distributed operations in the government and Oil and Gas groups.commercial markets. Headquartered in Newport News, Virginia, HII employs nearly

38    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

38,000approximately 43,000 people operating both domestically and internationally. The goal of our executive compensation program is to support apay-for-performance culture by implementing compensation programs that are market competitive, customer-focused and fair to our stockholders.

Our 2017 Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”)2022 NEOs are:

 

    Christopher D. KastnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer (formerly Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer)
C. Michael Petters 

Executive Vice Chairman of the Board (formerly President and Chief Executive Officer

Officer)
Christopher D. Kastner    Thomas E. Stiehle 

Executive Vice President Business Management and Chief Financial Officer

Brian J. Cuccias    Chad N. Boudreaux 

Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer

    Kara R. WilkinsonExecutive Vice President and President, Ingalls Shipbuilding

Kellye L. Walker    Jennifer R. Boykin 

Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer

Edgar A. Green III

Executive Vice President and President, Technical Solutions

Matthew J. Mulherin*

Executive Vice President and President, Newport News Shipbuilding (retired)

*Mr. Mulherin served as Executive Vice President and President, Newport News Shipbuilding, until July 1, 2017, preceding his retirement from the company on August 1, 2017.

Executive Summary

Our executive compensation program and practices are described in detail over the following pages. We have designed our executive compensation program to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified executives, incentivize our executives to achieve business objectives, reward performance and align the interests of our executives with the interests of our stockholders and customers. The fundamental philosophy of our executive compensation program, set by the Compensation Committee of the Board, is pay for performance. We have also designed our compensation program to balance performance-based compensation over the short-short-term and long-term to incentivize decisions and actions that promote stockholder value and focus our executives on performance that benefits our stockholders and customers, while discouraging inappropriate risk-taking behaviors.

Thepay-for-performance philosophy of our executive compensation program is demonstrated by the compensation mix of our NEOs. Of the three primary elements of total direct compensation, our executive compensation is heavily weighted toward the variable, performance-based elements, and

44    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

toward the long-term and equity-based elements, as reflected in the following graphs,charts, which set forth the percentage of total compensation corresponding to each compensation element received by our CEO and by our other NEOs collectively in the aggregate in 2017.2022.

 

CEO1

Other NEOs2

 

LOGOLOGO

 

                              Other NEOs2

LOGOLOGO

 

(1)

Reflects the full-year compensation for Mr. Kastner, who served as Chief Operating Officer for the first two months of 2022 and as President and CEO beginning March 1, 2022. Total direct compensation does not include perquisites and other benefits.

(2)Average

Includes the compensation of Mr. Petters, who served as President and CEO for the first two months of 2022 and then as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board for the remainder of 2022. Chart reflects average allocation for the NEOs other than the CEO.Mr. Kastner. Total direct compensation does not include perquisites and other benefits.

100%78% of Mr. Petters’Kastner’s total direct compensation in 20172022 was directly linked to our performance through his annual and long-term incentive awards. Approximately 84%An average of 75% of the total direct compensation of our other NEOs was comprised of performance-based incentive awards.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    39


Executive Compensation

Our underlying philosophy of pay for performance focuses us consistentlyincentivizes our constant focus on achieving our financial and operational goals. Above all, these goals are customer-focused, rewarding safety, quality, cost and schedule performance, and stockholder-friendly, rewarding consistent achievement of strong financial results and increasingcreation of long-term sustainable stockholder value.

20172022 Business Highlights

20172022 was another successfula year for HIIof stable execution in the face of broader operating environment challenges. In 2022 we delivered or re-delivered four critical assets to the U.S. Navy, including the delivery of amphibious transport dock Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28), the delivery of guided-missile destroyer Lenah Sutcliffe Higbee (DDG 123), the re-delivery of Los Angeles-class submarine USS Helena (SSN 725) and our employees asthe delivery of Virginia-class submarine Montana (SSN 794). While we executed on current program milestones, we also were awarded new contracts totaling $9.3 billion in 2022, resulting in backlog of $47.1 billion at year-end, representing many years of future work. At Mission Technologies, the integration of Alion is substantially complete, and the segment achieved significant programmatic wins that would not have been possible without the capabilities added from Alion. 2022 successes were achieved while we aggressively managed through a difficult environment, including a challenging labor market, accelerating inflation and continued to achieve performance objectives consistent with our strategic plan. supply chain pressures.

Our financial accomplishmentsachievements in 2017 included:

$8.1 billion in new contract awards.

$7.4 billion in revenues, a 5.3% increase over the prior year.

$865 million in operating income, compared to $858 million the prior year.

$10.46 diluted earnings per share.

$12.14 adjusted diluted earnings per share*, unchanged from the prior year.

$288 million of common stock repurchases and quarterly cash dividend increase of 20% to $0.72 per share in the fourth quarter.

Credit rating upgraded to investment grade by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch.

Added to Standard & Poor’s 500 index.

*Non-GAAP financial measure.See Annex A for definition and reconciliation to comparable GAAP financial measure.

Our operational accomplishments in 20172022 included:

 

 Delivery of the aircraft carrier USSGerald R. Ford (CVN 78).

$9.3 billion in new contract awards.

 

 Achievement of 50% structural completion on

$10.7 billion in revenues, a 12.1% increase over the aircraft carrierJohn F. Kennedy (CVN 79).prior year.

 

 Completion of first cut of steel on

$14.44 diluted earnings per share, compared to $13.50 diluted earnings per share the aircraft carrierEnterprise (CVN 80).prior year.

 

 Delivery2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    45


Executive Compensation

$52 million of common stock repurchases and quarterly cash dividend increase of 5.1% to $1.24 per share in theVirginia-class submarine USSWashington (SSN 787). fourth quarter.

Our operational achievements in 2022 included:

Delivering amphibious transport dock Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28)

 

 

Launching and christening of theVirginia-class submarineIndiana (SSN 789).Richard M. McCool Jr. (LPD 29)

 

 Redelivery

Authenticating the keel of the aircraft carrier USSAbraham Lincoln (CVN 72).Harrisburg (LPD 30)

 

 Commencement

Christening guided missile destroyer Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125)

Authenticating the keel of Ted Stevens (DDG 128)

Launching and christening National Security Cutter Calhoun (NSC 10)

Christening amphibious transport dock Richard M. McCool Jr. (LPD 29)

Receiving an advanced procurement contract for LPD 32

Receiving a design engineering contract for the next-generation guided-missile destroyer

Authenticating the keel of guided-missile destroyer Jeremiah Denton (DDG 129)

Receiving a contract to begin combat systems availability for the Zumwalt-class destroyer, Lyndon B. Johnson (DDG 1002)

Commencing fabrication of amphibious transport dock Pittsburgh (LPD 31)

Receiving a $2.4 billion contract to build amphibious assault ship Fallujah (LHA 9) and beginning fabrication

Successfully completing builder’s trials for Arleigh Burke-class destroyer Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125)

Commencing fabrication of Arleigh Burke-class destroyer Sam Nunn (DDG 133)

Successfully completing acceptance trials and delivering Arleigh Burke-class destroyer Lenah Sutcliffe Higbee (DDG 123)

Delivering Virginia-class submarine Montana (SSN 794)

Re-delivering USS Helena (SSN 725)

Completing modernization period of USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78)

Reaching five-year labor agreement with United Steelworkers

Launching Virginia-class submarine New Jersey (SSN 796)

Turning over 1,000th compartment of aircraft carrier John F. Kennedy (CVN 79)

Achieving pressure hull complete on Virginia-class submarine Massachusetts (SSN 798)

Celebrating the ceremonial keel laying of aircraft carrier Enterprise (CVN 80)

Authenticating the keel of Virginia-class submarine Arkansas (SSN 800)

46    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

Reaching approximate 98% completion of the refueling and complex overhaul of the aircraft carrier USSGeorge Washington (CVN 73).

 

 Delivery

Reaching approximate 88% completion of the amphibious transport dock USSPortland (LPD 27).John F. Kennedy (CVN 79)

Delivery of the guided missile destroyerRalph Johnson (DDG 114).

Completion of overhaul and modification of the guided missile destroyer USSRamage (DDG 61).

Christening of the National Security CutterKimball (NSC 7).

Keel authentication, launching and christening of the National Security CutterMidgett (NSC 8).

40    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

Christening of the guided missile destroyerPaul Ignatius (DDG 117).

Launching and christening of the guided missile destroyerDelbert D. Black(DDG 119).

Selection to repair the guided missile destroyer USSFitzgerald (DDG 62).

Authentication of keel of the guided missile destroyerFrank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG 121).

Launching and christening of the amphibious assault shipTripoli (LHA 7).

Integration of Technical Solutions segment operations.

Completion of unmanned missions testing of dual-mode undersea vehicle Proteus.

Commencement of management and operating services at the Nevada National Security Site by Technical Solutions joint venture.

Commitment to Compensation Best Practices

We highlight below certain executive compensation practices we have implemented to drive performance, as well as certain practices we have avoided inas not supportive of the belief they would not servelong-term interests of our customers’customers or stockholders’ long-term interests.stockholders.

 

 

 

WHAT WE DO

 

Consideration of Annual
“Say-on-Pay”
Advisory Vote

 

The Compensation Committee considers the results of the annual stockholder“Say-on-Pay” advisory vote on executive compensation.

Pay for Performance

 

Our executive compensation program is heavily weighted toward variable, performance-based elements, and toward long-term and equity-based elements. Variable compensation is tied to the achievement of performance goals and includes annual cash incentive awards and long-term restricted performance stock rights, which are described in detail in this CD&A.

Compensation Risk

Assessment

 

We assess the risk of our compensation programs on an annual basis both internally and with the engagement of the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee agreed with the consultant’s conclusion that there was no undue risk associated with the design or delivery of the programs in 2017.

2022.

Executive Compensation

Recoupment (Clawback)

Policy

 

Our executive compensation recoupment, or clawback, policy allows us to seek reimbursement in certain circumstances of all or a portion of any performance-based short-short-term or long-term cash or equity incentive compensation paid or awarded to executive officers.

Targeted Compensation Benchmarking

 

HII is a unique business with few direct competitors. The Compensation Committee therefore strikes a balance between internal equity and external benchmarking when setting executive pay levels.

Independent Compensation Consultant

 

The Compensation Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to assess the market for the determination of our executive compensation elements and performance targets on an annual and ongoing basis.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    41


Executive Compensation

 

WHAT WE DO

Executive Stock Ownership

Guidelines and Holding

Requirements

 

Our stock ownership guidelines provide that each NEO must own a multiple of his or her annual base salary in our common stock, and we have instituted holding requirements prohibiting our NEOs from selling HII common stock received as compensation until their stock ownership requirements have been met. The holding requirements also require our NEOs to continue to holdone-half of their long-term incentive awards for three additional years after they vest.

 

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    47


Executive Compensation

 

WHAT WE DO

Director Stock Ownership

Guidelines and Holding

Requirements

 

Although our directors do not have specific stock ownership guidelines, the restricted stock units ournon-employee directors receive do not become payable until a director ceases to serve on the Board.Non-employee directors who own shares of our common stock having a value at least five times the amount of their annual cash retainer may elect, on an annual basis, to receive their annual equity award directly in shares of our common stock or stock units that are payable in the fifth calendar year after the year in which the annual equity award is earned (or, if earlier, upon termination of the director’s board service).

In addition, non-employee directors may elect to receive their annual cash retainers in the form of stock units or, in the case of directors who own shares of common stock having a value at least five times the amount of their annual cash retainer, common stock or stock units that are payable in the fifth calendar year after the year in which the annual cash retainer is earned (or, if earlier, upon termination of the director’s board service).

 

 

 

WHAT WE DON’T DO

 

No Employment

Agreements for Executives

 

None of our NEOs have employment agreements, so each NEO is employed by the company “at will.” We maintain a severance plan that provides for the payment of severance benefits in limited termination circumstances.

NoChange-in-Control

Agreements for Executives

 

We have nochange-in-control agreements or related executive taxgross-up benefits. The onlychange-in-control provision in our compensation plans, which applies to all employees who hold equity awards, is the possible acceleration of equity vesting in certain limited circumstances within the parameters of achange-in-control transaction, as defined in the related plans.

No Hedging or Pledging by

Officers or Directors

 

Officers, directors and certain other employees are prohibited from engaging in speculative transactions in our securities, pledging our securities as collateral for a loan or other transaction or engaging in any hedging transactions involving our securities.

No Dividends or Dividend

Equivalents on Unearned
RPSRs


Restricted Performance Stock Rights (RPSRs)

 

No dividends or dividend equivalents are paid out on restricted performance stock rights during the performance period. Dividend equivalent units are paid only at the time and to the extent that the underlying shares vest and are paid.

42    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation Principles

The Compensation Committee of the Board (which we refer to as the “Committee” in this CD&A) is comprised exclusively of independent directors, as determined under NYSE corporate governance listing standards, including the enhanced independence considerationsstandards applicable to members of the Committee. The Committee oversees all of our compensation and benefit programs that affect our NEOs, as well as other officers elected by the Board. The Committee also provides strategic direction for our overall compensation and benefits structure and oversees CEO and senior executive officer succession plans. In conducting oversight of theseour compensation and benefit programs, the Committee is guided by the following compensation principles it has approved.approved by the Committee:

 

Our compensation programs will be primarily customer-focused, rewarding safety, quality, cost and schedule performance, and stockholder friendly, rewarding consistent achievement of strong financial results and increasing stockholder value.

Our compensation programs will be primarily customer-focused, rewarding safety, quality, cost and schedule performance, and stockholder friendly, rewarding consistent achievement of strong financial results and increasing stockholder value.

 

Compensation programs will be designed to influence outcomes and will provide a balance between short- and long-term performances.
48    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Compensation programs will be based on achievement of clear and measurable financial results and accountabilities, with an emphasis on performance-based compensation, and will be formula-based with appropriate levels of discretion for adjustments.

Compensation and benefits will be competitive within the market. Alignment with peer companies will be considered when developing programs and goals, but measures oriented to promoting strong improvements in our own business results will be the predominant factor.

Compensation will be disclosed and explained in a transparent and understandable manner. Clear and concise goals will be established to enable the assessment of performance by the Committee and by stockholders through the CD&A.

Achievement of business goals through both annual operating performance and increased stockholder value will produce significant individual rewards; failure to achieve business goals will negatively affect the pay of our executives.

To promote alignment of management and stockholder interests, elected officers will meet stock ownership guidelines in the following multiples of base salary: CEO and President, seven times; all other elected officers reporting to the CEO, three times. The Committee will monitor attainment of the ownership guidelines on an annual basis. The restricted stock units ournon-employee directors receive do not become payable until a director ceases to serve on the Board.Non-employee directors who own shares of our common stock having a value at least five times the amount of their annual cash retainer may elect, on an annual basis, to receive their annual equity award directly in shares of our common stock or stock units that are payable in the fifth calendar year after the year in which the annual equity award is earned (or, if earlier, upon termination of the director’s board service).

The mix of long-term awards, selection of performance criteria and oversight of compensation programs, together with other features, such as our stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements, will be designed to discourage excessive risk taking by emphasizing a long-term focus on compensation and financial performance.

Our NEO compensation strategy will be consistently applied for all incentive plan participants to promote proper alignment, accountability andline-of-sight regarding commitments and priorities.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    43


Executive Compensation

 

Compensation programs will be designed to influence outcomes and will provide a balance between short- and long-term performances.

Compensation programs will be based on achievement of clear and measurable financial results and accountabilities, with an emphasis on performance-based compensation, and will be formula-based with appropriate levels of discretion for adjustments.

Compensation and benefits will be competitive within the market. Alignment with peer companies will be considered when developing programs and goals, but measures oriented to promoting strong improvements in our own business results will be the predominant factor.

Compensation will be disclosed and explained in a transparent and understandable manner. Clear and concise goals will be established to enable the assessment of performance by the Committee and by stockholders through the CD&A.

Achievement of business goals through both annual operating performance and increased stockholder value will produce significant individual rewards; failure to achieve business goals will negatively affect the pay of our executives.

To promote alignment of management and stockholder interests, elected officers will meet stock ownership guidelines in the following multiples of base salary: CEO and President, seven times; all other elected officers reporting to the CEO, three times. The Committee will monitor attainment of the ownership guidelines on an annual basis. The restricted stock units our non-employee directors receive do not become payable until a director ceases to serve on the Board. Non-employee directors who own shares of our common stock having a value at least five times the amount of their annual cash retainer may elect, on an annual basis, to receive their annual equity award directly in shares of our common stock or stock units that are payable in the fifth calendar year after the year in which the annual equity award is earned (or, if earlier, upon termination of the director’s board service). In addition, non-employee directors may elect to receive their annual cash retainers in the form of stock units or, in the case of directors who own shares of common stock having a value at least five times the amount of their annual cash retainer, common stock or stock units that are payable in the fifth calendar year after the year in which the annual cash retainer is earned (or, if earlier, upon termination of the director’s board service).

The mix of long-term awards, selection of performance criteria and oversight of compensation programs, together with other features, such as our stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements, will be designed to discourage excessive risk taking by emphasizing a long-term focus on compensation and financial performance.

Our NEO compensation strategy will be consistently applied for all incentive plan participants to promote proper alignment, accountability and line-of-sight regarding commitments and priorities.

Pay for Performance

The fundamental philosophy of our executive compensation program is pay for performance. Ourpay-for-performance philosophy and compensation principles are designed to attract, motivate and retain highly-qualified executives, incentivize our executives to achieve business objectives, reward performance and align the interests of our executives with the interests of our stockholders and customers. As such, we provide significant reward opportunities to our NEOs linked to achievement of our financial and operational goals. Above all, these goals are customer-focused, rewarding achievement of safety, quality, cost and schedule goals, and stockholder-friendly, rewarding consistent achievement of strong financial results and building or increasing stockholder value. Performance-based compensation is balanced over the short-short-term and long-term to incentivize decisions and actions that promote stockholder value and focus our executives on performance that benefits our stockholders and customers, while discouraging inappropriate risk taking behaviors.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    49


Executive Compensation

This focus on performance is demonstrated in the compensation mix of our NEOs. Our executive compensation is heavily weighted toward the variable, performance-based elements, and toward the long-term and equity-based elements, as reflected in the following charts, which set forth the percentage of total target compensation corresponding to each compensation element for each of our CEO and for our other NEOs who was employedcollectively for all of 2017.2022.

 

CEO Target Compensation Mix1

Other NEOs Target Compensation Mix2

LOGOLOGO

 

LOGO
(1)

Reflects the full-year compensation for Mr. Kastner, who served as Chief Operating Officer for the first two months of 2022 and as President and CEO beginning March 1, 2022. Total target compensation does not include perquisites and other benefits.

(2)

Includes the compensation of Mr. Petters, who served as President and CEO for the first two months of 2022 and then as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board for the remainder of 2022. Chart reflects average allocation for the NEOs other than Mr. Kastner. Total target compensation does not include perquisites and other benefits.

The design of our incentive compensation plans also supports ourpay-for-performance philosophy. A significant portion of the potential compensation of our executives is at risk, and that risk increasescorresponds with each executive’s level of responsibility. Exceeding our financial and operational targets can result in a payout of up to 200% of the original award target, while failure to meet our targets can result in no payouts of incentive compensation to NEOspayouts under our plans.

20172022 “Say-on-Pay” Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Consistent with our goal of supporting apay-for-performance philosophy by implementing compensation programs that reward performance, are market competitive and align the interests of our executives with the interests of our stockholders and customers, we seek the views of our stockholders annually on the design, effectiveness and results of our executive compensation program.

At our 20172022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders approved our executive compensation on an advisory basis with 98%97% of the votes cast.cast (excluding non-broker votes). This strong support, among other factors, resulted in the Committee not making significant changes tocontinuing our executive compensation program.program without significant changes.

Retention of Independent Compensation Consultant

The Committee continued in 20172022 to engage an independent compensation consultant, Exequity, LLP (“Exequity”), to assist the Committee in carrying out its responsibilities under its charter. Under the

44    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

Target Total Compensation Mix


Executive Compensation

terms of the agreement between the Committee and the consultant, the Committee has the exclusive right to select, retain and terminate Exequity, as well as to approve any fees, terms or other conditions of Exequity’s service. Exequity reports directly to the Committee. When directed to do so by the Committee, the consultant also works collaboratively with company management to develop analyses and proposals for presentations to the Committee. The Committee reviews the performance of the independent consultant on an annual basis and determines whether to continue the engagement.

50    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

Exequity attended several Committee meetings during 20172022 and presented analyses and key recommendations for Committee consideration, discussed emerging trends and technical issues and reviewed and commented on management proposals, as appropriate. In addition, the consultant responded to miscellaneous Committee requests.

Compensation Consultant Independence Assessment

In accordance with SEC rules and NYSE listing standards, the Committee requested and received information from Exequity relating to the consultant’s independence and potential conflicts of interest, including information regarding the following: (1) other services provided to us by the consultant; (2) fees paid by us as a percentage of the consulting firm’s total revenue; (3) policies or procedures maintained by the consulting firm designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and a member of the Committee; (5) any company stock owned by the individual consultants involved in the engagement; and (6) any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and the consulting firm or the individual consultants involved in the engagement.

Based upon an assessment of these factors, including information gathered from our directors and executive officers relating to business or personal relationships with the consulting firm or the individual consultants, the Committee concluded that the consultant is independent and that the work of the consultant did not raise any conflict of interest.

Peer Group Development

The Committee believes our total compensation program (base salary, target annual cash incentive awards, target long-term incentive awards and benefits) should provide aggregate compensation at approximately the 50th percentile of the relevant market. Based upon an analysis conducted by Exequity and reviewed with the Committee, the Committee determined that our NEO base pay generally falls at or belowapproximates the median and long-term incentive compensation is generally in the third or fourth quartile among the peer companies. This compensation mix is consistent with both management’s and the Committee’s philosophy that a significant portion of an executive’s overall compensation package should be based on the performance of the company and therefore at risk.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    45


Executive Compensation

HII is a unique business with few directly comparable peer companies. As such, our current peer group is comprised of heavy manufacturing, engineering and defense companies withthat have annual revenues generally between $1$5 billion and $10$20 billion and that most closely match our company in terms of market cap, strategic interest, workforce similarities and/or business type. The median annual revenues for peer group companies was $5.8$6.2 billion, compared to our 20172022 revenues of $7.4$10.7 billion. The targeted peer group for our 20172022 NEO compensation analysis consisted of the following 1614 companies:

 

 BWX Enterprises, Inc. Orbital ATKNRG Energy, Inc. 
 Chicago Bridge & Iron CompanyCurtiss-Wright Corporation Oshkosh Corporation 
 Howmet Aerospace Inc. Parker Hannifin Corporation 
 Federal-Mogul CorporationRockwell Collins,Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Harris Corporation Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. 
 KBR Inc. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated 
 L-3 Harris Technologies, Inc. Textron Inc. 
 Moog Inc. TransDigm Group 

The Committee analyzed the business landscape in the markets in which HII operates and has decided to modify this peer group for 2023 by adding Leidos Holdings, Inc. and Dover Corporation and removing NRG Energy, Inc.

  2023 Notice and Proxy Statement     
NRG Energy, Inc.Triumph Group, Inc.51

Federal-Mogul was acquired by Icahn Enterprises Holdings in 2017. We expect all other peer companies to remain the same for 2018.


Executive Compensation

Compensation Risk Assessment

The Board actively oversees our overall risk profile, including the potential risk posed by our compensation programs. During the third quarter of 2017,2022, a risk assessment and analysis of our executive compensation programs was conducted by Exequity. Their findings confirmed that our executive compensation programs are designed to drive apay-for-performance philosophy and do not create risks that are likely to have a material adverse impact on the company. The Committee reviewedevaluated and discussed the risk analysis with Exequity and agreed with the consultant’s conclusions.

The following factors are key components of our executive compensation risk mitigation efforts:

 

Our stock ownership guidelines and additional stock holding requirement of three years from the date of payout, including any payout that occurs within one year of retirement, provide a strong risk mitigation tool;

Our stock ownership guidelines and additional stock holding requirement of three years from the date of payout, including any payout that occurs within one year of retirement, provide a strong risk mitigation tool;

 

Our clawback policy applies to all employees at the level of vice president and above, allowing us to recoup incentive payments in the event of restated financial results;

Our clawback policy applies to all employees at the level of vice president and above, allowing us to recoup incentive payments in the event of restated financial results;

 

Our lack of employment agreements discourages management entrenchment and increases our flexibility to make management changes when appropriate;

Our lack of employment agreements discourages management entrenchment and increases our flexibility to make management changes when appropriate;

 

Long-term incentive compensation payouts are capped at 200%, preventing possible windfall awards resulting from unforeseen circumstances; and

Our long-term incentive compensation plan includes a relative performance component, alleviating risk and inherent forecasting uncertainty of relying solely on budget-based goals;

 

Long-term incentive compensation awards are earned over a three-year performance period and reduce any incentive to engage in business tactics that improve short-term performance at the expense of long-term success.

Long-term incentive compensation payouts are capped at 200%, preventing possible windfall awards resulting from unforeseen circumstances; and

2017

Long-term incentive compensation awards are earned over a three-year performance period and reduce any incentive to engage in business tactics that improve short-term performance at the expense of long-term success.

2022 Compensation Elements

The direct compensation elements for executives under our compensation program consist primarily of base salaries, annual incentive awards and long-term incentive awards. Annual base salary provides a fixed minimum level of compensation that is competitive within the relevant market and helps us attract and retain highly qualified executives. Annual incentive awards are generally paid in cash and intended

46    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

to motivate executives to achievepre-determined annual financial and operational goals that are aligned with our strategic goals. Long-term incentive awards are generally equity-based and intended to promote achievement ofpre-determined three-year financial performance goals aligned with long-term stockholder interests.

20172022 Key Compensation Decisions

Key compensation decisions for our NEOs for 20172022 included the following:

 

Base salaries for Messrs. Cuccias and Kastner and Ms. Walker were increased as a result of market adjustments or merit adjustments.

Performance-based merit increases were provided for all NEOs for 2022, with the exception of Mr. Petters. The base salaries for Messrs. Stiehle and Boudreaux and Ms. Wilkinson were also increased as a result of market adjustments.

 

Targets as a percentage of base salary for annual incentive awards under our AIP were not increased in 2017. Based on our performance for 2017, as well as the individual performances of our NEOs, payout awards were approved at levels that ranged from 100% to 184% of targets.

Upon Mr. Kastner’s election as President and Chief Executive Officer, his base salary was increased from $721,000 to $1,100,000 and his AIP target as a percentage of salary was increased from 90% to 125%. As a result, his AIP target value was prorated for 2022 based on the amount of time he served as Chief Operating Officer and as President and CEO during the year. In addition, his LTIP

 

Targets as a percentage of base salary for long-term incentive awards were not increased in 2017. All long-term incentive awards were in the form of restricted performance stock rights, which vest only upon achievement of performance metrics consisting of pension adjusted return on invested capital (“ROIC”) and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and pension (“EBITDAP”) over the performance period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019.
52    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

ROIC is a measure of our ability to use cash flows to generate returns. ROIC is calculated as Adjusted Free Cash Flow divided by Invested Capital. Adjusted Free Cash Flow represents cash flow available to HII’s equity and debt stakeholders, calculated as Free Cash Flow (cash from operations less capital expenditures net of related grant proceeds) plusafter-tax interest. Invested Capital is equal to total debt, plus equity, less goodwill and the impact of any Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/Loss.

EBITDAP is a key indicator of our financial performance. EBITDAP is calculated as Net Earnings, plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, less Net Pension/Post Retirement Benefit Expense.

Base Salaries

The base salaries of Messrs. Cuccias and Kastner and Ms. Walker increased in 2017, and the base salaries for our other NEOs were unchanged, effectively maintaining market competitiveness. Increases for Messrs. Cuccias and Kastner were based on management’s recommendation and an analysis of market and peer company data conducted by our independent compensation consultant. The increase for Ms. Walker was based on individual performance in the form of a merit increase.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    47


Executive Compensation

 

target value was increased from $2,000,000 to $4,400,000. The decision to increase these components of compensation was based on a market analysis for the position provided by Exequity and management recommendations.

Upon Mr. Petters’ retirement as President and Chief Executive Officer and his appointment as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board, his base salary was increased from $1 to $770,000 as a result of his decision to receive a market salary rather than a $1 annual base salary he elected to receive as President and CEO, and his LTIP target value was decreased from $4,400,000 to $1,452,000. His AIP target as a percentage of salary remained the same at 125%. As a result of Mr. Petters’ base salary increase, his AIP target value was prorated for 2022 based on the amount of time he served as President and CEO and as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board during the year. The decision to adjust these components of compensation was based on a market analysis for the position provided by Exequity and management recommendations.

Targets as a percentage of base salary for annual incentive awards for 2022 under our AIP were increased from 2021 for all NEOs with the exception of Mr. Petters. Based on our performance for 2022, as well as the individual performances of our NEOs, payout awards were approved at levels that ranged from 112% to 155% of targets.

Targets for long-term incentive awards for 2022 were increased from 2021 for Messrs. Kastner, Stiehle and Boudreaux. The target for Mr. Petters was decreased as a result of his retirement from the position of President and CEO. All long-term incentive awards were in the form of restricted performance stock rights, which vest only upon achievement of performance metrics.

Base Salaries

Base salaries for our NEOs for 20172022 were as follows:

 

Name

Name

Title  

 

Title2022 Annual
Salary

2017 Annual

Salary

($)

 

C. Michael Petters*Christopher D. Kastner*

 

  

 

President and Chief Executive Officer (formerly Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,100,000  

 

 

 

 

Christopher D. KastnerC. Michael Petters**

 

  

 

Executive Vice Chairman of the Board (formerly President Business Management and Chief Financial OfficerExecutive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

525,000770,000  

 

Thomas E. Stiehle

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

575,000  

 

Brian J. CucciasChad N. Boudreaux

Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer

570,000  

Kara R. Wilkinson

 

  

 

Executive Vice President and President, Ingalls Shipbuilding

 

  

550,000

Kellye L. Walker

Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer

 

 

 

 

 

527,875515,000  

 

 

 

 

Edgar A. Green III

Executive Vice President and President, Technical Solutions

400,000

Matthew J. Mulherin, retiredJennifer R. Boykin

 

  

 

Executive Vice President and President, Newport News Shipbuilding

 

  

 

 

 

 

515,000551,565  

 

 

 

 

*At

Upon Mr. Kastner’s election as President and CEO, his request, base salary was increased from $721,000 to $1,100,000.

**

Mr. Petters receives ancontinued to receive a $1 annual base salary for the first two months of $1. His primary compensation comes2022, when he served as President and CEO, which was increased to $770,000 on a prorated basis for the remainder of the year upon his retirement from performance-based equity compensation,the President and CEO position and appointment as a significant stockholder, his personal wealth is tied directly to sustained performance and HII stock price appreciation, which directly aligns with stockholder interests. Mr. Petters will continue to receive equity andnon-equity performance-based compensation reflected as a percentageExecutive Vice Chairman of his 2015 base salary. The Committee will continue to review compensation opportunities for Mr. Petters on an ongoing basis and recommend changes, if needed, to maintain alignment with business objectives.the Board.

Creation of Annual Incentive Plan (AIP)(“AIP”) and Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan (LTIP)(“LTIP”) Goals

The Committee approved financial metric goals under our AIP for the corporate office, as well as a combination of financial and operational metric goals for each of our three operating divisions. The guiding principle behind all of our performance metrics is that they drive the desired outcomes to promote customer satisfaction and increase stockholder value.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    53


Executive Compensation

Division operational goals based on clear and measurable results were developed collaboratively between division management and corporate management. OperationalShipbuilding division operational goals fall into the categories of safety, quality, cost, schedule, diversity and schedule, with a fifth category oriented to goals focused oninclusion, division-specific challenges and opportunities which may change from year to year.and cross-shipbuilding collaboration. Mission Technologies division operational goals fall into the categories of diversity and inclusion, cross business synergy, Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”) compliant integration, the integration of Alion and division-specific challenges.

The Committee approved financial goals for the LTIP to reward performance in three-year increments. The performance metrics for all participants under the LTIP for 20172022 were pension adjusted return on invested capital (“ROIC”), earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and pension (“EBITDAP”) and relative EBITDAP growth over the performance period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024.

ROIC is a measure of our ability to use cash flows to generate returns. ROIC is calculated as Adjusted Free Cash Flow divided by average Invested Capital. Adjusted Free Cash Flow represents cash flow available to HII’s equity and EBITDAP.debt stakeholders, calculated as Free Cash Flow (cash from operations less capital expenditures net of related grant proceeds) plus after-tax interest. Average Invested Capital is equal to total debt, plus equity, less goodwill and the impact of any Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/Loss.

EBITDAP is a key indicator of our financial performance and calculated as Net Earnings, plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, less Net Pension/Post Retirement Benefit Expense.

Relative EBITDAP growth is defined as our EBITDAP ending balance less our EBITDAP beginning balance, divided by the EBITDAP beginning balance, measured against EBITDAP growth of the S&P Aerospace and Defense Select Index (SPSIAD), which consists of more than 30 companies.

Annual Incentive Compensation Awards

The Committee approves annual incentive compensation targets as a percentage of base salary for each NEO position. Targets vary with relevant benchmark market levels, individual job level, job scope and overall influence on our business results. The Committee considers both the recommendations of its compensation consultant and those of management in determining appropriate annual incentive target levelstargets for our NEOs. The target incentive award (“Target Bonus”) is based on a percentage of each NEO’s base salary and provides a basis upon which a final award amount is determined by the Committee based upon its assessment of performance againstpre-determined performance criteria after the year has ended. The annual incentive compensation targets for our NEOs expressed as a percentage of base salary tend to fall into the third quartile of the relevant market data.

20172022 Annual Incentive Plan

Annual incentive awards for Mr.Messrs. Petters, Mr.Stiehle, Kastner and Ms. WalkerBoudreaux for 20172022 were evaluated based upon Operating Margin (“OM”) and FreeOperating Cash Flow (“FCF”OCF”) for the entire enterprise and revenue for

48    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

the Technical Solutions division to arrive at a company performance factor (“CPF”), as well as an individual performance factor (“IPF”). OM is equal to segment operating income as a percentage of total revenues. Segment operating income is equal to operating income before the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment andnon-current state income taxes. FCFOCF represents cash from operating activities lessbefore discretionary pension contributions, capital expenditures net of related grant proceeds.and excess cash flow.

54    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

Achievement of the maximum performance criteria results in a CPF factor of 2.0. If the CPF for the corporate office is less than 0.5, no annual incentive award is paid. The IPF can range from 0 to 1.5. No annual incentive award can exceed 200% of an individual’s Target Bonus. The annual incentive award formula for the corporate office for the 20172022 performance period was:

Base Salary x Target % = Target Bonus

Target Bonus x CPF x IPF = Final Bonus Award

2017Upon Mr. Kastner’s election as President and Chief Executive Officer, his base salary was increased from $721,000 to $1,100,000 and his AIP target as a percentage of salary was increased from 90% to 125%. As a result, his AIP target value was prorated for 2022 based on the amount of time he served as Chief Operating Officer and as President and CEO during the year.

Upon Mr. Petters’ retirement as President and Chief Executive Officer and his appointment as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board, his base salary was increased from $1 to $770,000. His AIP target as a percentage of salary remained the same at 125%. As President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Petters’ base salary used for incentive compensation purposes was $1,100,000. As a result of his base salary increase, his AIP target value was prorated for 2022 based on the amount of time he served as President and CEO and as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board during the year.

The 2022 annual incentive awards for Messrs. CucciasMs. Wilkinson and MulherinMs. Boykin were evaluated based on their respective division performance factors (“DPF”), which include division financial metric goals, consisting of OM and FCF for their respective divisions,OCF, and their respective divisionnon-financial goals, which include safety, quality, cost, schedule, diversity and schedule,inclusion, division management and cross-shipbuilding collaboration, as well as theiran individual IPFs. The 2017 annual incentive award for Mr. Green was evaluated based on the Technical Solutions DPF of OM, FCF and revenue, as well as his individual IPF.

Achievement of the maximum division performance criteria results in a factorDPF of 2.0. No2.0, and no annual incentive award is paid to division AIP participants if the CPF with reference to the corporate metrics is less than 0.5. The IPF can range from 0 to 1.5. No annual incentive award can exceed 200% of an individual’s Target Bonus. The annual incentive award formula for the operating divisions for the 20172022 performance period was:

Base Salary x Target % = Target Bonus

Target Bonus x DPF x IPF = Final Bonus Award

At the conclusion of each calendar year, our CEO conducts an annual performance evaluation for each NEO in order to recommendas a basis for recommending an IPF for each NEO. These evaluations are reviewed with the Committee. Each NEO’s individual performance is evaluated based upon consideration of the following factors:

 

Financial performance of our company as a whole and the division(s) (where applicable);

Financial performance of our company as a whole and the division(s) (where applicable);

 

Performance onnon-financial goals, including company-level goals and division-specific operating goals;

Performance on non-financial goals, including enterprise-wide goals and division-specific operating goals;

 

Strategic leadership and vision;

Strategic leadership and vision;

 

Program execution and performance;

Program execution and performance;

 

Customer relationships; and

Customer relationships; and

 

Peer and employee relationships/engagement.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    55


Peer and employee relationships/engagement.

Executive Compensation

The Committee reviews and considers the recommendations from the CEO and all performance information, including a comparison to the 20172022 peer group data. The Committee then approves annual incentive compensation awards for all NEOs, subject to ratification by the independent members of the Board with respect to the CEO’s compensation.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    49


Executive Compensation

Target Bonus Amounts

Based on analyses of relevant market benchmarks and peer group data, we did not increaseadjustments were made to annual incentive compensation targets as a percentage of base salary for our NEOs from 2016 to 2017.salary. The 20172022 Target Bonus amounts were as follows:

 

 

Name

 

  

 

Incentive Target as %
of Base Salary (%)

 

  

 

2017 Target Bonus  
($)  

 

 

C. Michael Petters (1)

 

   

 

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

1,187,500

 

 

 

 

Christopher D. Kastner

 

   

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

367,500

 

 

 

 

Brian J. Cuccias

 

   

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

385,000

 

 

 

 

Kellye L. Walker

 

   

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

369,513

 

 

 

 

Edgar A. Green III

 

   

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

280,000

 

 

 

 

Matthew J. Mulherin, retired (2)

 

   

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

385,000

 

 

 

Name

  

Incentive Target as %

of Base Salary (%)

  

2022 Target Bonus    

($)

 

Christopher D. Kastner (1)

 

  

 

125

 

  

 

1,375,000

 

 

C. Michael Petters (2)

 

  

 

125

 

  

 

    962,500

 

 

Thomas E. Stiehle (3)

 

  

 

  80

 

  

 

    460,000

 

 

Chad N. Boudreaux (3)

 

  

 

  80

 

  

 

    456,000

 

 

Kara R. Wilkinson (3)

 

  

 

  80

 

  

 

    412,000

 

 

Jennifer R. Boykin (3)

 

  

 

  80

 

  

 

    441,252

 

(1)At his request,

Mr. Petters receives an annual base salary of $1, but his performance-based compensation is computedKastner’s incentive target as a percentage of his 2015 base salary ($950,000).was increased from 90% to 125% upon his election as President and CEO. For 2022, his actual AIP target was prorated based on the amount of time he served as Chief Operating Officer and as President and CEO and his AIP targets in those positions, as described above under “2022 Key Compensation Decisions.”

(2)Although

Mr. Mulherin’sPetters’ incentive target as a percentage of base salary for 2017 remained the same at $515,000 until125% upon his election as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board. Prior to his retirement we used $550,000,as President and CEO, the amount of Mr. Cuccias’ base salary used for incentive compensation purposes to ensure equitable compensation betweenwas $1,100,000. For 2022, his actual AIP target was prorated based on the division presidents based uponamount of time he served as President and CEO and as Executive Vice Chairman of the respective division performance achievements.Board and his AIP targets in those positions, as described above under “2022 Key Compensation Decisions.”

Plan Funding

(3)

AIP targets for Messrs. Stiehle and Boudreaux and Mses. Wilkinson and Boykin were increased from 75% of base salary to 80% of base salary.

56    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

Our AIP was designed to comply with the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”). Effective January 1, 2018, the performance-based compensation exception to the $1 million deduction limitation of 162(m) was repealed as a result of enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) on December 22, 2017. Because our 2017 AIP awards paid out in 2018 and were not grandfathered under the Tax Act, the performance-based compensation exception does not apply to the awards.

Prior to repeal of the performance-based compensation exception under IRC Section 162(m), the Committee established performance-based parameters for the payment of annual incentive compensation awards with approval of a bonus pool that appropriates an amount (“Tentative Appropriated Incentive Compensation”) not to exceed 2.5% of our Economic Earnings for the performance year. “Economic Earnings” is defined as income from continuing operations before federal and foreign income taxes and the cumulative effect of accounting changes and extraordinary items,less pension income (or plus pension expense)plus amortization and impairment of goodwill and other purchased intangible assetsplus restructuring or similar charges to the extent they are separately disclosed in the annual report. Our performance-based compensation policy provides that the maximum potential individual incentive compensation award for a performance year for an officer subject to IRC Section 162(m) will be limited to no more than 40% of the Tentative Appropriated Incentive Compensation for the CEO and 20% for each of the other covered NEOs other than our CFO.

20172022 Annual Incentive Plan Goals and Results

For Mr.Messrs. Kastner, Petters, Mr. KastnerStiehle and Ms. Walker, 2017Boudreaux, 2022 annual incentive compensation awards were based 80%entirely upon overall company performanceenterprise performance. For Ms. Wilkinson and 20% upon the performance of Technical Solutions. For Messrs. Cuccias, Green and Mulherin, 2017Ms. Boykin, 2022 annual incentive compensation awards were based upon the performance of the Ingalls division, the Technical SolutionsShipbuilding division and the Newport News Shipbuilding division, respectively.

The corporate AIP score iswas based 80%entirely upon our overall financial score, and 20% upon Technical Solutions revenue, as described below.

50    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

The respective Ingalls Shipbuilding division and the Newport News Shipbuilding division performance scores arewere based 50% on the respective division operational score and 50%scores, 40% on the respective division financial score.scores and 10% on the combined operating margins (“SOM”) of the two shipbuilding divisions. In determining the division performance factors for the AIP awards for Messrs. Cucciasthe two shipbuilding divisions, the performance criteria were weighted as follows:

   Metric Description Individual
Weight
 Overall
Weight
    

OPERATIONAL*

 Safety 

Measured by a combination of elements, including total case rate, lost total case rate and

lost work days rate

 16% 

50%

 Quality Measured by integrating elements such as defect rates, process quality, planning quality and other appropriate criteria for program type and phase 14%
 Cost 

Measured using program-specific objectives related to achievement of cost factors that include

Cost Performance Index and overhead rates

 14%
 Schedule Measured using program-specific objectives related to achievement of quarterly schedule targets 14%
 Cross-Shipbuilding Collaboration 

Measured based on five areas (program management, supply chain management,

planning, engineering and operations)

 14%
 Diversity and Inclusion Measured using a combination of the following elements: hiring, promotional and developmental opportunities and placements for diverse candidates 14%
 Division Management 

Focused on operational or financial goals or goals relating to environmental, human capital or

any other area in which our CEO desires to drive performance. Goals recommended by our CEO and approved by the Committee at the beginning of the performance year are specific to each division’s opportunities and challenges

 14%

FINANCIAL

 Return on Sales 

Measured as division OM before other post- employment retirement benefits and FAS/CAS

net pension expense

 50% 40%
 Operating Cash Flow 

Measured as division OCF before discretionary pension contributions, capital expenditures and

excess cash flow

 50%

OPERATING MARGIN

 Combined Shipbuilding Operating Margin Measured as the combined OM of the shipbuilding divisions 100% 10%

*

The operational criteria, which are specific to the respective divisions, were recommended by our CEO and approved by the Committee at the beginning of the performance year.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    57


Executive Compensation

The Mission Technologies division performance score was based 40% on the division operational score and Mulherin,60% on the performancedivision financial score. Performance criteria are weighted as follows:

 

50% based on achievement of the respective division operational criteria.
   Metric Description Individual
Weight
 Overall
Weight
    

OPERATIONAL*

 Growth/Division Specific Focused on operational or financial goals or goals relating to winning contracts or any other area in which our CEO desires to drive performance. Goals are recommended by our CEO and approved by the Committee at the beginning of the performance year and are specific to the division’s opportunities and challenges 38% 40%
 Alion Integration Measured by a successful integration in the following areas: capability of payroll, HRIS, benefits, travel and cost 15%
 Diversity and Inclusion Measured using program-specific objectives related to the creation of development plans and placements for diverse candidates 15%
 Cross Business Synergy Measured using program-specific objectives related to winning new synergy business pursuits 8%
 SOX Compliant Integration Measured based on the integration of Alion into SOX compliant policies 25%

FINANCIAL

 Revenue Measured as division total sales 33% 60%
 EBITDA Measured as division operating income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization 33%
 Operating Cash Flow Measured as division OCF before capital expenditures 34%

*The division operational criteria consist of the following five performance metrics, which are weighted equally (i.e., eachsub-metric comprises 20% of the division operational criteria). These criteria, which are specific to the respective divisions, arewere recommended by our CEO and approved by the Committee at the beginning of the performance year.

Safety—Measured by a combination of elements, including total case rate, lost total case rate and lost work days rate;

Quality—Measured by integrating elements such as defect rates, process quality, planning quality and other appropriate criteria for program type and phase;

Schedule—Measured using program-specific objectives related to achievement of quarterly schedule targets;

Cost—Measured using program-specific objectives related to achievement of cost factors that include Cost Performance Index and overhead rates; and

Division Management—May be focused on operational or financial goals or goals focused on environmental, human capital or any other area in which our CEO desires to drive performance. Goals recommended by our CEO and approved by the Committee at the beginning of the performance year are specific to each division’s opportunities and challenges.

25% based on achievement of the respective division return on sales (“ROS”) performance criteria

ROS performance criteria—Measured as division OM before other post-employment benefits and FAS/CAS net pension expense.

25% based on achievement of the respective division FCF performance criteria

FCF performance criteria—Measured as division FCF before discretionary pension contributions and excess cash flow.

The Technical Solutions division performance score is based 100% on the division financial score. In determining the division performance factors for the AIP award for Mr. Green, the performance criteria are weighted as follows:

30% based on achievement of the division revenue performance criteria

35% based on achievement of the division OM performance criteria

OM performance criteria—Measured as division OM before other post-employment benefits and FAS/CAS net pension expense.

35% based on achievement of the division FCF performance criteria

FCF performance criteria—Measured as division FCF before discretionary pension contributions and excess cash flow.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    51


Executive Compensation

All of the AIP goals for our NEOs are recommended by our CEO and then approved by the Committee.

AIP goals are plan-based, with minimum and maximum limits based on clear targets connected to our strategic goals.annual operating plan. The AIP goals are based upon metrics that are customer focused and stockholder friendly with clearline-of-sight financial and operational metrics. Final AIP performance metrics for 2017,2022, as determined by the Committee, were as follows:

Corporate 20172022 Metrics for Mr.Messrs. Kastner, Petters, Mr. KastnerStiehle and Ms. WalkerBoudreaux

 

 

Corporate 2017 Metrics

 

 

 

Goals @
0%

 

  

 

Goals @
100%

 

  

 

Goals @
200%

 

  

 

Actual

 

  

 

Points

 

  

 

Weighting

 

  

 

Final AIP
Points

 

 

 

OM—Performance (%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.69  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.13  

 

 

 

 

  

 

8.66 

 

 

 

  

 

901 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80  

 

 

 

 

 

FCF—Performance ($M)

 

 

 

 

 

 

491  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

548  

 

 

 

 

  

 

618 

 

 

 

  

 

636 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80  

 

 

 

 

 

TS Revenue ($M)

 

 

 

 

 

 

892  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

992  

 

 

 

 

  

 

1,091 

 

 

 

  

 

952 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12  

 

 

 

 

 

Total Performance (CPF)

 

             

 

 

 

 

Total AIP Score

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

172  

 

 

 

 

Ingalls Shipbuilding 2017 Metrics for Mr. Cuccias

Corporate 2022 Metrics

 

Goals @

0%

 

Goals @

100%

 

Goals @

200%

 Performance
Results
 Points
Earned
 Weighting 

Final AIP   

Points   

OM—Performance (%)

  

 

5.69  

  

 

6.71  

  

 

7.22  

  

 

  6.68

  

 

98  

  

 

50%  

 

  

 

49  

OCF—Performance ($M)

  

 

721  

  

 

860  

  

 

922  

  

 

  938

  

 

200  

  

 

50%  

 

  

 

100  

Total Performance (CPF)

                      

 

Total AIP Score

  

 

149  

 

 

Ingalls 2017 Metrics

 

 

 

Goals @
0%

 

  

 

Goals @
100%

 

  

 

Goals @
200%

 

  

 

Actual

 

  

 

Points

 

  

 

Weighting

 

  

 

Final AIP
Points

 

 

 

Operational Metrics

 

       

 

Operational Performance (Safety, Quality, Cost, Schedule, Site President Specific)

 

 

 

 

 

 

0  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

167  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

167  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

84    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Financial Metrics

 

       

 

OM—Performance (%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.20  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.20  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.60  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50    

 

 

 

 

 

FCF—Performance ($M)

 

 

 

 

 

 

138  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

174  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

223  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

373  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50    

 

 

 

 

      

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Financial Performance

 

      

 

 

 

 

50%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100    

 

 

 

 

      

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Total Performance

 

             

 

 

 

 

Total AIP Score

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

184    

 

 

 

 

58    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

Technical Solutions 2017 Metrics for Mr. Green

 

TS 2017 Metrics

 

 

 

Goals @
0%

 

  

 

Goals @
100%

 

  

 

Goals @
200%

 

  

 

Actual

 

  

 

Points

 

  

 

Weighting

 

  

 

Final AIP
Points

 

 

 

Revenue ($M)

 

 

 

 

 

 

892  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

992  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,091  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

952  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18    

 

 

 

 

 

OM—Performance (%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.30  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.60  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.90  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.21  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0    

 

 

 

 

 

FCF—Performance ($M)

 

 

 

 

 

 

9  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

44  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70    

 

 

 

 

 

Total Performance

 

             

 

 

 

 

Total AIP Score

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

88    

 

 

 

 

52    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

 

Ingalls Shipbuilding 2022 Metrics for Ms. Wilkinson

Ingalls 2022 Metrics

 

Goals @

0%

  

Goals @

100%

  

Goals @

200%

  Performance
Results
  Points
Earned
  Weighting  

Final AIP

Points

 

Operational Metrics

 

       

Operational Performance (Safety, Quality, Cost, Schedule, Cross-Shipbuilding Collaboration, Diversity and Inclusion, President Specific)

  0   100   200   137   137   50%   68 
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial Metrics

       

OM—Performance (%)

  9.00   10.00   11.00   11.36   100   

OCF—Performance ($M)

 

 

220

 

 

 

270

 

 

 

295

 

 

 

320

 

 

 

100

 

  
     

 

 

   

Financial Performance

     

 

200

 

 

 

40%

 

 

 

80

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Shipbuilding Operating Margin Metric

       

Combined Shipbuilding OM (%)

 

 

7.00

 

 

 

8.00

 

 

 

9.00

 

 

 

7.70

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

7

 

       

 

 

 

Total Performance (DPF)

             

 

Total AIP Score

 

 

 

155

 

Newport News Shipbuilding 20172022 Metrics for Mr. MulherinMs. Boykin

 

NNS 2017 Metrics

 

 

Goals @
0%

 

 

 

Goals @
100%

 

 

 

Goals @
200%

 

 

 

Actual

 

 

 

Points

 

 

 

Weighting

 

 

 

Final AIP
Points

 

 

NNS 2022 Metrics

 

Goals @

0%

 

Goals @

100%

 

Goals @

200%

 Performance
Results
 Points
Earned
 Weighting 

Final AIP

Points

 

Operational Metrics

              

Operational Performance (Safety, Quality, Cost, Schedule, Site President Specific)

 

 

 

 

 

0  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

119  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

119  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59    

 

 

 

 

Operational Performance (Safety, Quality, Cost, Schedule, Cross-Shipbuilding Collaboration, Diversity and Inclusion, President Specific)

 0  100  200  125  125  50%  63 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

   

 

 

Financial Metrics

              

OM—Performance (%)

 

 

 

 

 

8.40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.80  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.25  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.50  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6    

 

 

 

 

  6.00   7.00   7.50   6.10   5   

FCF—Performance ($M)

 

 

 

 

 

344  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

364  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

384  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

219  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0    

 

 

 

 

OCF—Performance ($M)

 

 

384

 

 

 

434

 

 

 

459

 

 

 

518

 

 

 


100


 


  
      

 

  

 

      

 

   

Financial Performance

      

 

 

 

 

50%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6    

 

 

 

 

     

 

105

 

 

 

40%

 

 

 

42

 

      

 

  

 

      

 

   

 

 

Total Performance

 

 

 

 

 

Total AIP Score

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65    

 

 

 

 

Shipbuilding Operating Margin Metric

       

Combined Shipbuilding OM (%)

 

 

7.00

 

 

 

8.00

 

 

 

9.00

 

 

 

7.70

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

7

 

       

 

 

Total Performance (DPF)

 

 

Total AIP Score

 

 

 

112

 

Payouts to NEOs under the AIP could have ranged from 0% to 200% of each NEO’s Target Bonus. For 2017,2022, the Committee exercised discretion to adjust the DPFAIP scores for both the Technical SolutionsMission Technologies division and Newport News Shipbuilding divisions,the corporate office based upon certainon non-recurring items. The items for Mission Technologies, including significant unidentified new work challenges and integration activities with respect to several business units. Based on adjustments for Newport News Shipbuilding were based upon strategic business decisions made after the 2017 goals were approved, as well as continuing significant support provided to Technical Solutions to facilitate its business growth. For Technical Solutions, adjustments were based upon the net impact on Technical Solutions of the bankruptcy of Westinghouse, a significant customer.

Based upon these adjustmentsitems and a review of overall financial and operational performance, the Committee increased the Mission Technologies AIP score and approved final DPFsa corresponding reduction in the AIP score for the corporate office to 147, which represents the percentage of 135%, 100%target incentive compensation at which payments were made to the corporate office.

2022 AIP payouts for the NEOs at the Ingalls Shipbuilding and 176% for Technical Solutions, Newport News Shipbuilding divisions were made at the performance scores reflected in the tables above, and corporate, respectively.the performance scores represent the percentage of target incentive compensation at which payouts were made.

2018 Technical Solutions

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    59


Executive Compensation

2023 Annual Incentive Plan GoalsPerformance Metric Changes

For 2018, we have added an additional metric2023, the Committee approved a change to the metrics utilized to measure performance for the Technical Solutionscorporate office and division under our AIP. Theannual incentive awards. For AIP awards covering the performance scoreperiod of January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023, a metric related to strategic leadership, comprised of leadership, sustainability, cybersecurity and compliance goals, will be based uponadded to the Technical Solutions division financial metrics described above, as well as division management goals to drive performance onnon-financial division objectives.AIP.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation Awards

Our long-term incentive compensation goals are intended to reward three-year performance increments based primarily onupon the achievement of financial metrics. Long-term incentive compensation for our NEOs is provided in the form of Restricted Performance Stock Rights (“RPSRs”). Each RPSR represents the right to receive one share of our common stock, or cash of equivalent value, subject to vesting as provided in the award. Vesting occurs oncewhen the Committee determines thatthe extent to which the applicable performance criteria for the performance period have been satisfied.achieved. Earned RPSRs may be paid out in shares of our common stock or, at the discretion of the Committee, cash. RPSRs include dividend equivalent units or DEUs,(“DEUs”) that are credited to the RPSRs following payment by the company of a cash dividend on our common stock. These DEUs remain subject to the terms and conditions of the underlying RPSR grants and are paid only to the extent the underlying RPSRs vest upon satisfaction of the applicable performance criteria.

The Committee determines long-term incentive compensation target values for our NEOs based upon a peer group analysis, applying value-based guidelines that focus on the award value, rather than the

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    53


Executive Compensation

number of shares granted (share-based guidelines). The Committee believes value-based guidelines more effectively deliver long-term incentive compensation awards that are consistent with awards given toreceived by individuals holding comparable positions at peer companies.

20172022 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Awards

Long-term incentive compensation awards in 20172022 were granted under our stockholder-approved Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. 2012 Long Term Incentive Stock Plan (the “2012 Plan”). All long-term incentive compensation awards granted to our NEOs in 20172022 were in the form of RPSRs and coveredcover the performance period from 20172022 through 2019.2024. The Committee and management review and evaluate RPSR performance goals to ensure they are aligned with our long-term objectives. For the 20172022 grants, the Committee and management determined that performance for long-term incentive compensation awards to our NEOs would be measured solely in terms of overall company financial metrics: pension adjustedusing ROIC, EBITDAP and relative EBITDAP. The number of shares that ultimately vest and are issued to an NEO under an RPSR award can vary from 0% to 200% of the original number of shares granted.

Long-termFor 2022, the long-term incentive compensation targets as a percentage of base salarytarget values for our NEOs for 2017 were unchanged from the 2016 targets and were approved by the Committee as follows:

 

Name

 

  

 

Incentive Target as
% of Base Salary
(%)

 

  

 

2017 Long-Term

Incentive Target

($)

 

  

 

Actual

Award

($)

 

 

 

C. Michael Petters (1)

 

  

 

400

 

  

 

3,800,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

3,799,904

 

 

 

 

 

Christopher D. Kastner

 

  

 

220

 

  

 

1,045,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,044,897

 

 

 

 

 

Brian J. Cuccias

 

  

 

210

 

  

 

1,081,500

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,081,329

 

 

 

 

 

Kellye L. Walker

 

  

 

175

 

  

 

901,250

 

  

 

 

 

 

901,144

 

 

 

 

 

Edgar A. Green III

 

  

 

210

 

  

 

840,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

839,912

 

 

 

 

 

Matthew J. Mulherin, retired

 

  

 

210

 

  

 

1,081,500

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,081,329

 

 

 

 

Name

  

2022 Long-Term

Incentive
Compensation
Target

($)

  

Actual     

Award     

($)     

Christopher D. Kastner

   

 

4,400,000

   

 

4,399,840

     

C. Michael Petters

   

 

1,452,000

   

 

1,451,915

Thomas E. Stiehle

   

 

1,500,000

   

 

1,499,890

Chad N. Boudreaux

   

 

1,150,000

   

 

1,149,977

Kara R. Wilkinson

   

 

1,150,000

   

 

1,149,977

Jennifer R. Boykin

   

 

1,150,000

   

 

1,149,977

(1)At his request, Mr. Petters receives an annual base salary of $1, but his performance-based compensation is computed as a percentage of his 2015 base salary ($950,000).
60    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

The target dollar amounts are grant date theoretical values and not based upon any actual calculation or estimate of payout. An NEO is not guaranteed to receive any payout as a result of the 20172022 grants.

2015-20172020-2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan Goals and Results

During the first quarter of each year, the Committee reviews our financial performance over the prior three years against approved long-term incentive compensation goals to determine payout multiples for RPSRs with a performance period that ended December 31 of the prior year.

At the February 20182023 meeting, the Committee reviewed performance for the January 1, 20152020 through December 31, 20172022 performance period. PayoutsThe performance score for the 20152020 LTIP equity grants, based upon actual performance, wereas approved by the Committee, was calculated as follows:

 

 HII 2020-2022 Goals Actual Performance (Adj.) 
  

 

HII 2015-2017 Goals

   

 

Actual Performance (Adj.)

 
  

 

@ 0%

 

   

 

@ 100%

 

   

 

@ 200%

 

   

 

Actual

 

   

 

Score

 

   

 

Weighting

 

  

 

CPF

 

  

 

Goals @

0%

 

 

 

Goals @

100%

 

 

 

Goals @

200%

 

 

 

Performance
Results

 

 

Score

 

   

Weighting     

 

  

CPF

 

 

EBITDAP ($M) (1)

  

 

 

 

 

2,304

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,484

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,709

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,565

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

136

 

 

 

 

  

 

50%

 

  

 

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

 

 

2,952

 

 

 

3,102

 

 

 

3,252

 

 

2,860

 

 

0

 

  

40%

  

 

0

 

ROIC (%) (2)

  

 

 

 

 

37.60

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

40.60

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

44.40

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

63.00

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

 

  

 

50%

 

  

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

53.03

 

 

 

56.65

 

 

 

60.26

 

 

64.89

 

 

200

 

  

40%

  

 

80

 

Relative EBITDAP (%) (3)

 

 

25.00

 

 

 

55.00

 

 

 

75.00

 

 

87.50

 

 

200

 

  

20%

  

 

40

 

Total

           

 

 

 

 

Total LTIP Score            

 

  

 

 

 

 

168

 

 

 

       

Total LTIP Score

  

 

120

 

(1)

Net Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and Net Pension/Post Retirement Expense.

 

(2)

Cumulative FCF divided by average invested capital, adjusted for the net impact of the bankruptcy of Westinghouse, a significant customer of Technical Solutions.capital.

 

54    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

(3)

HII EBITDAP ending balance less HII EBITDAP beginning balance, divided by the EBITDAP beginning balance, measured against EBITDAP growth of the S&P Aerospace and Defense Select Index.

The 20152020 LTIP awards were earnedpaid out at 168%120% of target, value, and the earned RPSRs were issued on February 27, 2018.28, 2023.

Additional Benefits

We provide additional benefits to our NEOs through various plans that are also available to some or all of our other employees. Although these plans are not directly overseen by the Committee, the Committee considers benefits under these plans when considering an executive’s total annual compensation and determining the annual and long-term compensation components. These benefits are not performance-related and are designed to provide a market competitive compensation package to attract, motivate and retain the executive talent we need to achieve our business objectives. The plans include broad-based retirement plans, as well as additional supplemental executive benefits we provide.benefits. These supplemental benefits include supplemental pension plans, enhanced health and welfare benefits (dental, life, AD&D and disability) and the Special Officers Retiree Medical Plan (“SORMP”) for our former CEO upon retirement.

Defined Benefit Retirement Plans. We maintaintax-qualified defined benefit pension plans that cover all but twoone of our NEOs and the majority of our workforce. These plans are structured to retain and reward employees for long service and to recognize higher performance levels through annual pay increases. Compensation, age and service factor into the amount of the benefits provided under the plans.

We also maintainnon-tax-qualified supplemental defined benefit pension plans that cover all but twoone of our NEOs. These plans provide benefits that would have been provided under thetax-qualified plans if no limits applied to such plans under the Internal Revenue Code.Code (“IRC”). These types of benefits are common in our industry.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    61


Executive Compensation

Defined Contribution Savings Plans. We maintaintax-qualified defined contribution savings plans that cover our NEOs and the majority of our workforce. Participating employees contribute portions of their pay to the plans, and the company generally provides a matching contribution.

We also maintain twonon-tax-qualified supplemental savings plans that cover all eligible employees, including our NEOs. The Savings Excess Plan (“SEP”) allows eligible employees to defer compensation beyond the IRC limits of thetax-qualified plans and receive a matching company contribution. Eligibility begins when annual income, including base pay and bonuses, equals or exceeds $270,000,$305,000, the plan compensation limit under the Internal Revenue Code.IRC for 2022. Eligible employees under the IRC may participate in the plan in the calendar year after their total cash income meets or exceeds this limit.

The Officers Retirement Account Contribution Plan (“ORAC”) covers the majority of the company’s elected and appointed officers hired on or after July 1, 2008, who are not eligible for defined benefit pension plans. Enrollment is automatic, and the company contributes an amount equal to 4% of the officer’s eligible compensation.

Because they wereMr. Boudreaux was hired after June 30, 2008, Mr. Green and Ms. Walker arehe is not eligible to participate in the company’s qualified and nonqualified defined benefit pension plans, but they receivehe receives the SEP and ORAC benefits described above. Our other NEOs do not receive ORAC benefits. Additional information about the SEP and the ORAC is provided in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table.

Special Officer Retiree Medical Plan. Our President and Chief Executive Officer Mr. Petters is a participant in the SORMP and entitled to retiree medical benefits under the terms of the SORMP. Coverage under the SORMP is essentially a continuation of medical benefits into retirement, plus retiree life insurance. Additional information about the SORMP is provided below in the Retiree Medical Arrangement section of the Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control section and related tables.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    55


Executive Compensation

Perquisites. Our NEOs are eligible for certain executive perquisites, which include financial planning, dental coverage, physical exams, personal liability insurance and relocation benefits. These perquisites are common within our industry and comprise an important component of our total compensation package. Management and the Committee review perquisites and benefits on an annual basis to ensure they are appropriate.

Severance Benefits. Management and the Committee believe severance benefits are appropriate for a reasonable amount of time following certain terminations of employment, including a termination without cause. In addition to providing a severance plan for all employees, we maintain The Severance Plan for Elected and Appointed Officers of Huntington Ingalls Industries. Benefits under this plan for our NEOs include the following:

 

Lump Sum Cash Severance Payment—A lump sum equal to one and one half (1.5) times the sum of annual base salary and Target Bonus;

Lump Sum Cash Severance Payment—A lump sum equal to one and one half (1.5) times the sum of annual base salary and Target Bonus;

 

Extension of Medical and Dental Benefits—The employer portion of medical and dental insurance premiums for a period of 18 months following the date of termination (concurrent with COBRA);

Extension of Medical and Dental Benefits—The employer portion of medical and dental insurance premiums for a period of 18 months following the date of termination (concurrent with COBRA);

 

Financial Planning Reimbursement—Eligible expenses incurred prior to the date of termination and eligible expenses incurred in the year in which the date of termination occurs up to a maximum of $15,000, and any fees incurred in the year following the year in which the date of termination occurs up to a maximum of $15,000; and

Financial Planning Reimbursement—Eligible expenses incurred prior to the date of termination and eligible expenses incurred in the year in which the date of termination occurs up to a maximum of $15,000 ($30,000 for the CEO), and any fees incurred in the year following the year in which the date of termination occurs up to a maximum of $15,000 ($30,000 for the CEO);

 

Executive Physical Reimbursement—Eligible expenses up to $2,000 incurred through the end of the year of termination; and

Outplacement Services Reimbursement—Fees incurred within one year after the date of termination (limited to 15% of base salary as of the date of termination).

62    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

Additional Compensation Policies

Total Compensation—Tally Sheet

Management provides the Committee with a total compensation and benefits perspective for each NEO, which includes a tally sheet that captures each element of total compensation and benefits. In conjunction with the Committee’s consideration of NEO compensation compared to the company’s peer group, this tally sheet ensures that compensation decisions are made within a total compensation framework. The tally sheet provides a broad perspective that covers basic annual compensation components, as well as an annualized value of the benefits and perquisites each NEO receives. Accordingly, the values of nonqualified deferred compensation, outstanding equity awards, health and welfare benefits, pension benefits and perquisites are included.

Tax Deductibility of Pay—SectionPay-Section 162(m)

Prior to January 1, 2018, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally limited the deductibility ofnon-performance based compensation to $1 million each for a public company’s CEO and next three highest-paid executive officers (other than the CFO). Among the provisions included in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act areof 2017 (the “Tax Act”) were changes to Section 162(m). Effective January 1, 2018, the performance-basedperformance based compensation exception to the $1 million deduction limitation was repealed and the employees subject to the $1 million limitation arewere revised to include the CEO, CFO and next three highest-paid executive officers. The only exceptionAIP awards and long-term incentive compensation awards in 2022, as well as payouts on 2022 AIP awards and payouts on 2020 long-term incentive compensation awards, to this rule is for compensation that is paid pursuantexecutives subject to a binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017 that would otherwise have been deductible under prior Section 162(m) rules. Accordingly, any compensation paid in the future pursuant162 (m) are subject to new compensation arrangements entered into after November 2, 2017, even if performance-based, will count toward the $1 million annual deduction limit if paid to an executive subject to 162(m). We have not yet completed an analysis of the binding contract requirements on our various compensation plans to determine the impact of the law change.limit.

56    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

Grant Date for Equity Compensation Awards

Our annual grant cycle for long-term incentive compensation equity awards occurs simultaneously with annual salary increases and annual incentive compensation awards. We expect this to occur in the first two andone-half months of each year. This timing allows management and the Committee to make decisions on all three compensation elements at the same time to promote a total compensation review.approach.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

To promote ownership of our common stock by our executives and alignment of management and stockholder interests, we have adopted stock ownership guidelines that prescribepre-determined stock ownership levels for certain executives, expressed as a multiple of the executive’s base salary. The stock ownership guidelines prescribe the following ownership levels:

 

President and CEO—7 times base salary;

President and CEO—7 times base salary;

 

Elected officers reporting directly to the President and CEO—3 times base salary; and

Elected officers reporting directly to the President and CEO—3 times base salary; and

 

Other elected, appointed and other officers—1.5 times base salary.

Other elected, appointed and other officers—1.5 times base salary.

The ownership guidelines may be satisfied in one or more of the following ways:

 

Direct ownership of our common stock;

Direct ownership of our common stock;

 

Restricted Stock Rights (“RSRs”) (vested or unvested) granted in the form of restricted stock units and issued as part of a long-term incentive compensation award; or

Restricted Stock Rights (“RSRs”) (vested or unvested) granted in the form of restricted stock units and issued as part of a long-term incentive compensation award;

 

Equivalent shares held in our savings plan (401(k) plan); or

Equivalent shares held in our Savings Excess Plan.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    63


Equivalent shares held in our savings plan (401(k) plan).

Executive Compensation

As of February 28, 2018,2023, the percentage of stock ownership target attained by each NEO was as follows:

 

Name

 

  

Target

 

  

 

% of Target

Attained

 

Christopher D. Kastner

7 x salary

184%

C. Michael Petters

3 x salary

  

6011%

7 x salary

Thomas E. Stiehle

  

2,673%

Christopher D. Kastner

3 x salary

  

182%

Chad N. Boudreaux

3 x salary

238%

Kara R. Wilkinson

  

   753%

Brian J. Cuccias

3 x salary

  

47%

Jennifer R. Boykin

3 x salary

  

   867%

Kellye L. Walker

3 x salary

   143%

Edgar A. Green III

3 x salary

   186%

Matthew J. Mulherin, retired

n/a

    n/a

210%

Stock Holding Requirement

To supplement our stock ownership guidelines, we adopted stock holding requirements for our NEOs.NEOs and other officers. Under the holding requirements, our NEOs and other officers must hold at least 50% of the total number of shares of our common stock received as compensation until the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the date such shares are issued or (b) the date that employment terminates due to death or disability. The holding requirement continues upon termination or retirement for aone-year period after separation from the company and applies to any equity compensation award vesting in thatone-year period. Any equity compensation award vesting or stock options exercised after theone-year anniversary of retirement or termination are not subject to the holding requirement.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    57


Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation Recoupment

The Committee has adopted the Policy Regarding the Recoupment of Certain Performance-Based Compensation Payments (“clawback policy”), which requires reimbursement of all or a portion of any performance-based short-short-term or long-term cash or equity incentive compensation payments to an employee at the vice president or more senior position level, when (i) restatement of financial results is necessitated by noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws and (ii) payment of such amounts was received by the employee during the12-month period following the first public issuance or filing of the financial results that were subsequently restated. The clawback policy is in addition to any rights to repayment we may have under Section 304 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act and other applicable laws and does not limit other available remedies, including dismissing an employee or initiating other disciplinary actions.

Trading Restrictions and Policy Against Hedging and Pledging

Our insider trading policy prohibits directors, officers and employees from buying or selling securities of any company while aware of materialnon-public information about that company, subject to certain limited exceptions involvingpre-arranged trading plans, and from providing such materialnon-public information to any person who may trade on the basis of such information. This policy also prohibits directors, officers directors and certain other employees from engaging in speculative transactions in company securities, pledging company securities as collateral for a loan or other transaction or engaging in any hedging transactions involving company securities, including zero cost collar transactions and forward sale contracts. Directors, officers and certain other employees may engage in permitted transactions in our securities only during certain specified periods and after receiving authorization from our Office of the Chief Legal Officer.Corporate Secretary.

64    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management this Compensation Discussion and Analysis and, based on such review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into the Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2022.

Submitted by members of the Compensation Committee:

Victoria D. Harker, ChairChairwoman

Philip M. Bilden

Kirkland H. DonaldFrank R. Jimenez

Anastasia D. Kelly

 

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    65

58    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

20172022 Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the compensation for our 20172022 NEOs over the last three years.

Summary Compensation Table

 

Name & Principal Position

 

 

Year

 

 

Salary

($) (1)

 

 

Bonus

($) (2)

 

 

Stock
Awards

($) (3)

 

 

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (4)

 

 

Change in
Pension
Value

($) (5)

 

 

All Other
Compensation
($) (6)

 

 

Total ($)

 

 

C. Michael Petters,

President and Chief
Executive Officer

 

  

 

 

 

2017

 

  

 

 

 

1

 

    

 

 

 

3,799,904

 

  

 

 

 

1,922,800

 

  

 

 

 

2,194,062

 

  

 

 

 

57,412

 

  

 

 

 

7,974,179

 

   2016   328,847     3,799,960   2,018,750   1,000,696   57,983   7,206,236
   

 

2015

 

 

   

 

986,538

 

 

     

 

3,799,926

 

 

   

 

2,102,736

 

 

   

 

1,239,275

 

 

   

 

30,483

 

 

   

 

8,158,958

 

 

 

Christopher D. Kastner,

Executive Vice President,
Business Management
and Chief Financial
Officer (7)

  

 

 

 

2017

 

  

 

 

 

517,308

 

    

 

 

 

1,044,897

 

  

 

 

 

646,800

 

  

 

 

 

1,565,930

 

  

 

 

 

57,286

 

  

 

 

 

3,832,220

 

   

 

2016

 

 

   

 

463,462

 

 

     

 

1,044,949

 

 

   

 

565,250

 

 

   

 

1,065,316

 

 

   

 

56,323

 

 

   

 

3,195,300

 

 

                
                

 

Brian Cuccias,

Executive Vice President
and President, Ingalls
Shipbuilding division

 

  

 

 

 

2017

 

  

 

 

 

545,290

 

    

 

 

 

1,081,329

 

  

 

 

 

708,400

 

  

 

 

 

1,803,460

 

  

 

 

 

51,231

 

  

 

 

 

4,189,710

 

   2016   514,906     944,943   630,877   1,511,713   50,322   3,652,761
   2015   442,309     839,934   613,463   826,841   42,907   2,765,454
                

 

Kellye L. Walker,

Executive Vice President
and Chief Legal Officer

 

  

 

 

 

2017

 

  

 

 

 

525,894

 

    

 

 

 

901,144

 

  

 

 

 

650,342

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

168,475

 

  

 

 

 

2,245,855

 

   2016   505,096     901,249   612,850      151,352   2,170,547
   

 

2015

 

 

   

 

491,231

 

 

   

 

220,000

 

 

   

 

1,251,251

 

 

   

 

721,000

 

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

166,630

 

 

   

 

2,850,112

 

 

 

Edgar Green III,

Executive Vice President
and President, Technical
Solutions division (8)

 

  

 

 

 

2017

 

  

 

 

 

400,000

 

    

 

 

 

839,912

 

  

 

 

 

378,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

88,498

 

  

 

 

 

1,706,410

 

 

Matthew J. Mulherin,

Executive Vice President
and President, Newport
News Shipbuilding,
retired (9)

  

 

 

 

2017

 

  

 

 

 

309,000

 

    

 

 

 

1,081,329

 

  

 

 

 

224,671

 

  

 

 

 

1,503,791

 

  

 

 

 

43,098

 

  

 

 

 

3,161,889

 

   2016   515,000     1,081,472   540,750   163,722   32,012   2,332,956
   

 

2015

 

 

   

 

534,808

 

 

     

 

1,081,462

 

 

   

 

470,453

 

 

   

 

(486,616

 

)

 

   

 

59,643

 

 

   

 

1,659,749

 

 

                                        

    Name & Principal Position

 

 

Year

 

 

Salary

($) (1)

 

 

Stock

Awards

($) (2)

 

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($) (3)

 

 

 

Change in

Pension

Value and

Non-Qualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings (4)

 

  

All Other

Compensation

($) (5)

 

 

Total ($)

 

Christopher D. Kastner,

 

2022

 

1,023,077

 

4,399,840

 

1,832,443

 

 

363,888

 

 

123,018

 

7,742,266  

President and Chief

 

2021

 

683,424

 

1,999,976

 

1,260,000

 

 

 

 

54,552

 

3,997,952  

Executive Officer

 

2020

 

589,597

 

1,499,923

 

346,467

 

 

658,779

 

 

55,127

 

3,149,893  

C. Michael Petters,

 

2022

 

621,924

 

1,451,915

 

1,512,892

 

 

 

 

48,517

 

3,635,247  

Executive Vice Chairman

 2021 1 4,399,947 2,750,000  503,926  60,192 7,714,067  

of the Board

 2020 1 4,399,962 1,072,500  915,344  52,610 6,440,417  

Thomas E. Stiehle,

 

2022

 

571,154

 

1,499,890

 

676,200

 

 

664,774

 

 

108,586

 

3,520,604  

Executive Vice President and

 

2021

 

502,281

 

999,988

 

825,000

 

 

546,756

 

 

43,621

 

2,917,646  

Chief Financial Officer (6)

       

Chad N. Boudreaux,

 

2022

 

563,077

 

1,149,977

 

670,320

 

 

 

 

174,005

 

2,557,379  

Executive Vice President and

 

2021

 

520,385

 

949,855

 

787,500

 

 

 

 

108,903

 

2,366,643  

Chief Legal Officer (6)

       

Kara R. Wilkinson,

 

2022

 

512,314

 

1,149,977

 

638,600

 

 

 

 

48,735

 

2,349,626  

Executive Vice President and President, Ingalls Shipbuilding (7)

       

Jennifer R. Boykin,

 

2022

 

549,900

 

1,149,977

 

494,202

 

 

 

 

35,842

 

2,229,921  

Executive Vice President

 

2021

 

540,751

 

1,149,852

 

523,176

 

 

72,871

 

 

60,437

 

2,347,087  

and President, Newport News Shipbuilding

 

2020

 

538,327

 

1,149,777

 

247,393

 

 

1,719,315

 

 

22,488

 

3,677,300  

 

(1)

The amounts in this column represent salary earned during the year and include amounts deferred under the savings and nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

 

(2)The amount in this column represents a discretionarysign-on bonus awarded to Ms. Walker when she was hired in 2015.

(3)The dollar values shown in this column are equal to the grant date fair values of equity awards made during the year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Information about the assumptions used to value these awards can be found in Note 1918 of the financial statements included in our 20172022 Annual Report on Form10-K.

 

    

The grant date values of 20172022 RPSRs for each NEO, assuming maximum performance, were:

 

C. Michael Petters

Christopher D. Kastner

  

 

$

8,799,680

7,599,807

 

Christopher D. Kastner

C. Michael Petters

  

 

$

2,903,830

2,089,793

 

Brian J. Cuccias

Thomas E. Stiehle

  

 

$

2,999,780

2,162,657

 

Kellye L. Walker

Chad N. Boudreaux

  

 

$

2,299,954

1,802,288

 

Edgar A. Green III

Kara R. Wilkinson

  

 

$

2,299,954

1,679,823

 

Matthew J. Mulherin, retired

Jennifer R. Boykin

  

 

$

2,299,954

2,162,657

 

 

(4)(3)

The amounts reported in this column are attributable to the AIP awards earned for 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 2017,2022, but paid in 2016, 20172021, 2022 and 2018,2023, respectively. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table for more information regarding the range of AIP awards that could have been earned for 2017.2022. For Messrs. Kastner and Petters, bonus amounts are prorated based on their different positions during the year, as described above under “2022 Key Compensation Decisions.”

 

66    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    59


Executive Compensation

 

(5)(4)

The amounts reported in this column represent the changes in actuarial present values of the accumulated benefits under defined benefit pension plans, determined by comparing the prior completedyear-end amount to the coveredyear-end amount. We do not have any deferred compensation plans that provide for above market or preferential earnings.

(6)(5)

Detailed information on the amounts reported in this column is included in the All Other Compensation table below.

(7)(6)Mr. Kastner was elected Executive Vice President, Business Management

Messrs. Stiehle and Chief Financial Officer effective March 1, 2016.Boudreaux first became NEOs in 2021. Under SEC rules, we are only required to provide 20162021 and 20172022 information for Mr. Kastner, since heStiehle and Mr. Boudreaux.

(7)

Ms. Wilkinson first became ana NEO in 2016.

(8)Mr. Green was elected Executive Vice President and President of Technical Solutions effective December 1, 2016.2022. Under SEC rules, we are only required to provide 20172022 information for Mr. Green, since he first became an NEO in 2017.Ms. Wilkinson.

(9)Mr. Mulherin retired from the company effective August 1, 2017.

20172022 CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of our CEO. The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K. There are Companies may apply a variety of different methodologies, assumptions, adjustments and estimates that companies may apply in compliance with Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K; as such, the information provided should not be used as a basis for comparisoncomparisons between different companies.

For 2017,2022, the annual total compensation of the median employee of our company was $132,546,$89,990, and the annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table above, was $7,974,179.$7,742,266. Based onupon this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO in 2022, Mr. Petters,Kastner, to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 6086 to 1.

 

Summary Total

Compensation and
Pay Ratio

  

 

CEO

  

 

Median       

Employee       

  

 

Pay       
Ratio       

  

 

     $7,974,179     

 

  

 

$132,546       

 

  

 

60       

 

Summary Total
Compensation and
Pay Ratio
  CEO       Median       
Employee       
  

Pay       

Ratio       

  

 

$7,742,266      

 

  

 

$89,990

 

  

 

86       

 

In order to identifyOur process for identifying the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determinedetermining the annual total compensation of our median employee and our CEO, we took the following steps:was as follows:

We determined that, as of December 31, 2017,2022, our employee population consisted of approximately 38,92945,982 individuals. For purposes of determining our median employee, we excluded 73116 employees located in Canada, 9 employees in TrinidadEurope, Asia and 14 employees in the U.K. for aAustralia. The remaining workforce of 38,832 (excluding our CEO). was 45,865 employees. This population consisted of our full-time, part-time, temporary and seasonal employees.

Our practice is to perform the median employee analysis each year. December 31, 2017,2022, was selected as the date upon which we would identify the “median employee,” because it allowed us to identify our median employee in a reasonably efficient and economical manner.

To identify the median employee, we compared 20172022 W-2 taxable Medicare wages (Box 5) as reported to the Internal Revenue Service. This compensation measure was consistently applied to all employees included in the calculation. As a result of our analysis, we identified a new median employee for 2022.

Once we identified the median employee, was identified, we calculated annual total compensation for such employee using the same methodology we use for reporting compensation of our NEOs as reported inon the 20172022 Summary Compensation Table above. With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of the table.

 

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    67

60    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

 

All Other Compensation

 

Name

 

   

 

Non-

Qualified
Plans
Company
Match ($)

 

 

Qualified
Plans
Company
Match ($)

 

 

Health and
Welfare
Contributions
($)

 

 

Executive
Physical
($)

 

 

Financial
Planning
($)

 

 

Personal
Liability
($)

 

 

Total All Other 
Compensation 

($) 

 

 

C. Michael Petters

 

  

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

10,800

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

13,247

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

30,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,365

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

57,412

 

 

 

 

Christopher D. Kastner

 

  

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

32,502

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

10,800

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

12,775

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

545

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

664

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

57,286

 

 

 

 

Brian J. Cuccias

 

  

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

29,450

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

8,100

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

13,016

 

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

664

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

51,231

 

 

 

 

Kellye L. Walker

 

  

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

121,565

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

24,300

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

12,855

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

7,092

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

664

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

168,475

 

 

 

 

Edgar A. Green III

 

  

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

55,777

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

20,303

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

11,755

 

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

664

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

88,498

 

 

 

 

Matthew J. Mulherin, ret.

 

  

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

23,190

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

10,800

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

6,953

 

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

1,750

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

405

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

43,098

 

 

 

Name

  

 

 

Non-

Qualified

Plans

Company

Match ($)

 

Qualified

Plans

Company

Match ($)

 

Health and

Welfare

Contributions

($)

 

Executive

Physical

($)

 

Financial

Planning

($)

 

Personal

Liability

($)

 Corporate
Aircraft
($) (1)
 Relocation
($)
 Other
($) (2)
 

Total All Other

Compensation

($)

Christopher D. Kastner

  

 

2022

  

 

79,123

  

 

12,200

  

 

11,365

  

 

2,000

  

 

12,263

  

 

6,067

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

123,018

C. Michael Petters

  

 

2022

  

 

0

  

 

12,200

  

 

10,506

  

 

2,000

  

 

20,585

  

 

3,226

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

48,517

Thomas E. Stiehle

  

 

2022

  

 

43,646

  

 

12,200

  

 

10,611

  

 

0

  

 

850

  

 

1,832

  

 

0

  

 

39,368

  

 

78

  

 

108,586

Chad N. Boudreaux

  

 

2022

  

 

138,958

  

 

22,657

  

 

10,558

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

1,832

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

174,005

Kara R. Wilkinson

  

 

2022

  

 

26,968

  

 

10,167

  

 

9,272

  

 

0

  

 

495

  

 

1,834

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

48,735

Jennifer R. Boykin

  

 

2022

  

 

0

  

 

12,200

  

 

9,571

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

1,832

  

 

12,239

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

35,842

2017

(1)

Ms. Boykin used a corporate aircraft for two non-business related trips in 2022. A family member of Mr. Kastner accompanied him to a Board meeting on a corporate aircraft at no aggregate incremental cost to the company, and a family member of Mr. Stiehle accompanied him to a Board meeting on a corporate aircraft at no aggregate incremental cost to the company.

(2)

Mr. Stiehle received a gross-up payment for an expense he incurred as a result of the company’s failure to credit earnings on his non-qualified deferred compensation in 2022.

2022 Grants of Plan Based Awards

The following table provides additional information about equity andnon-equity incentive compensation awards we granted to our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2017.2022.

20172022 Grants of Plan Based Awards

 

                  

 

Grant Date  

Fair Value  

of Stock  

and Option  

Awards  

($) (3)  

 

      Estimated Potential Payouts Under
Non Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
 Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2)
 

Name

 

 

Grant Type

 

 

Grant
Date

 

 

Threshold
($)

 

 

Target

($)

 

 

Maximum
($)

 

 

Threshold
(#)

 

 

Target
(#)

 

 

Maximum
(#)

 

 

 

C. Michael Petters

 

 

Annual Incentive Plan

    

 

 

 

0

 

  

 

 

 

1,187,500

 

  

 

 

 

2,375,000

 

        
 Long-term Incentive (RPSR)

 

   

 

3/1/2017

 

 

         

 

0

 

 

   

 

17,314

 

 

   

 

34,628

 

 

   

 

3,799,904  

 

 

 

Christopher D. Kastner

 

 

Annual Incentive Plan

    

 

 

 

0

 

  

 

 

 

367,500

 

  

 

 

 

735,000

 

        
 Long-term Incentive (RPSR)

 

   

 

3/1/2017

 

 

         

 

0

 

 

   

 

4,761

 

 

   

 

9,522

 

 

   

 

1,044,897  

 

 

 

Brian J. Cuccias

 

 

Annual Incentive Plan

    

 

 

 

0

 

  

 

 

 

385,000

 

  

 

 

 

770,000

 

        
 Long-term Incentive (RPSR)

 

   

 

3/1/2017

 

 

         

 

0

 

 

   

 

4,927

 

 

   

 

9,854

 

 

   

 

1,081,329  

 

 

 

Kellye L. Walker

 

 

Annual Incentive Plan

    

 

 

 

0

 

  

 

 

 

369,513

 

  

 

 

 

739,026

 

        
 Long-term Incentive (RPSR)

 

   

 

3/1/2017

 

 

         

 

0

 

 

   

 

4,106

 

 

   

 

8,212

 

 

   

 

901,144  

 

 

 

Edgar Green III

 

 

Annual Incentive Plan

    

 

 

 

0

 

  

 

 

 

280,000

 

  

 

 

 

560,000

 

        
 Long-term Incentive (RPSR)

 

   

 

3/1/2017

 

 

         

 

0

 

 

   

 

3,827

 

 

   

 

7,654

 

 

   

 

839,912  

 

 

 

Matthew J. Mulherin, ret.

 

 

Annual Incentive Plan

    

 

 

 

0

 

  

 

 

 

224,671

 

  

 

 

 

449,342

 

        
  Long-term Incentive (RPSR)

 

   

 

3/1/2017

 

 

                  

 

0

 

 

   

 

4,927

 

 

   

 

9,854

 

 

   

 

1,081,329  

 

 

                        

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

and Option

Awards (3)
($)

 
       Estimated Potential Payouts Under
Non Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2)
 

Name

 Grant Type��Grant
Date
  

Threshold

($)

  

Target

($)

  

Maximum

($)

  

Threshold

(#)

 

Target

(#)

  

Maximum

(#)

 

Christopher D. Kastner

 Annual Incentive Plan   0   1,375,000   2,750,000     

 

 Long-term Incentive (RPSR)  3/1/2022  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 0  21,552   43,104   4,399,840 

C. Michael Petters

 Annual Incentive Plan   0   962,500   1,925,000     

 

 Long-term Incentive (RPSR)  3/1/2022  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 0  7,112   14,224   1,451,915 

Thomas E. Stiehle

 Annual Incentive Plan   0   460,000   920,000     

 

 Long-term Incentive (RPSR)  3/1/2022  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 0  7,347   14,694   1,499,890 

Chad N. Boudreaux

 Annual Incentive Plan   0   456,000   912,000     

 

 Long-term Incentive (RPSR)  3/1/2022  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 0  5,633   11,266   1,149,977 

Kara R. Wilkinson

 Annual Incentive Plan 

 

 

 

  0   412,000   824,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Long-term Incentive (RPSR)  3/1/2022  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 0  5,633   11,266   1,149,977 

Jennifer R. Boykin

 Annual Incentive Plan   0   441,252   882,504     
 

 

 Long-term Incentive (RPSR)  3/1/2022   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 0  5,633   11,266   1,149,977 

 

(1)

Amounts in these columns show the rangeranges of payouts that waswere possible under our Annual Incentive Plan based on performance during 2017,2022, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The amounts actually earned for 20172022 are included in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

(2)

These amounts reflect RPSRs granted in 20172022 under the 2012 Plan. Each RPSR represents the right to receive a share of our common stock upon vesting of the RPSR. These RPSRs and accrued DEUs are earned based upon ROIC, EBITDAP and relative EBITDAP performance over a three-year performance period commencing January 1, 20172022 and ending December 31, 2019,2024, with payout occurring in early 2020,2025, ranging from 0% to 200% of the rightsshares awarded. Accrued DEUs will be paid only to the extent the underlying shares vest based upon achievement of performance goals. Generally, an executive must remain employed through the performance period to earn an award, although vesting will be prorated if employment terminates earlier due to retirement, death or disability.

 

(3)

The amounts reported in this column represent the full grant date fair values of the equity awards computed in accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 718. In connection with the amendment of the terms and conditions of Mr. Mulherin’s RPSRs in July 2017 to provide for accelerated vesting at the time of his retirement from the company, subject to continuation of the performance periods through the respective remaining terms of the performance periods (2017, 2018 and 2019), the service period for recognition of expense under ASC 718 was shortened. The RPSR amendment did not result in a change to the fair value of the award.

 

68    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    61


Executive Compensation

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172022 Year-End

The following table summarizes the equity compensation awards made to our NEOs that were outstanding as of December 31, 2017.2022.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172022 Year-End

 

Name

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable (#)

 

  

Grant

Date

 

  

Option

Exercise

Price ($)

 

  

Option

Expiration

Date

 

  

Number of
Shares or

Units of

Stock

that Have
Not

Vested (#)

 

  

Market

Value

of
Shares
or

Units of

Stock

that
Have
Not

Vested
($)

 

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
that Have
Not
Vested
(#) (1)

 

  

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
that Have
Not
Vested
($) (2)

 

 

 

C. Michael Petters

  

 

 

 

3/1/2017

 

 

     

 

 

 

17,520

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,129,379

 

 

   3/1/2016       29,335   6,914,254 
   

 

2/23/2015

 

 

 

      

 

27,733

 

 

 

  

 

6,536,690

 

 

 

 

Christopher D. Kastner

  

 

 

 

3/1/2017

 

 

     

 

 

 

4,818

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,135,496

 

 

   3/1/2016       8,067   1,901,347 
   

 

2/23/2015

 

 

 

      

 

6,130

 

 

 

  

 

1,444,867

 

 

 

 

Brian J. Cuccias

  

 

 

 

3/1/2017

 

 

     

 

 

 

4,986

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,175,087

 

 

   3/1/2016       7,295   1,719,380 
   

 

2/23/2015

 

 

 

      

 

6,130

 

 

 

  

 

1,444,867

 

 

 

 

Kellye L. Walker

  

 

 

 

3/1/2017

 

 

     

 

 

 

4,155

 

 

 

 

 

 

979,279

 

 

   3/1/2016       6,957   1,639,876 
   

 

2/23/2015

 

 

 

      

 

6,577

 

 

 

  

 

1,550,207

 

 

 

 

Edgar A. Green III

  

 

 

 

3/1/2017

 

 

     

 

 

 

3,872

 

 

 

 

 

 

912,737

 

 

   12/1/2016       2,311   544,733 
   3/1/2016       1,932   455,279 
   

 

2/23/2015

 

 

 

      

 

1,773

 

 

 

  

 

417,929

 

 

 

 

Matthew J. Mulherin, retired

  

 

 

 

3/1/2017

 

 

     

 

 

 

4,986

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,175,087

 

 

   3/1/2016       8,349   1,967,802 
       

 

2/23/2015

 

 

 

                  

 

7,893

 

 

 

  

 

1,860,346

 

 

 

 

Name

 Number of
Securities of
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable (#)
  

Grant

Date

  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

that Have

Not

Vested (#)

  

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

that

Have

Not

Vested

($)

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

that Have

Not

Vested

(#) (1)

  

Equity

Incentive
Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned
Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

that Have

Not

Vested
($) (2)

 

Christopher D. Kastner

  

 

3/1/2022

 

     

 

21,896

 

 

 

5,051,057

 

  

 

3/1/2021

 

     

 

11,653

 

 

 

2,688,144

 

  

 

2/24/2020

 

     

 

6,846

 

 

 

1,579,137

 

C. Michael Petters

  

 

3/1/2022

 

     

 

7,226

 

 

 

1,666,812

 

  

 

3/1/2021

 

     

 

25,637

 

 

 

5,913,918

 

  

 

2/24/2020

 

     

 

20,081

 

 

 

4,632,334

 

Thomas E. Stiehle

  

 

3/1/2022

 

     

 

7,464

 

 

 

1,721,888

 

  

 

3/1/2021

 

     

 

5,827

 

 

 

1,344,072

 

  

 

2/24/2020

 

     

 

1,231

 

 

 

284,082

 

Chad N. Boudreaux

  

 

3/1/2022

 

     

 

5,723

 

 

 

1,320,184

 

  

 

3/1/2021

 

     

 

5,534

 

 

 

1,276,689

 

  

 

4/1/2020

 

     

 

3,836

 

 

 

884,969

 

  

 

2/24/2020

 

     

 

1,231

 

 

 

284,082

 

Kara R. Wilkinson

  

 

3/1/2022

 

     

 

5,723

 

 

 

1,320,184

 

  

 

4/1/2021

 

     

 

3,252

 

 

 

750,090

 

  

 

3/1/2021

 

     

 

1,278

 

 

 

294,713

 

  

 

2/24/2020

 

     

 

1,000

 

 

 

230,677

 

Jennifer R. Boykin

  

 

3/1/2022

 

     

 

5,723

 

 

 

1,320,184

 

  

 

3/1/2021

 

     

 

6,700

 

 

 

1,545,503

 

      

 

2/24/2020

 

                 

 

5,248

 

 

 

1,210,499

 

 

(1)

The numbers in this column assume target performance levels for RPSRs. The RPSR award granted in March 2017,2022, if earned, will vest based onupon performance for the three-year period ending on December 31, 2019.2024. The RPSR award granted in March 2016,February 2021, if earned, will vest based onupon performance for the three-year period ending on December 31, 2018.2023. The RPSR award granted in February 20152020 vested based upon performance for the three-year period that ended on December 31, 2017.2022. See “2015-2017“2020-2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan Goals and Results” for actual vesting amounts. The number of shares reflected in the table for the 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 awards also includes DEUs accrued through December 31, 2017.2022. DEUs vest only to the extent the underlying performance award vests.

 

(2)

The market values are based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2017,30, 2022 of $235.70.$230.68.

 

In connection with Mr. Mulherin’s retirement from the company, the terms
2023 Notice and conditions of his RPSRs were amended to provide for immediate vesting of the 2015, 2016 and 2017 RPSRs at the time of his retirement, subject to continuation of the performance periods through the respective remaining terms of the performance periods (2017, 2018 and 2019), as set forth in the terms and conditions of the RPSRs. The RPSR amendment did not result in a change to the fair value of the award.Proxy Statement    69

62    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 20172022

The following table provides additional information about the value realized by our NEOs on exercises of option awards and vesting of stock awards during the year ended December 31, 2017.2022. We did not have any stock options outstanding in 2022.

2017 Option Exercises and2022 Stock Vested

 

   

 

Option Awards

   

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

  

Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)

 

   

Value
Realized on
Exercise (1)
($)

 

   

 

Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (2)
(#)

 

   

Value
Realized on
Vesting (3)
($)

 

 

 

C. Michael Petters

 

  

 

 

 

 

262,294

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

42,791,247

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

70,716

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

15,520,040

 

 

 

 

 

Christopher D. Kastner

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

15,631

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

3,430,536

 

 

 

 

 

Brian J. Cuccias

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

15,631

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

3,430,536

 

 

 

 

 

Kellye L. Walker

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

Edgar A. Green III

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

4,424

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

970,935

 

 

 

 

 

Matthew J. Mulherin, retired

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

19,539

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

4,288,224

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

Option Awards

  

 

Stock Awards

 

Name & Principal Position

  

Number of

Shares

Acquired on

Exercise (#)

  

Value

Realized on

Exercise

($)

  

Number of

Shares

Acquired on

Vesting (1)

(#)

   

Value

Realized on

Vesting (2)

($)

 

Christopher D. Kastner

  0  0   10,418    2,126,992 

C. Michael Petters

  0  0   30,563    6,239,724 

Thomas E. Stiehle

  0  0   1,875    382,756 

Chad N. Boudreaux

  0  0   1,875    382,756 

Kara R. Wilkinson

  0  0   1,469    299,932 

Jennifer R. Boykin

  0  0   7,986    1,630,456 

 

(1)The values in this column are calculated by subtracting the exercise price of the options from the price of our common stock on the date of exercise and multiplying the result by the number of shares underlying the options. Amounts in the column may not represent amounts that were actually realized.

(2)The numbers in this column represent RPSRs that were received in 20172022 based onupon the achievement of performance goals for the three-year period from 20142019 through 2016.2021.

 

(3)(2)

The values in this column are calculated by multiplying the number of RPSRs vested by the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of vesting.

 

70    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    63


Executive Compensation

 

20172022 Pension Benefits

The following table shows the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of our NEOs under the qualified defined benefit pension plans and nonqualified defined benefit pension plans that we sponsor.

20172022 Pension Benefits

 

Name

 

 

Plan Name

 

 

 

Number of

Years

Credited

Service

 

  

 

Present Value of

Accumulated

Benefit

($) (1)

 

  

 

Payments

During Last

Fiscal Year

($)

 

 

 

C. Michael Petters (2)

 

 

 

Special Officer SERP

 

 

 

 

 

 

13.167

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,336,079

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HII NNS Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan

 

  

 

29.500

 

 

 

  

 

13,253,047

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

HII NNS Inc. Retirement Plan

 

  

 

29.500

 

 

 

  

 

1,254,805

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Christopher D. Kastner (2)

 

 

 

OSERP

 

 

 

 

 

 

26.917

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

737,385

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HII Supplemental Plan 2—ERISA 2

 

  

 

26.917

 

 

 

  

 

3,920,855

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

HII Retirement Plan “B”

 

  

 

26.917

 

 

 

  

 

1,620,323

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Brian J. Cuccias (2)

 

 

 

OSERP

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,341,263

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Avondale Supp Pension Plan

 

  

 

31.750

 

 

 

  

 

1,510,581

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

HII Litton Restoration Plan

 

  

 

31.750

 

 

 

  

 

2,614,915

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

HII Retirement Plan “B”

 

  

 

31.750

 

 

 

  

 

820,953

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Kellye L. Walker (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edgar A. Green III (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Matthew J. Mulherin, retired (2)(5)

 

��

OSERP

 

 

 

 

 

 

36.583

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,610,835

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HII NNS Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan

 

  

 

35.083

 

 

 

  

 

5,792,976

 

 

 

  

 

10,743

 

 

 

  

HII NNS Inc. Retirement Plan

 

  

 

35.083

 

 

 

  

 

1,793,052

 

 

 

  

 

39,642

 

 

 

Name & Principal Position

 Plan Name  

Number of

Years

Credited

Service

   

Present Value of

Accumulated

Benefit

($) (1)

   

Payments

During Last

Fiscal Year

($)

Christopher D. Kastner (2)

 

OSERP

  

 

31.917

 

  

 

1,316,554

 

  

 

HII Supplemental Plan 2—ERISA 2

  

 

31.917

 

  

 

6,589,339

 

  

 

HII Retirement Plan “B”

  

 

31.917

 

  

 

1,768,783

 

  

C. Michael Petters (2)

 

Special Officer SERP

  

 

17.333

 

  

 

10,060,603

 

  

 

HII NNS Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan

  

 

34.500

 

  

 

12,625,032

 

  

 

HII NNS Inc. Retirement Plan

  

 

34.500

 

  

 

1,040,977

 

  

Thomas E. Stiehle (2)

 

OSERP

  

 

36.000

 

  

 

1,995,791

 

  

 

HII Supplemental Plan 2—ERISA 2

  

 

36.000

 

  

 

2,175,228

 

  

 

HII Retirement Plan “B”

  

 

36.000

 

  

 

1,462,698

 

  

Chad N. Boudreaux (3)

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Kara R. Wilkinson (2)

 

OSERP

  

 

26.583

 

  

 

2,287,917

 

  

 

HII Litton Restoration Plan

  

 

26.583

 

  

 

179,388

 

  

 

HII Retirement Plan “B”

  

 

26.583

 

  

 

396,056

 

  

Jennifer R. Boykin (2)

 

OSERP

  

 

35.000

 

  

 

1,763,550

 

  

  

HII NNS Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan

  

 

35.000

 

  

 

2,933,984

 

  

 

HII NNS Inc. Retirement Plan

  

 

35.000

 

  

 

1,621,758

 

  

 

(1)

While benefits may be spread over different plans, it is our policy that an executive’s total benefit under these plans is essentially limited to 60% of such executive’s final average pay. The pension benefits for Mr. Petters under the Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan are based onupon an alternate formula that includes total HII service.

 

(2)

The following plans in which these executives participate were consolidated as of December 31, 2014, to form the Huntington Ingalls Industries Omnibus Supplemental Retirement Plan: HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan, HII Electronic Systems Executive Pension Plan, Avondale Industries, Inc. Restated Supplemental Pension Plan, HII Litton Industries, Inc. Restoration Plan and Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. As of December 31, 2019, the OSERP and Huntington Ingalls Industries Supplemental Plan 2—ERISA 2 were merged into the Huntington Ingalls Industries Omnibus Supplemental Retirement Plan, which was subsequently renamed the Huntington Ingalls Industries Consolidated Supplemental Retirement Plan.

 

(3)Ms. Walker

Mr. Boudreaux was hired in January 2015 and was, therefore, not eligible to participate in any historical defined benefit pension plans, which were closed to new participants in 2008. Ms. Walker does, however, participate in company sponsored defined contribution plans.

(4)Mr. Green was hired in MarchAugust 2011 and was, therefore, not eligible to participate in any historical defined benefit pension plans, which were closed to new participants in 2008. Mr. GreenBoudreaux does, however, participate in company sponsored defined contribution plans.

(5)Mr. Mulherin retired on August 1, 2017, and elected the joint and 100% to surviving spouse option for his pension benefits payable under the HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan, HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan and OSERP.

64    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

The pension values represent the present values of the benefits expected to be paid in the future. They do not represent actual lump sum values that may be paid from a plan. The amount of future payments is based on the current accrued pension benefit as of December 31, 2017.2022. Pursuant to SEC disclosure rules, (i) the actuarial assumptions used to calculate amounts for this table are the same as those used for our financial statements, and (ii) all pension values are determined assuming the NEO works until the specified retirement age, which is the earliest unreduced retirement age (as defined in each plan).

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    71


Executive Compensation

General Explanation of the Pension Benefits Table

Individual employees may be covered by several different pension plans as a result of our history as a division of Northrop Grumman. However, an executive’s total benefit under the pension plans is essentially limited to 60% of his or her final average pay. The accrued tax qualified pension benefit cannot be reduced or taken away under applicable law, so all historical pension plans have been maintained.

Pension plans provide income during retirement, as well as benefits in special circumstances, including death and disability. In general, the plans are structured to reward and retain employees of long service and recognize higher achievement levels through increases in annual pay. The term “qualified plan” generally means a plan that qualifies for favorable tax treatment under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”)IRC Section 401. Savings plans (also known as 401(k) plans) and traditional pension plans are examples of qualified plans. Qualified plans apply to a broad base of employees. The term “nonqualified plan” generally means a plan that is limited to a specified group of management personnel. Our nonqualified plans supplement our qualified plans and (1) provide benefits that would be provided under our qualified plans if there were no limitations imposed by the IRC and (2) provide a minimum level of pension benefits to our executives in recognition of their higher levels of responsibility.

The amounts in the table are based onupon the specific provisions of each plan, which are described in more detail below. Two basic types of pension benefits are reflected in the Pension Benefits table: traditional benefits and cash balance benefits. For purposes of computing amounts in the table, traditional benefits are determined based on the annual pension earned as of December 31, 2017,2022, and include any supplemental payments. Cash balance benefits are based upon the account balance as of December 31, 2017,2022, plus a future interest credit, converted to an annuity using the applicable conversion factors.

Mr.Messrs. Stiehle and Kastner participatesparticipate in the Huntington Ingalls Industries Retirement Plan “B” and the Huntington Ingalls Industries Supplemental Plan 2—ERISA Supplemental Program 2. Messrs.2 (“ERISA 2”). Ms. Wilkinson participates in the Huntington Ingalls Industries Retirement Plan “B” and the HII Litton Industries, Inc. Restoration Plan. Mr. Petters and MulherinMs. Boykin participate in the HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan and the HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan. Mr. CucciasBoudreaux participates in the Huntington Ingalls Industries Retirement Plan “B”, the Avondale Industries, Inc. Restated Supplemental Pension Plan and the HII Litton Industries, Inc. Restoration Plan. Ms. Walker and Mr. Green participate in the Huntington Ingalls Industries Officers Retirement Account Contribution Plan (“ORAC”). Each NEO, except Mr.Messrs. Petters Ms. Walker and Mr. Green,Boudreaux, also participates in the Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (“OSERP”). Mr. Petters participates in the Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.

Effective December 31, 2014, the following plans in which our NEOs participate were consolidated to form the Huntington Ingalls Industries Omnibus Supplemental Retirement Plan: HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan, HII Electronic Systems Executive Pension Plan, Avondale Industries, Inc. Restated Supplemental Pension Plan, HII Litton Industries, Inc. Restoration Plan and Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. The consolidation does not affect the benefit amounts payable to the participants.

2018 Notice Effective December 31, 2019, the Huntington Ingalls Industries Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (the “OSERP”) and Proxy Statement    65


Executive Compensation

Huntington Ingalls Industries Supplemental Plan 2—ERISA 2 were merged into the Huntington Ingalls Industries Omnibus Supplemental Retirement Plan, which was subsequently renamed the Huntington Ingalls Industries Consolidated Supplemental Retirement Plan. This merger does not affect the benefit amounts payable to the participants.

The changechanges in pension values shown in the Summary Compensation Table includesinclude the effect of:

 

an additional year of service from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2017;

an additional year of service from December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2022;

 

changes in eligible pension pay;

changes in eligible pension pay;

 

72    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


changes in applicable pay cap limits; and

Executive Compensation

 

changes in actuarial assumptions.

changes in applicable pay cap limits; and

changes in actuarial assumptions.

Description of Qualified Plans

Huntington Ingalls Industries Retirement Plan “B” and HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan. The general benefit structure of these plans is similar except for the historical benefit formulas, the transition benefit formulas and the timing of the transition period, all of which are described below. The plans are qualified under IRC Section 401 and provide up to three component pieces of benefits depending on when a participant is hired and terminates. The following chart illustrates the component pieces (described in more detail after the chart):

 

  

Part B

(5-Year Transition Benefit)

Benefit based on a formula similar to

the one under the historical plan

formula during the transition period

     

Part A

Benefit under the historical plan formula before the transition period

 + or (if greater) 

+

 

Part D

Benefit under the cash balance

formula after the transition period

 =                    Pension Benefit
  

Part C

(5-Year Transition Benefit)

Benefit under the cash balance

formula during the transition period

     

The components are the historical benefit (the Part A benefit), the transition benefit (the greater of the Part B benefit or the Part C benefit) and the cash balance benefit (the Part D benefit). Eligible employees who joined a plan after the transition date associated with their pension plan accrue only the cash balance benefit (Part D) from their first date of participation.

The qualified benefit for each NEO is the sum of these three benefits (Part A + Max (Part B or C) + Part D).The transition period for the Huntington Ingalls Industries Retirement Plan “B” iswas July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2008, while the transition period for the HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan iswas January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2008. During the transition period, each eligible participant earned the greater of (i) the benefit calculated under a formula similar to his or her historical plan (Part B) or (ii) the cash balance formula benefit (Part C).

The cash balance formula (Parts C and D benefits) uses a participant’s points (age plus years of service) to determine apay-based credit amount (a percentage of eligible pay) on a monthly basis. Interest is credited monthly on the amount in the participant’s hypothetical individual account. At normal retirement age, a participant’s balance in the hypothetical account is converted into an annuity payable for life, using specified factors. There are various forms of annuities from which the participant can choose, including a single-life annuity or ajoint-and-survivor annuity.

Specific Elements of the Plans. The following paragraphs describe specific elements of the qualified plans in more detail.which our NEOs participate.

 

Formulas Under Historical Plans:

Formulas Under Historical Plans:

 

  

HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan—This plan provides a benefit equal to 55% of final average pay (as limited by IRC Section 401(a)(17)) multiplied by benefit service up to a maximum of 35 years divided by 35. Participants withpre-1997 service also have a frozen

66    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

accrued benefit with the prior NNS parent company, Tenneco. Total benefit service is used for the plan benefit, but the frozen accrued benefit with Tenneco is offset from the total benefit. Final average pay is the average of the final 60 months of base pay multiplied by 12 to determine an annual final average pay. Messrs.Mr. Petters and MulherinMs. Boykin have historical (Part A) benefits under this formula.

 

 HII Avondale Industries, Inc. Pension Plan—This plan is a legacy part of the Huntington Ingalls Industries Retirement Plan “B”2023 Notice and provides different benefits depending on whether the participant was an employee of Avondale Services Corporation (“Services”) or a Shipyard employee (“Shipyard”). The Services benefit is equal to 1.5% of final average pay (as limited by IRC Section 401(a)(17)) multiplied by benefit service. The Shipyard benefit is equal to the sum of 25% of final average pay (as limited by IRC Section 401(a)(17)) up to $6,600 and 40% of final average pay (as limited by IRC Section 401(a)(17)) in excess of $6,600 multiplied by the ratio of actual benefit service to projected benefit service at normal retirement age, prorated when projected benefit service is less than 30 years. In both cases, the benefit is offset by the annuitized value of the participant’s HII Avondale Industries, Inc. Savings Plan (“ESOP”) account, unless the participant is eligible and elects to roll over the ESOP account into the plan. The benefit amounts shown for Mr. Cuccias reflect the ESOP offset. Final average pay is the average of the five consecutive highest paid years during the last ten years of employment. Mr. Cuccias has historical (Part A) benefits under both of these formulas. Since he transferred from Shipyard to Services, his benefit is the greater of (1) the sum of his Shipyard and Services benefits based on service earned under each respective formula and (2) his Shipyard benefit as if he never transferred. The Part B benefit for Mr. Cuccias is based on the Services formula.Proxy Statement    73


Executive Compensation

 

  

HII Northrop Grumman PensionRetirement Plan—This plan is a legacy part of the Huntington Ingalls Industries Retirement Plan “B” and provides a benefit equal to 1.6667% of final average pay (as limited by IRC Section 401(a)(17)) multiplied by benefit service up to a maximum of 30 years. Final average pay is the average of the three highest-paid years during which the participant was an eligible employee of Northrop Grumman after 1996. Mr. Kastner has historical (Part A) benefits under this formula.

 

Cash Balance Formula. Table 1 shows

HII Grumman Pension Plan—This plan is a legacy part of the Huntington Ingalls Industries Retirement Plan “B” and provides a benefit equal to 1.6667% of final average pay (as limited by IRC Section 401(a)(17)) multiplied by benefit service after December 31, 1994, plus the frozen accrued benefit as of December 31, 1994. Final average pay is the average of the three highest-paid years during which the participant was an eligible employee of the company after 1996. Messrs. Stiehle and Kastner have historical (Part A) benefits under this formula.

HII Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. Retirement Plan—This plan is a legacy part of the Huntington Ingalls Industries Retirement Plan “B” and provides a benefit equal to the greater of (1) and (2), reduced by (3):

1)

60% of pre-tax deposits to the Huntington Ingalls Industries Financial Security and Savings Program (“FSSP”) retirement account and after-tax contributions to the plan.

2)

85% of pre-tax deposits to the FSSP retirement account and after-tax contributions to the plan minus 75% of the estimated primary social security benefit multiplied by the ratio of after-tax contributions to the plan and pre-tax FSSP retirement account deposits divided by after-tax contributions to the plan plus pre-tax FSSP retirement account deposits plus imputed deposits (4% of eligible pay).

3)

The annuity equivalent of the pre-tax FSSP retirement account deposits and after-tax contributions to the plan.

Ms. Wilkinson has historical (Part A) benefits under this formula. Part B is determined using the percentageabove formula with imputed deposits instead of pay credit specified at each point level for the Part C benefit for each NEO. Interest is credited monthly based on the30-year Treasury bond rate in effect four months priorpre-tax deposits to the crediting month.

FSSP retirement account and after-tax contributions.

 

For the Part D benefit, the cash balance formula for each NEO is based upon Table 2. Interest is credited monthly based on the30-year Treasury bond rate in effect four months prior to the crediting month.

Cash Balance Formula. Table 1 shows the percentage of pay credit specified at each point level for the Part C benefit for each NEO. Interest is credited monthly based upon the 30-year Treasury bond rate in effect four months prior to the crediting month.

 

For the Part D benefit, the cash balance formula for each NEO is based upon Table 2. Interest is credited monthly based on the 30-year Treasury bond rate in effect four months prior to the crediting month.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    67

74    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

 

Table 1 (Part C Formula)

 

  

 

Credit Amount

  

 

Credit Amount

Points

(attained age and total service)

  

All Eligible Pay
(%)

 

  

 

Eligible Pay in Excess of  

Social Security Wage Base  

(%)

 

  

All Eligible Pay

(%)

 

  

 

Eligible Pay in Excess of

Social Security Wage Base

(%)

 

Under 25

  

 

6.0

 

  

 

6.0

 

  

6.0

  

6.0

25 to 34

  

 

6.5

 

  

 

6.0

 

  

6.5

  

6.0

35 to 44

  

 

7.0

 

  

 

6.0

 

  

7.0

  

6.0

45 to 54

  

 

7.5

 

  

 

6.0

 

  

7.5

  

6.0

55 to 64

  

 

8.0

 

  

 

6.0

 

  

8.0

  

6.0

65 to 74

  

 

8.5

 

  

 

6.0

 

  

8.5

  

6.0

75 to 84

  

 

9.0

 

  

 

6.0

 

  

9.0

  

6.0

Over 84

  

 

9.5

 

  

 

6.0

 

  

9.5

  

6.0

Table 2 (Part D Formula)

 

  

 

Credit Amount

  

 

Credit Amount

Points

(attained age and total service)

  

All Eligible Pay
(%)

 

  

 

Eligible Pay in Excess of  

Social Security Wage Base  

(%)

 

  

All Eligible Pay

(%)

 

  

 

Eligible Pay in Excess of

Social Security Wage Base

(%)

 

Under 25

  

 

3.5

 

  

 

4.0

 

  

3.5

  

4.0

25 to 34

  

 

4.0

 

  

 

4.0

 

  

4.0

  

4.0

35 to 44

  

 

4.5

 

  

 

4.0

 

  

4.5

  

4.0

45 to 54

  

 

5.0

 

  

 

4.0

 

  

5.0

  

4.0

55 to 64

  

 

5.5

 

  

 

4.0

 

  

5.5

  

4.0

65 to 74

  

 

6.5

 

  

 

4.0

 

  

6.5

  

4.0

75 to 84

  

 

7.5

 

  

 

4.0

 

  

7.5

  

4.0

Over 84

  

 

9.0

 

  

 

4.0

 

  

9.0

  

4.0

 

Vesting. Participants vest in their program benefits upon completion of three years of service. As of December 31, 2017, each NEO (with the exception of Ms. Walker and Mr. Green) has a nonforfeitable right to receive retirement benefits, which are payable upon early (if eligible) or normal retirement, as elected by the NEO.

Vesting. Participants vest in their program benefits upon completion of three years of service. As of December 31, 2022, each NEO participating in a qualified pension plan has a non-forfeitable right to receive retirement benefits, which are payable upon early (if eligible) or normal retirement, as elected by the NEO.

 

Form of Benefit. The standard form of benefit is an annuity payable for the life of the participant. At normal retirement, the annuity for the cash balance formula is equal to the accumulated account balance divided by 9. Other annuity options may be elected; however, each option is actuarially equivalent in value to the standard form.

Form of Benefit. The standard form of benefit is an annuity payable for the life of the participant. At normal retirement, the annuity for the cash balance formula is equal to the accumulated account balance divided by 9. Other annuity options may be elected; however, each option is actuarially equivalent in value to the standard form.

 

Pay.

Pay. Pay for purposes of the cash balance, the HII Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. Retirement Plan, the HII Northrop Grumman Pension Plan formula and the HII Northrop Grumman Retirement Plan formula and the services formula of the HII Avondale Industries, Inc. Pension Plan is primarily salary plus the annual cash bonus. Final average pay for the HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan is determined using base salary only.

Normal Retirement. Normal retirement means the benefit is not reduced for early commencement. It is generally specified in each formula as: age 65 for the HII Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. Retirement

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    75


Executive Compensation

Plan, the HII Grumman Pension Plan, the HII Northrop Grumman Retirement Plan and the HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan and the Shipyard formula of the HII Avondale Industries, Inc. Pension Plan is determined using base salary only.

Normal Retirement. Normal retirement means the benefit is not reduced for early commencement. It is generally specified in each formula as: age 65 for the HII Northrop Grumman Pension Plan, HII

68    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan and HII Avondale Industries, Inc. Pension Plan formulas and the later of age 65 and three years of vesting service for the cash balance formula.

 

Early Retirement.

Early Retirement. Early retirement eligibility for the historical HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan, the HII Grumman Pension Plan (post-1994 benefits), the HII Northrop Grumman Retirement Plan and the cash balance formulas occurs when the participant both attains age 55 and completes ten years of service. Early retirement eligibility for the historical HII Grumman Pension Plan (pre-1995 benefits) occurs when the participant attains age 60 with at least one year of service or age 50 with at least 20 years of service. Early retirement eligibility for the historical HII Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. Retirement Plan occurs when the participant both attains age 55 and completes five years of service. Early retirement benefits under both the historical and cash balance formulas may be reduced for commencement prior to normal retirement to reflect the longer period of time over which the benefit will be paid.

Messrs. Petters, Stiehle and Kastner and Ms. Boykin have reached the historical HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan, the HII Northrop Grumman Pension Plan, the HII Avondale Industries, Inc. Pension Plan and the cash balance formulas occurs when the participant both attains age of 55 and completes ten years of service. Early retirement benefits under both the historical and cash balance formulas may be reduced for commencement prior to normal retirement to reflect the longer period of time over which the benefit will be paid.

All NEOs (with the exception of Ms. Walker and Mr. Green) have completed ten or more years of service. Mr. Stiehle has reached the age of 50 and completed 20 years of service. Accordingly, each of Messrs. Petters, Stiehle and Kastner and Cuccias will beMs. Boykin is eligible for early retirement under the Huntington Ingalls Industries Retirement Plan “B” (which includes historical benefits from the HII Northrop Grumman Pension Plan and the HII Avondale Industries, Inc. PensionNorthrop Grumman Retirement Plan) or the HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan, as applicable, upon attainment of the early retirement age requirement.applicable. Early retirement benefits for each NEO cannot commence prior to termination of employment. Ms. Wilkinson has not yet reached retirement eligibility in the defined benefit plans. Mr. Boudreaux does not participate in any defined benefit pension plans.

Description of Nonqualified Plans

Huntington Ingalls Industries Supplemental Plan 2—ERISA Supplemental Program 2. This plan is a nonqualified plan that provides benefits that would have been paid under the Huntington Ingalls Industries Retirement Plan “B” but for the IRC Section 401(a)(17) limit on the amount of compensation that must be taken into account under a qualified plan. The definition of compensation under this plan also includes compensation under deferred compensation plans. Benefits under this plan are subject to a general limitation of 60% of final average pay (reduced for early retirement, if applicable, according to the rules of the OSERP) for all company pension benefits. Optional forms of payment are generally the same as those from the qualified plan, plus a13-month delayed lump sum option on a portion of the benefit. Reductions for early retirement apply in the same manner as under the associated qualified plan.

Mr.Messrs. Stiehle and Kastner began participation underparticipating in the plan when hethey reached applicable pay grades for inclusion in the plan.

HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan. This plan is a nonqualified plan that provides benefits that would have been paid under the HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan but for the IRC Section 401(a)(17) limit on the amount of compensation that must be taken into account under a qualified plan and the IRC Section 415 limit on benefits that may be paid under a qualified plan. The definition of compensation under this plan also includes compensation under deferred compensation plans. Benefits under the HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan are subject to a general limitation of 60% of final average pay (reduced for early retirement, if applicable, according to the rules of the OSERP for all pension benefits). Optional forms of payment are the same as those under the HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan. Reductions for early retirement apply in the same manner as under the HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan.

Messrs.

76    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

Mr. Petters and MulherinMs. Boykin began participation underparticipating in the HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan when they reached applicable pay grades for inclusion in the plan.

HII Litton Industries, Inc. Restoration Plan. This plan is a nonqualified plan that provides benefits that would have been paid under the Huntington Ingalls Industries Retirement Plan “B” but for the IRC Section 401(a)(17) limit on the amount of compensation that must be taken into account under a qualified plan. The definition of compensation under this plan also includes compensation under

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    69


Executive Compensation

deferred compensation plans. Benefits under this plan are subject to a general limitation for all company pension benefits of 60% of final average pay (reduced for early retirement, if applicable, according to the rules of the OSERP). Optional forms of payment are generally the same as those fromunder the qualified plan, plus a13-month delayed lump sum option on a portion of the benefit. Reductions for early retirement apply in the same manner as under the associated qualified plan.

Mr. CucciasMs. Wilkinson began participating in the HII Litton Industries, Inc. Restoration Plan on July 1, 2003, when the plan was amended to cover thenon-represented participants of HII Avondale Industries, Inc.

Avondale Industries, Inc. Restated Supplemental Pension Plan. This plan is a nonqualified plan that provides a supplemental pension equal to 15% of final averageshe reached applicable pay multiplied by a fraction of actual benefit service divided by projected years of service to early retirement date, where the fraction shall not exceed one. Final average pay is the average of the five consecutive highest paid years out of the last ten years of employment. The definition of compensation under this plan also includes compensation under deferred compensation plans. Optional forms of payment and reductionsgrades for early retirement are generally the same as those from the HII Avondale Industries, Inc. Pension Plan.

Mr. Cuccias began participatinginclusion in the Avondale Industries, Inc. Restated Supplemental Pension Plan when he was designated a participant by the Avondale board of directors.plan.

Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Program. The Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement ProgramOSERP is a nonqualified plan frozen to new entrants on July 1, 2008. Accordingly, officers hired on or after this date and any promoted officers who do not participate in a qualified defined benefit pension plan are not allowed to participate in the plan. They insteadprogram. On December 31, 2018, this program was also closed to those officers whose hire date was prior to July 1, 2008, but promotion date occurred on or after January 1, 2019. Instead, officers who were hired on or after July 1, 2008, or promoted on or after January 1, 2019, participate in the Huntington Ingalls Industries Officers Retirement Account Contribution Plan, which is a defined contribution plan arrangement.

Messrs. Cuccias,Stiehle and Kastner and MulherinMses. Boykin and Wilkinson participate in the Huntington Ingalls Industries Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Program, which provides a total pension benefit equal to a percentage of final average pay (the average pay without the IRC Section 401(a)(17) limit and including deferred compensation in the three highest-paid plan years during the greater of (i) the last ten consecutive years of participation or (ii) all consecutive years of participation since January 1, 1997) where the percentage is determined by the following formula: 2% for each year of service up to ten years, 1.5% for each subsequent year up to 20 years and 1% for each additional year over 20 and less than 45, less any other HII pension benefits. Under the Huntington Ingalls Industries Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Program,OSERP, all years of service with HII are used to determine the final percentage.

The Huntington Ingalls Industries Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement ProgramOSERP benefit, when combined with all HII pension benefits, cannot exceed the general limit of 60% of final average pay (reduced for early retirement, if applicable, according to the rules of the Huntington Ingalls Industries Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Program)OSERP). Optional forms of payment are generally the same as those under the qualified plan, plus a13-month delayed lump sum option on a portion of the Huntington Ingalls Industries Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Program benefit.

 

Normal Retirement: Age 65.

Normal Retirement: Age 65.

 

Early Retirement: Age 55 and completion of ten years of service. Benefits are reduced by the lesser of 2.5% for each year between retirement age and age 65, or 2.5% for each point less than 85 at retirement. Points are equal to the sum of age and years of service.

Early Retirement: Age 55 and completion of ten years of service. Benefits are reduced by the lesser of 2.5% for each year between retirement age and age 65, or 2.5% for each point less than 85 at retirement. Points are equal to the sum of age and years of service.

 

Vesting: Participants vest in their Huntington Ingalls Industries Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Program benefits upon attaining age 55 and completion of ten years of service or attaining age 65 and completion of five years of service. These milestones must be attained prior to termination from HII.

Vesting: Participants vest in their OSERP benefits upon attaining age 55 and completion of ten years of service or attaining age 65 and completion of five years of service. These milestones must be attained prior to termination from HII.

70    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. The Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is a nonqualified plan, limited to the Chief Executive Officer of the company

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    77


Executive Compensation

as of March 31, 2011. Mr. Petters is eligible to participate in the Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which provides a pension equal to the greater of the amount accrued under the OSERP formula or the benefit calculated using the Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan provisions.

The Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan provides a total pension benefit equal to a percentage of final average pay (the average pay without the IRC Section 401(a)(17) limit and including deferred compensation of the three highest-paid plan years after 1996) where the percentage is determined by the following formula: 3.33% for each year of service up to ten years, 1.5% for each subsequent year up to 20 years and 1% for each additional year over 20, less any other HII pension benefits accrued while a participant in the Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. Only service while a participant in the Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is used to determine the final percentage.

The Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan benefit, when combined with all pension benefits, cannot exceed the general limit of 60% of final average pay (reduced for early retirement, if applicable), according to the rules of the Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. Optional forms of payment are generally the same as those under the qualified plan, plus a13-month delayed lump sum option on a portion of the Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan benefit.

 

Normal Retirement: Age 65.

Normal Retirement: Age 65.

 

Early Retirement: The later of the first day of the month following termination or the commencement of the participant’s qualified plan benefit. Benefits are reduced by the lesser of 2.5% for each year between retirement age and age 65, or 2.5% for each point less than 85 at retirement. Points are equal to the sum of age and years of service.

Early Retirement: The later of the first day of the month following termination or the commencement of the participant’s qualified plan benefit. Benefits are reduced by the lesser of 2.5% for each year between retirement age and age 65, or 2.5% for each point less than 85 at retirement. Points are equal to the sum of age and years of service.

 

Vesting: Participants vest in their Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan benefits when they have vested in their qualified plan benefits.

Vesting: Participants vest in their Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan benefits when they have vested in their qualified plan benefits.

Huntington Ingalls Industries OmnibusConsolidated Supplemental Retirement Plan. Effective December 31, 2014, the following plans in which our NEOs participate were consolidated to form the Huntington Ingalls Industries Omnibus Supplemental Retirement Plan: HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan, HII Electronic Systems Executive Pension Plan, Avondale Industries, Inc. Restated Supplemental Pension Plan, HII Litton Industries, Inc. Restoration Plan and Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. The consolidation does not affect the benefitsbenefit amounts payable to the participants. Effective December 31, 2019, the OSERP and ERISA 2 were merged into the Huntington Ingalls Industries Omnibus Supplemental Retirement Plan, which was subsequently renamed the Huntington Ingalls Industries Consolidated Supplemental Retirement Plan. This merger does not affect the benefit amounts payable to the participants.

Section 409A Restrictions on Timing and Optional Forms of Payment. Under IRC Section 409A, employees who participate in company-sponsored nonqualified plans, such as the Huntington Ingalls Industries Supplemental Plan 2—ERISA Supplemental Program 2, the HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan, the HII Litton Industries, Inc. Restoration Plan, the Avondale Industries, Inc. Restated Supplemental Pension Plan, the Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and the Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan,OSERP, are subject to special rules regarding the timing and forms of payment for benefits earned or vested after December 31, 2004 (“post-2004 benefits”). Payment of post-2004 benefits must begin on the first day of the month coincident with or following the later of attainment of age 55 and termination from the company. The optional forms of payment for post-2004 benefits are limited to a single life annuity or a selection of joint and survivor options.

 

78    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    71


Executive Compensation

 

Specific Assumptions Used to Estimate Present Values. The following assumptions were used to estimate the present values in the Pension Benefits table:

 

Assumed Retirement Age: For all plans, pension benefits are assumed to begin at the earliest retirement age that the participant can receive an unreduced benefit payable from the plan. Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Program and Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan benefits are first unreduced once an NEO reaches age 55 and accumulates 85 points or reaches age 65. HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan and associated HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Restoration Plan benefits (Part A and B benefits) are first unreduced at the earlier of age 62 and completion of ten years of service or age 65. For the HII Avondale Industries, Inc. Pension Plan (Part A and B benefits), the associated HII Litton Industries, Inc. Restoration Plan (Part A and B benefits) and the Avondale Industries, Inc. Restated Supplemental Pension Plan, benefits are first unreduced for an NEO at age 65. For the HII Northrop Grumman Pension Plan (Part A and B benefits) and the associated Huntington Ingalls Industries Supplemental Plan 2—ERISA Supplemental Program 2 (Part A and B benefits), vested benefits are first unreduced once an NEO reaches age 55 and accumulates 85 points or reaches age 65. Given each NEO’s period of service, cash balance benefits (Part C and D benefits) will be converted to an annuity on an unreduced basis starting at age 55.

Assumed Retirement Age: For all plans, pension benefits are assumed to begin at the earliest retirement age that the participant can receive an unreduced benefit payable from the plan. OSERP and Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan benefits are first unreduced once an NEO reaches age 55 and accumulates 85 points or reaches age 65. HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan and associated HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Restoration Plan benefits (Part A and B benefits) are first unreduced at the earlier of age 62 and completion of ten years of service or age 65. For the HII Grumman Pension Plan (pre-1995 benefits), vested benefits are first unreduced at age 60. For the HII Grumman Pension Plan (post-1994 Part A and Part B benefits), the HII Northrop Grumman Retirement Plan (Part A and B benefits) and the associated Huntington Ingalls Industries Supplemental Plan 2—ERISA Supplemental Program 2 (Part A and B benefits), vested benefits are first unreduced once an NEO reaches age 55 and accumulates 85 points or reaches age 65. For the HII Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. Retirement Plan (Part A and B benefits) and the associated HII Litton Industries, Inc. Restoration Plan (Part A and B benefits), benefits are first unreduced once an NEO reaches age 60 and accumulates 80 points or reaches age 65. Given each NEO’s period of service, except Ms. Wilkinson, cash balance benefits (Part C and D benefits) will be converted to an annuity on an unreduced basis starting at age 55. Ms. Wilkinson’s cash balance benefits (Part C and D benefits) will be converted to an annuity on an unreduced basis starting at age 65.

When portions of an NEO’s benefit under the “Part A + Max (Part B or Part C) + Part D” structure have different unreduced retirement ages, the later unreduced age is used for the entire benefit.

 

Discount Rate: The applicable discount rates are as follows:

Discount Rate: The applicable discount rates are as follows:

 

Plan Name

  

 

 

12/31/2017
(%)

 

 

  

 

 

12/31/2016      

(%)     

 

 

  

 

12/31/2022

(%)

 

  

 

12/31/2021

(%)

 

Huntington Ingalls Industries Supplemental Plan 2

  

 

3.88

 

  

 

4.53    

 

  

5.46

  3.04

HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Plan

  

 

3.76

 

  

 

4.40    

 

  5.46  3.00

HII Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan

  

 

3.90

 

  

 

4.52    

 

  5.46  3.04

Huntington Ingalls Industries Retirement Plan “B”

  

 

3.86

 

  

 

4.52    

 

  5.49  2.99

Avondale Industries, Inc. Restated Supplemental Pension Plan

  

 

3.90

 

  

 

4.52    

 

HII Litton Industries, Inc. Restoration Plan

  

 

3.90

 

  

 

4.52    

 

  5.46  3.04

Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

  5.46  3.04

Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Program

  

 

3.91

 

  

 

4.54    

 

  5.46  3.04

Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

  

 

3.90

 

  

 

4.52    

 

 

Mortality Table: A variation of theRP-2014 andMP-2017 mortality tables, adjusted to reflect the company’s experience and expectations.

Mortality Table: A variation of the RP-2014 and MP-2017 mortality tables, adjusted to reflect the company’s experience and expectations.

 

Present Values: Present values are calculated using the Assumed Retirement Age, Discount Rate and Mortality Table described above; they assume nopre-retirement mortality, disability or termination and that the NEO remains employed until his earliest unreduced retirement age.

Present Values: Present values are calculated using the Assumed Retirement Age, Discount Rate and Mortality Table described above; they assume no pre-retirement mortality, disability or termination and that the NEO remains employed until his or her earliest unreduced retirement age.

 

Future Investment Crediting Rate Assumption: Cash balance amounts are projected to the Assumed Retirement Age based on the future investment crediting rate assumptions of 2.97% as of December 31, 2016, and 2.32% as of December 31, 2017.

Future Investment Crediting Rate Assumption: Cash balance amounts are projected to the Assumed Retirement Age based on the future investment crediting rate assumptions of 2.66% as of December 31, 2021, and 3.63% as of December 31, 2022. These rates are used in conjunction with the discount rate to estimate the present value amounts for cash balance benefits.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    79


Executive Compensation

Information on Executives Eligible to Retire. Ms. Boykin and Messrs. CucciasStiehle and PettersKastner are eligible to retire early and begin pension benefits immediately under all plans in which they participate. Their total annual immediate benefit, assuming they had terminated on December 31, 2017,2022, is $501,109$483,832 for Ms. Boykin, $452,510 for Mr. CucciasStiehle and $1,693,376$726,859 for Mr. Petters.

72    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

Kastner.

Mr. MulherinPetters retired on AugustJanuary 1, 2017,2023 and will receive his pension benefits from the HII Newport News Shipbuilding, Inc. Retirement Plan, the HII Newport News Shipbuilding, Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan and OSERP.the Special Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. His estimated total annual benefit payable under the joint and 100% to surviving spouse option is $496,266.$1,648,572.

20172022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the compensation of our NEOs under our nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

20172022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

Name

 

 

Plan Name

 

 

Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
(1) ($)

 

 

Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
(2) ($)

 

 

Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
(3) ($)

 

 

Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions
($)

 

 

 

Aggregate

Balance

at Last
FYE (4)

($)

 

 

C. Michael Petters

 

 

Deferred Compensation

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

415,050

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

3,738,965  

 

 

Savings Excess

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

—  

 

 

 

Christopher D. Kastner

 

 

Deferred Compensation

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

Savings Excess

 

   

 

65,005

 

 

   

 

32,502

 

 

   

 

65,364

 

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

496,177  

 

 

 

Brian J. Cuccias

 

 

Deferred Compensation

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

Savings Excess

 

   

 

45,308

 

 

   

 

29,450

 

 

   

 

72,855

 

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

525,708  

 

 

 

Kellye L. Walker

 

 

Savings Excess

  

 

 

 

60,812

 

  

 

 

 

76,015

 

  

 

 

 

36,785

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

275,454  

 

 

ORAC

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

45,550

 

 

   

 

21,232

 

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

144,755  

 

 

 

Edgar A. Green III

 

 

Savings Excess

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

30,940

 

  

 

 

 

24,012

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

171,441  

 

 

ORAC

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

24,837

 

 

   

 

20,177

 

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

159,848  

 

 

 

Matthew J. Mulherin

 

 

Deferred Compensation

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

184,279

 

  

 

 

 

-110,689

 

  

 

 

 

2,137,569  

 

 

Savings Excess

 

   

 

46,380

 

 

   

 

23,190

 

 

   

 

41,145

 

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

529,624  

 

 

  Name Plan Name 

Executive

Contributions

in Last FY
(1) ($)

  

Registrant

Contributions

in Last FY
(2) ($)

  

Aggregate

Earnings

in Last FY
(3) ($)

  

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

 

Aggregate

Balance

at Last

FYE (4)

($)

 

Christopher D. Kastner

 Deferred Compensation             
 Savings Excess  197,808   79,123   19,076    1,570,740 

C. Michael Petters

 Deferred Compensation        (498,379   4,640,561 
 Savings Excess             

Thomas E. Stiehle

 Deferred Compensation             
 Savings Excess  109,115   43,646   (172,476   715,869 

Chad N. Boudreaux

 Savings Excess  94,102   84,935   (55,594   614,409 
 ORAC     54,023   (24,462   335,304 

Kara R. Wilkinson

 Deferred Compensation             
 Savings Excess  337,102   26,968   (94,005   690,648 

Jennifer R. Boykin

 Deferred Compensation            0 
  Savings Excess        6,733    710,125 

 

(1)

Executive contributions in this column also are included in the salary andnon-equity incentive plan columns of the 20172022 Summary Compensation Table.

 

(2)

Company contributions in this column are included under the All Other Compensation column in the 20172022 Summary Compensation Table and under the 20172022 All Other Compensation table.

 

(3)

Aggregate earnings in the last fiscal year are not included in the 20172022 Summary Compensation Table because they are not above market or preferential.

 

(4)

The only amounts reflected in this column that previously were reported as compensation to the NEO in the Summary Compensation Table are executive and company contributions for the respective fiscalyear-end and only if the NEO was reported as an NEO for each respective year. Aggregate earnings in this column were not reported previously in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

Ms. Walker’s aggregate SEP account balance consists of $81,610 in employee contributions.

Mr. Kastner’s aggregate SEP account balance consists of $762,249 in employee contributions.

 

Mr. Mulherin’s aggregate SEP account balance consists of $298,498 in employee contributions.

Mr. Stiehle’s aggregate SEP account balance consists of $415,875 in employee contributions.

 

Mr. Cuccias’ aggregate SEP account balance consists of $228,740 in employee contributions.

Mr. Boudreaux’s aggregate SEP account balance consists of $278,954 in employee contributions.

 

Mr. Green’s aggregate SEP account balance consists of $42,086 in employee contributions.

Ms. Wilkinson’s aggregate SEP account balance consists of $685,079 in employee contributions.

 

Ms. Boykin’s aggregate SEP account balance consists of $390,259 in employee contributions.

80    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Mr. Kastner’s aggregate SEP account balance consists of $265,521 in employee contributions.

Executive Compensation

The material terms of the deferred compensation plans in which our NEOs participate are summarized below:

 

The “Deferred Compensation Plan” was the Northrop Grumman Deferred Compensation Plan, which was closed to future contributions at the end of 2010. Prior to 2011, eligible executives were allowed to defer a portion of their salary and bonus. No company contributions were made to the plan.

The “Deferred Compensation Plan” was the Northrop Grumman Deferred Compensation Plan, which was closed to future contributions at the end of 2010. Prior to 2011, eligible executives were allowed to defer a portion of their salary and bonus. No company contributions were made to the plan.

 

The “Savings Excess Plan” is described below. No above market earnings are provided under the plan.

The “Savings Excess Plan” is described below. No above market earnings are provided under the plan.

 

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    73


Executive Compensation

The Savings Excess Plan allows eligible participants to defer between 1% and 75% of salary and annual incentive payments above the limits mandated by the IRS. The company may provide a matching contribution of up to 4%, based upon a participant contribution rate of 8%. Participants are immediately 100% vested in their accounts and are allowed to make elections regarding how their account balances will be deemed invested for purposes of crediting earnings to the account by selecting investments from a limited list of investment options selected by the plan administrator.

 

The Savings Excess Plan allows eligible participants to defer between 1% and 75% of salary and annual incentive payments above the limits mandated by the IRS. The company provides a matching contribution of up to 4%, based on a participant contribution rate of 8%. Participants are immediately 100% vested in their accounts and are allowed to make elections regarding how their account balances will be deemed invested for purposes of crediting earnings to the account by selecting investments from a limited list of investment options selected by the administrator.

Based upon an advance election, payment is made in a lump sum or installments over a period of up to 15 years. Neither in-service distributions nor hardship withdrawals are allowed under this plan.

 

Based upon an advance election, payment is made in a lump sum or installments over a period of up to 15 years. Neitherin-service distributions nor hardship withdrawals are allowed under this plan.

The “ORAC” covers those elected and appointed officers hired on or after July 1, 2008, who are not eligible for defined benefit retirement plans. Enrollment is automatic, and the company contributes an amount equal to 4% of the officer’s eligible compensation.

The “ORAC” covers the majority of those elected and appointed officers hired on or after July 1, 2008, who are not eligible for defined benefit retirement plans. Enrollment is automatic, and the company contributes an amount equal to 4% of the officer’s eligible compensation.

All deferred compensation that was not earned and vested before January 1, 2005, is subject to the requirements of IRC Section 409A. Those requirements largely restrict an executive’s ability to control the form and timing of distributions from nonqualified plans such as those listed in this table.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The tables below provide estimated payments and benefits that we would have provided each NEO if his or her employment had terminated on December 31, 2017,2022, for specified reasons. This information is based upon the assumption that employment terminates on December 31, 2017,2022, and uses the closing price of our common stock of $235.70$230.68 on the NYSE as of December 29, 2017.30, 2022. These payments and benefits are provided under the following plans:

 

The Severance Plan for Elected and Appointed Officers

The Severance Plan for Elected and Appointed Officers

 

The 2012 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan and terms and conditions of equity awards

The 2012 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan and terms and conditions of equity awards

 

The Special Officer Retiree Medical Plan

The Special Officer Retiree Medical Plan

We summarize below these plans before providing the estimated payment and benefit amounts in the tables. Due to the many factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided upon the termination events discussed below, any actual amounts paid or distributed to our NEOs may be different. Factors that may affect these amounts include timing during the year of the occurrence of the event, our stock price and the NEO’s age.

The amounts described in the tables below are in addition to each NEO’s benefits described in the Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation tables, as well as benefits generally available to our employees such as distributions under our 401(k) plan, disability and life insurance benefits and accrued vacation.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    81


Executive Compensation

Severance Plan

Upon a “qualifying termination” (defined below), we have discretion to provide severance benefits to our NEOs under The Severance Plan for Elected and Appointed Officers of Huntington Ingalls Industries (“Severance(the “Severance Plan”). Provided the NEO signed a release, such executive would have received:

 

a lump sum severance benefit equal to 1.5 times base salary and target bonus;

a lump sum severance benefit equal to 1.5 times base salary and target bonus;

 

continued medical and dental premium payments for 18 months following the date of termination;

continued medical and dental premium payments for 18 months following the date of termination;

 

74    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

financial planning expense reimbursement for fees incurred in the year in which the date of termination occurs ((limited to $15,000) ($30,000 for the CEO)) and any fees incurred in the year following the year in which the date of termination occurs ((limited to $15,000) ($30,000 for the CEO));

 

financial planning expense reimbursement for fees incurred in the year in which the date of termination occurs (limited to $15,000) and any fees incurred in the year following the year in which the date of termination occurs (limited to $15,000); and

reimbursement for the cost of a qualified executive physical as part of the executive perquisites program within established limits (up to $2,000) through the end of the year of termination; and

 

outplacement services reimbursement for fees incurred within one year after the date of termination (limited to 15% of base salary as of the date of termination).

out placement services reimbursement for fees incurred within one year after the date of termination (limited to 15% of base salary as of the date of termination).

A “qualifying termination” means one of the following:

 

an involuntary termination of employment of the NEO, other than termination for cause or mandatory retirement; or

an involuntary termination of employment of the NEO, other than termination for cause or mandatory retirement; or

 

an NEO’s election to terminate employment with us in lieu of accepting a downgrade to anon-officer position or status.

an NEO’s election to terminate employment with us in lieu of accepting a downgrade to a non-officer position or status.

Terms of Equity Awards Under the 2012 Plan

The terms of equity awards to our NEOs under the 2012 Plan provide for prorated or accelerated vesting if an NEO terminates for certain reasons. For stock options and RPSRs, accelerated vesting of a portion of each award occurs upon a termination due to death, disability or retirement (after age 55 with ten years of service or mandatory retirement at age 65). An extended exercise period is also provided for options under these circumstances. For RSRs, accelerated vesting occurs upon a termination due to death or disability.

For purposes of estimating the payments due under RPSRs below, our performance is assumed to be at target levels through the close of each three-year performance period, and we include accrued DEUs for awards granted in 2012 and later.

The terms of equity awards to our NEOs under the 2012 Plan also provide for accelerated vesting of stock options, RPSRs and RSRs in the event that the NEO is terminated in a qualifying termination related to a change in control (see“Change-in-Control Benefits” below).

Payouts of RPSRs for retirements and terminations is made during the normal process for payouts, which occurs during the first quarter following the end of the performance period.

Special Officer Retiree Medical Plan

The Special Officer Retiree Medical Plan (“SORMP”) was closed to new participants in 2007. Mr. Petters is the only NEO eligible for SORMP benefits.

82    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

NEOs who are vested participants in the SORMP are entitled to retiree medical benefits pursuant to the terms of the SORMP. The coverage is essentially a continuation of the NEO’s executive medical benefits plus retiree life insurance. A participant becomes vested if he or she has either five years of vesting service as an elected officer or 30 years of total service with the company and its affiliates. A vested participant can commence SORMP benefits at retirement before age 65 if he has attained age 55 and ten years of service. The estimated cost of the SORMP benefit reflected in the tables below is the present value of the estimated cost to provide future benefits using actuarial calculations and assumptions.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    75


Executive Compensation

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment

The following tables show the values of payments and other benefits due to our NEOs under the Severance Plan and the 2012 Plan, assuming a termination of employment as of December 31, 2017.2022.

Change-in-Control Followed by Termination Payments Summary

 

 Kastner Petters Stiehle Boudreaux Wilkinson Boykin
 

 

Petters

 

 

 

Kastner

 

 

 

Cuccias

 

 

 

Walker

 

 

 

Green

 

 

 

Mulherin

 

 

Severance

 

 

$

 

 

1,781,252

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

1,338,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

1,402,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

1,346,081

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

1,020,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $3,712,500 $2,598,750 $1,552,500 $1,539,000 $1,390,500 $1,489,226

Bonus (Actual Earned in 2017)1

 

 

$

 

 

1,922,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

646,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

708,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

650,342

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

378,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

Bonus (Actual Earned in 2022)1

 $1,832,443 $1,512,892 $672,200 $670,320 $638,600 $494,202

Unvested RS/RSU Value

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Unvested Stock Option Value

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Unvested Performance-Based RS/RSU Value2

 

 

$

 

 

22,025,273

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

5,464,221

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

5,321,844

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

5,223,503

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

2,614,870

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $9,633,889 $13,139,071 $3,406,452 $3,999,299 $2,641,286 $4,318,099

Health and Welfare Benefits

 

 

$

 

 

17,817

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

24,345

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

22,870

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

24,345

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

16,996

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $28,697 $21,433 $28,697 $27,797 $14,913 $14,582

Retiree Medical (SORMP)3

 

 

$

 

 

1,040,265

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $0 $300,384 $0 $0 $0 $0

Financial Planning and Outplacement

 

 

$

 

 

172,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

108,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

112,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

109,181

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

90,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $225,000 $145,500 $116,250 $115,500 $107,250 $112,735

Total Payments Before Excise Tax Response

 

 

$

 

 

26,959,906

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

7,582,866

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

7,568,114

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

7,353,452

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

4,119,865

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $15,432,529 $17,718,031 $5,776,099 $6,351,917 $4,792,549 $6,428,843

Forfeiture Due to Alternative Cap (If Applicable)

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

133,736

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $1,884,890 $0 $899,448 $449,085 $0 $0

Total Payments After Excise Tax Response

 

 

$

 

 

26,959,906

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

7,582,866

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

7,568,114

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

7,353,452

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

3,986,130

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A    

 

 

 

 

 $13,547,639 $17,718,031 $4,876,650 $5,902,831 $4,792,549 $6,428,843
 

 

1

Pro-rata bonus paid upon termination is based on target. Actual bonuses paid for performance during 2017 exceeded target and2022 are shown in the table above.

22015-2017

2020-2022 RPSR cycle paid based on actual performance through 12/31/2017.2022. All other unvested cycles fully accelerate at target.

3

Represents present value of the vested SORMP. Mr. Petters is the only participant in this program.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    83


Executive Compensation

Involuntary Termination Not For Cause or Good Reason Termination by Executive

 

 Kastner Petters Stiehle Boudreaux Wilkinson Boykin
 

 

Petters

 

 

 

Kastner

 

 

 

Cuccias

 

 

 

Walker

 

 

 

Green

 

 

 

Mulherin

 

 

Severance

 

 

 

 

 

$  1,781,252

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,338,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,402,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,346,081

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,020,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $3,712,500 $2,598,750 $1,552,500 $1,539,000 $1,390,500 $1,489,226

Bonus (Actual Earned in 2017)1

 

 

 

 

 

$  1,922,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   646,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   708,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   650,342

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   378,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

Bonus (Actual Earned in 2022)1

 $1,832,443 $1,512,892 $672,200 $670,320 $638,600 $494,202

Unvested RS/RSU Value

 

 

 

 

 

$                0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Unvested Stock Option Value

 

 

 

 

 

$                0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Unvested Performance-Based RS/RSU Value2

 

 

 

 

 

$16,967,602

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$2,427,377

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$3,965,326

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$2,604,348

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   702,120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $5,370,538 $10,056,725 $1,810,607 $1,402,534 $276,585 $2,922,869

Health and Welfare Benefits

 

 

 

 

 

$       17,817

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$     24,345

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$     22,870

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$     24,345

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$     16,996

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $28,697 $21,433 $28,697 $27,797 $14,913 $14,582

Retiree Medical (SORMP)3

 

 

 

 

 

$  1,040,265

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $0 $300,384 $0 $0 $0 $0

Financial Planning and Outplacement

 

 

 

 

 

$     172,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   108,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   112,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   109,181

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$     90,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 $225,000 $145,500 $116,250 $115,500 $107,250 $112,735

Total Payments

 

 

 

 

 

$21,902,236

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$4,546,022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$6,211,597

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$4,734,298

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$2,207,116

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A    

 

 

 

 

 $11,169,178 $14,635,685 $4,180,255 $3,755,152 $2,427,849 $5,033,614
 

 

1

Pro-rata bonus paid upon termination is based on target. Actual bonuses paid for performance during 2017 exceeded target and2022 are shown in the table above.

22015-2017

2020-2022 RPSR cycle paid based on actual performance through 12/31/2017.2022. Messrs. Kastner, Petters and CucciasStiehle and Ms. Boykin are retirement eligible, and unvested cycles are thereforepro-rated at target. Mr. Green,Boudreaux and Ms. Walker and Mr. KastnerWilkinson are not retirement eligible and, therefore, would forfeit the 2016-20182021-2023 and 2017-20192022-2024 cycles.

3

Represents present value of the vested SORMP. Mr. Petters is the only participant in this program.

76    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Executive Compensation

Termination Due to Death or Disability

 

 

 

Petters

 

 

 

Kastner

 

 

 

Cuccias

 

 

 

Walker

 

 

 

Green

 

 

 

Mulherin  

 

Bonus (Actual Earned in 2017)1

 

 

 

 

 

$  1,922,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   646,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   708,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   650,342

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   378,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 Kastner Petters Stiehle Boudreaux Wilkinson Boykin 

Bonus (Actual Earned in 2022)1

 $1,832,443  $1,512,892  $672,200  $670,320  $638,600  $494,202 

Unvested RS/RSU Value

 

 

 

 

 

$                0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 

Unvested Stock Option Value

 

 

 

 

 

$                0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 

Unvested Performance-Based RS/RSU Value2

 

 

 

 

 

$16,967,602

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$4,073,441

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$3,965,326

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$4,024,025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,673,041

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 $5,370,538  $10,056,725  $1,810,607  $2,693,650  $1,412,992  $2,922,869 

Retiree Medical (SORMP)3

 

 

 

 

 

$  1,040,265

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 $0  $300,384  $0  $0  $0  $0 

Total Payments

 

 

 

 

 

$19,930,667

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$4,720,241

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$4,673,726

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$4,674,367

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$2,051,041

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 $7,202,981  $11,870,001  $2,482,807  $3,363,970  $2,051,592  $3,417,071 

 

1

Pro-rata bonus paid upon termination is based on target. Actual bonuses paid for performance during 2017 exceeded target and2022 are shown in the table above.

22015-2017

2020-2022 RPSR cycle paid based on actual performance through 12/31/2017;2022; unvested cycles are prorated at target.

3

Represents present value of the vested SORMP. Mr. Petters is the only participant in this program. Amount shown is applicable only to the termination due to disability scenario.

Retirement

 

 

 

Petters

 

 

 

Kastner

 

 

 

Cuccias

 

 

 

Walker

 

 

 

Green

 

 

 

Mulherin

 

Bonus (Actual Earned in 2016)1

 

 

 

 

 

$  1,922,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   646,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   708,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   650,342

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   378,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   224,671

 

 

 

 

 Kastner Petters Stiehle Boudreaux Wilkinson Boykin 

Bonus (Actual Earned in 2022)1

 $1,832,443  $1,512,892  $672,200  $670,320  $638,600  $494,202 

Unvested RS/RSU Value2

 

 

 

 

 

$                0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 

Unvested Stock Option Value

 

 

 

 

 

$                0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 

Unvested Performance-Based RS/RSU Value3

 

 

 

 

 

$16,967,602

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$2,427,377

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$3,965,326

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$2,604,348

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   702,120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$6,268,270

 

 

 

 

 $5,370,538  $10,056,725  $1,810,607  $1,402,534  $276,585  $2,922,869 

Retiree Medical (SORMP)4

 

 

 

 

 

$  1,040,265

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$              0

 

 

 

 

 $0  $300,384  $0  $0  $0  $0 

Total Payments

 

 

 

 

 

$19,930,667

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$3,074,177

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$4,673,726

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$3,254,690

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,080,120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$6,492,941

 

 

 

 

 $7,202,981  $11,870,001  $2,482,807  $2,072,854  $915,185  $3,417,071 

 

1

Pro-rata bonus paid upon termination is based on target. Actual bonuses paid for performance during 2017 exceeded target and2022 are shown in the table above. Mr. Mulherin’s bonus ispro-rated based on an 8/1/2017 retirement date.

2

All unvested restricted stock/unit grants are forfeited upon retirement.

32015-2017

2020-2022 RPSR cycle paid based on actual performance through 12/31/2017.2022. Messrs. Kastner, Petters and CucciasStiehle and Ms. Boykin are retirement eligible, and unvested cycles are thereforepro-rated at target. Vesting of Mr. Mulherin’s outstanding awards was accelerated based on his 8/1/2017 retirement.Boudreaux and Ms. Walker and Mr. KastnerWilkinson are not retirement eligible and, therefore, would forfeit the 2016-20182021-2023 and 2017-20192022-2024 cycles.

4

Represents present value of the vested SORMP. Mr. Petters is the only participant in this program.

 

84    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

2018 Notice


Executive Compensation
Pay Versus
Performan
ce
As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are providing the following information about the relationship between compensation actually paid (“CAP”) as calculated pursuant to Item 402(v) and Proxy Statement
    77performance. This disclosure has been prepared in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and does not necessarily reflect value actually realized by the executives or how the Compensation Committee evaluates compensation decisions in light of company or individual performance. For further information concerning HII’s variable
pay-for-performance
philosophy and how the company aligns executive compensation with the company’s performance, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.
              Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
  
           
Year

(a)
 
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
first PEO
1
(b)
 
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
second PEO
1

(b)
 
Compensation
Actually Paid to
first
PEO
2
(c)
 
Compensation
Actually Paid
to second
PEO
2
(c)
 
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO

NEOs
3
(d)
 
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to
Non-PEO

NEOs
4
(e)
 
Total
Shareholder
Return
5
(f)
 
Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return
6
(g)
 
Net
Income
(millions)
7

(h)
 
EBITDAP
(millions)
8

(i)
2022  $7,742,266  $3,635,247  $9,452,779  $7,011,842  $2,664,383  $3,286,545  $98  $104  $579  $1,060 
2021  $7,714,067   n/a  $10,473,486   n/a  $2,769,626  $3,287,420  $78  $109  $544  $972 
2020  $6,440,417   n/a  $1,676,179   n/a  $3,077,970  $1,219,510  $70  $106  $696  $796 
1During 2022, two individuals served as HII’s Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”). The first PEO included in the table for 2022 is Christopher D. Kastner, and the second PEO is C. Michael Petters. The PEO for 2021 and 2020 is Mr. Petters.
2The dollar amounts reported in columns (c) represent the amount of CAP to the first PEO and the second PEO (for 2022), as computed in accordance with SEC rules. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to the PEO during the applicable year. The following adjustments were made to the PEO’s total compensation for each applicable year to determine the compensation actually paid in accordance with SEC rules:
  First PEO
Year Reported
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
First PEO
 
Reported
Value of
Equity
Awards
(a)
 
Equity Award
Adjustments
(b)
 
Reported
Change in the
Actuarial
Present
Value of
Pension
Benefits
(c)
 
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
(d)
 Compensation
Actually Paid
to First PEO
2022  $7,742,266  ($4,399,840)  $6,253,480  ($363,888)  $220,761  $9,452,779 
2021  $7,714,067  ($4,399,947)  $7,063,596  ($503,926)  $599,697  $10,473,486 
2020  $6,440,417  ($4,399,962)  ($37,104)  ($915,344)  $588,172  $1,676,179 
  Second PEO
Year Reported
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Second PEO
 
Reported
Value of
Equity
Awards
(a)
 
Equity Award
Adjustments
(b)
 
Reported
Change in the
Actuarial
Present
Value of
Pension
Benefits
(c)
 
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
(d)
 Compensation
Actually Paid
to Second
PEO
2022  $3,635,247  ($1,451,915)  $4,784,146  $0  $44,364  $7,011,842 
(a)The grant date fair value of equity awards represents the total of the amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year.
(b)
The equity award adjustments for each applicable year include the addition (or subtraction, as applicable) of the following: (i) the
year-end
fair value of any equity awards granted in the applicable year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the covered fiscal year; (ii) the amount of change in fair value as of the end of the applicable year from the end of the prior fiscal year of any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable year; (iii) for awards that are granted and vest in the same applicable year, the fair value as of the vesting date; (iv) for awards granted in prior years that vest in the applicable year, the amount equal to the change in fair value as of the vesting date from the end of the prior fiscal year; (v) for awards granted in prior years that are determined to fail to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the applicable year, a deduction for the amount equal to the fair value at the end of the prior fiscal year; and (vi) the dollar value of any dividends or other earnings paid on
2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    85

Executive Compensation
stock or option awards in the applicable year prior to the vesting date that are not otherwise reflected in the fair value of such award or included in any other component of total compensation for the applicable year. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the equity award adjustments are as follows:
  First PEO
Year Year End Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards
 Year over
Year Change
in Fair Value
of
Outstanding
and Unvested
Equity
Awards
 Fair Value as
of Vesting
Date of Equity
Awards
Granted and
Vested in the
Year
 Year over
Year Change
in Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted in
Prior Years
that Vested in
the Year
 Fair Value at
the End of the
Prior Year of
Equity
Awards that
Failed to
Meet Vesting
Conditions in
the Year
 Value of
Dividends or
other
Earnings Paid
on Stock or
Option
Awards not
Otherwise
Reflected in
Fair Value or
Total
Compensation
 Total Equity
Award
Adjustments
2022  $5,051,057  $558,459  $0  $643,963  $0  $0  $6,253,480*
2021  $4,685,308  $395,842  $0  $1,982,446  $0  $0  $7,063,596
2020  $3,274,130  ($1,612,397)  $0  ($1,698,837)  $0  $0  ($37,104)
*Does not total due to rounding.
  Second PEO
Year Year End Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards
 Year over
Year Change
in Fair Value
of
Outstanding
and Unvested
Equity
Awards
 Fair Value as
of Vesting
Date of Equity
Awards
Granted and
Vested in the
Year
 Year over
Year Change
in Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted in
Prior Years
that Vested in
the Year
 Fair Value at
the End of the
Prior Year of
Equity
Awards that
Failed to
Meet Vesting
Conditions in
the Year
 Value of
Dividends or
other
Earnings Paid
on Stock or
Option
Awards not
Otherwise
Reflected in
Fair Value or
Total
Compensation
 Total Equity
Award
Adjustments
2022  $1,666,812  $1,228,610  $0  $1,888,724  $0  $0  $4,784,146
(c)The amounts included in this column are the amounts reported in the “Change in Pension and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for each applicable year.
(d)The total pension benefit adjustments for each applicable year include the aggregate of two components: (i) the actuarially determined service cost for services rendered by Mr. Kastner and Mr. Petters during the applicable year (the “service cost”); and (ii) the entire cost of benefits granted in a plan amendment (or initiation) during the applicable year that are attributed by the benefit formula to services rendered in periods prior to the plan amendment or initiation (the “prior service cost”), in each case, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the pension benefit adjustments are as follows:
  First PEO
Year  Service
Cost
  Prior
Service
Cost
  Total
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
2022   $220,761   $0   $220,761
2021   $599,697   $0   $599,697
2020   $588,172   $0   $588,172
86    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

Executive Compensation
  Second PEO
Year  Service
Cost
  Prior
Service
Cost
  Total
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
2022   $44,364   $0   $44,364
3The dollar amounts reported in column (d) represent the average of the amounts reported for the company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Kastner (for 2022) and Mr. Petters (for 2022, 2021, and 2020) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. The NEOs for 2022 were Thomas E. Stiehle, Chad N. Boudreaux, Kara R. Wilkinson, and Jennifer R. Boykin. The NEOs for 2021 were Messrs. Kastner, Stiehle and Boudreaux, Ms. Boykin and Edgar A. Green III. The NEOs for 2020 were Mr. Kastner, Brian J. Cuccias, Mr. Green and Ms. Boykin.
4
The dollar amounts reported in column (e) represent the average amount of CAP to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Kastner (for 2022) and Mr. Petters (for 2022, 2021, and 2020). The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or paid to the NEOs as a group during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
the following adjustments were made to the total compensation for the non-PEO NEOs for each year to determine the compensation actually paid, using the same methodology described above in Note 2. The amounts presented are averages for the entire group of non-PEO NEOs:
Year 
Average
Reported
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO

NEOs
 
Average
Reported
Value of
Equity
Awards
 
Average
Equity
Award
Adjustments
(a)
 
Average
Reported
Change in the
Actuarial
Present
Value of
Pension
Benefits
 
Average
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
(b)
 
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to
Non-PEO

NEOs
2022  $2,664,383  ($1,237,455)  $1,942,396  ($166,194)  $83,415  $3,286,545
2021  $2,769,626  ($1,249,905)  $1,815,118  ($123,925)  $76,507  $3,287,420*
2020  $3,077,970  ($1,237,314)  $13,173  ($770,548)  $136,228  $1,219,510*
*Does not total due to rounding.
(a)The amounts deducted or added in calculating the total average equity award adjustments are as follows:
Year Year End Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards
 Year over
Year Change
in Fair Value
of
Outstanding
and Unvested
Equity
Awards
 Fair Value as
of Vesting
Date of Equity
Awards
Granted and
Vested in the
Year
 Year over
Year Change
in Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted in
Prior Years
that Vested in
the Year
 Fair Value at
the End of the
Prior Year of
Equity
Awards that
Failed to
Meet Vesting
Conditions in
the Year
 Value of
Dividends or
other
Earnings Paid
on Stock or
Option
Awards not
Otherwise
Reflected in
Fair Value or
Total
Compensation
 Total Equity
Award
Adjustments
2022  $1,420,610  $270,648  $0  $251,138  $0  $0  $1,942,396
2021  $1,330,968  $93,198  $0  $390,952  $0  $0  $1,815,118
2020  $920,718  ($453,429)  $0  ($454,116)  $0  $0  $13,173
(b)The amounts deducted or added in calculating the total pension benefit adjustments are as follows:
Year  
Average
Service
Cost
  
Average
Prior
Service Cost
  
Total
Average
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
2022   $83,415   $0   $83,415
2021   $76,507   $0   $76,507
2020   $92,487   $43,741   $136,228
5Cumulative total shareholder return (“TSR”) is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between the company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period.
2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    87

Executive Compensation
6Represents the peer group TSR, weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The peer group used for this purpose is the following published industry index: S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index.
7The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income reflected in the company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year.
8
EBITDAP is calculated as net earnings, plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, less net pension/post retirement benefit expense. While the company uses numerous financial and
non-financial
performance measures for the purpose of evaluating performance for the company’s compensation programs, the company has determined that EBITDAP is the financial performance measure that, in the company’s assessment, represents the most important performance measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the table) used by the company to link compensation actually paid to the company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to company performance.
Financial Performance Measures
As described in greater detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, HII’s executive compensation program reflects a variable
pay-for-performance
philosophy. The metrics we use for both our long-term and short-term incentive awards are selected based on an objective of incentivizing our NEOs to increase the value of our enterprise for our shareholders. The most important financial performance measures we used to link executive compensation actually paid to our NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to our performance are as follows:
EBITDAP
Segment operating margin
Operating cash flow
Return on invested capital
Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table
As described in more detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, HII’s executive compensation program reflects a variable
pay-for-performance
philosophy. While we utilize several performance measures to align executive compensation with company performance, all of those company measures are not presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Moreover, HII generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore does not specifically align the company’s performance measures with compensation actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
we are providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay versus Performance table.
Compensation Actually Paid and TSR/Peer TSR
LOGO
88    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

Executive Compensation
Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income
LOGO
Compensation Actually Paid and EBITDAP
LOGO
2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    89



Audit Committee Matters

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

As described more fully in its charter, among the purposes for which the Audit Committee was organized are to assist the Board in its general oversight of (a) the integrity of the company’s financial statements and the company’s accounting and financial reporting processes and financial statement audits and (b) the company’s system of internal controlscontrol over financial reporting. The Audit Committee serves a Board-level oversight role in which it provides advice, counsel and direction to management, the internal audit department and theour independent auditors on the basis of information itthe committee receives, discussionscommunications with management, the Vice President of Internal Audit and the independent auditors and the experience of the Audit Committee’sCommittee members in business and financial and accounting matters.

In discharging its oversight role, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements contained in the company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2022, with management, the Vice President of Internal Audit and the company’sour independent auditors. Management is responsible for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. The independent auditors are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee met privately with theour independent auditors and discussed issues deemed significant by the independent auditors, and the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted byapplicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.and the SEC.

In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with theour independent auditors their independence from HII and its management; received the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence; and considered whether the provision ofnon-audit services to HII by the independent auditors was compatible with maintaining the independent auditors’ independence.

In relianceBased on the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2022, for filing with the SEC.

Submitted by the members of the Audit Committee:

Stephen R. Wilson, ChairChairman

Augustus L. Collins

Leo P. Denault

Thomas C. Schievelbein

John K. Welch

 

90    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

78    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Audit Committee Matters

 

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for professional services billed to us in 20172022 and 20162021 by Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent auditors:

 

($ in thousands)

   

 

2017

 

 

 

   

 

2016

 

 

 

  2022   2021    

Fees Billed:

      

 

  

 

Audit Fees

   6,929    7,304    8,989    8,016   

Audit-Related Fees

   325    952    524    470   

Tax Fees

   36    15    395    203   

All Other Fees

   

 

3

 

 

 

   

 

3

 

 

 

   2    2   

Total

  

 

 

 

 

7,293

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

8,274

 

 

 

 

   9,910    8,691   

Audit fees for 20172022 and 20162021 related to services provided in connection with audits of our annual consolidated financial statements, including audits of internal control over financial reporting, interim reviews of our quarterly unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in Forms10-Q, statutory audits of our captive insurance subsidiary and verification of financial statements and other financial data included in securities registration statements and other documents we filed with the SEC.

Audit-related fees for 20172022 and 20162021 related to services provided in connection with audits of our employee benefit plans, of which $0 and $370,000, respectively, were paid by the plans.

Tax fees were incurred in 20172022 and 2021 for services related to nonrecurring and discrete tax projects. Tax fees for 2016 were related to services provided in support of a state tax audit and assistance with benefit plan tax forms.

All other fees for 20172022 and 20162021 includednon-audit-related fees for human resources and technical accountingon-line research tools.

AUDIT COMMITTEEPRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

All 20172022 services provided by Deloitte & Touche were approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee also reviewed these services to ensure compatibility with maintainingmaintenance of the auditor’s independence.

The Audit Committee has apre-approval policy and procedures related to the provision of services by our independent auditor. Under the policy and procedures, the Audit Committeepre-approves both the type of services to be provided by our independent auditor and the estimated fees related to those services. During the approval process, the Audit Committee considers the impact of the types of services and the related fees on the independence of the auditor. The services and fees must be deemed compatible with the maintenance of the auditor’s independence, including compliance with SEC rules and regulations.

The Audit Committee must approve any fees for audit andnon-audit services that exceed by certain amounts the estimates of fees for such services initially approved. The Audit Committee is advised quarterly in any event on the services performed by and fees paid to the independent auditoryear-to-date for the fiscal year.

 

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    91

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    79



Stock Ownership Information

 

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

The following table provides information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of February 28, 2018,2023, by:

 

each of our directors;

each of our directors;

 

each officer named in the Summary Compensation Table; and

each officer named in the Summary Compensation Table; and

 

all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

Except as otherwise provided in the footnotes below, each person identified in the following table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities owned by such person. None of our directors or executive officers have pledged any of our common stock.

As of February 28, 2018, 44,702,9222023, 39,851,829 shares of our common stock were outstanding.

 

  Shares of
Common
Stock
   Shares of
Common
Stock
Underlying
Share
Equivalents(1)
   Shares of
Common
Stock
Underlying
Restricted
Stock
Units(2)
   Total
Number of
Shares of
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned
   

Percent
of Class

(%)

 
  

 

Shares
Beneficially
Owned

 

 

 

Share
Equivalents

(1)

 

  

 

Restricted
Stock
Units
(2)

 

  

 

Total

 

  

 

Percent  

of Class  

(%)  

 

Non-Employee Directors

               

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Philip M. Bilden

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,142

 

 

 

(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

8,142

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

Augustus L. Collins

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

639

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

639

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

           6,881    6,881    * 

Leo P. Denault

           175    175    * 

Kirkland H. Donald

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

639

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

639

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

           4,254    4,254    * 

Thomas B. Fargo

   

 

 

 

 

1,923

 

 

(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

16,011

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

17,934

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

Victoria D. Harker

   

 

 

 

 

635

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

5,230

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

5,865

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

   2,603        7,252    9,855    * 

Frank R. Jimenez

           951    951    * 

Anastasia D. Kelly

   

 

 

 

 

635

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

15,048

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

15,683

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

   351        16,607    16,958    * 

Tracy B. McKibben

           3,107    3,107    * 

Stephanie L. O’Sullivan

           1,647    1,647    * 

Thomas C. Schievelbein

   

 

 

 

 

481

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

15.686

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

16,167

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

   5,847        19,410    25,257    * 

John K. Welch

   

 

 

 

 

1,142

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

1,855

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

2,997

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

   1,545        5,154    6,699    * 

Stephen R. Wilson

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

1,345

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

1,345

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

   460(3)        5,033    5,493    * 

Named Executive Officers

               

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

C. Michael Petters

   

 

 

 

 

678,114

 

 

(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

189

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

678,303

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

1.52    

 

 

 

C. Michael Petters(4)

   645,007(5)    207        645,214    1.62 

Christopher D. Kastner

   

 

 

 

 

45,178

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

45,265

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

   62,548    3,224        65,772    * 

Kellye L. Walker

   

 

 

 

 

8,219

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

454

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

8,673

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

Edgar A. Green III

   

 

 

 

 

8,521

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

8,521

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

Brian J. Cuccias

   

 

 

 

 

54,535

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

74

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

54,609

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

Matthew J. Mulherin (6)

   

 

 

 

 

113,813

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

124

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

113,937

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*    

 

 

 

Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (21 persons)

   

 

 

 

 

976,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,118

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

56,453

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

1,036,171

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

2.32    

 

 

 

Thomas E. Stiehle

   14,567            14,567    * 

Chad N. Boudreaux

   16,806    2,078        18,884    * 

Jennifer R. Boykin

   10,973    5,188        16,161    * 

Kara R. Wilkinson

   3,346            2,718    * 

Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (27 persons)

   822,147    22,096    70,471    914,714    2.30 

 

*

Less than 1%.

 

(1)

Represents share equivalents with pass-through voting rights in the Huntington Ingalls Industries Savings Plan and/or the Huntington Ingalls Industries Savings Excess Plan.

 

92    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Stock Ownership Information

(2)

Represents vested restricted stock units, which will generally become payable within 30 days following the date anon-employee director ceases to serve on the Board. A restricted stock unit is payable in either a share of common stock or, at the discretion of the Board, cash of equivalent value at the time of vesting (or a combination of cash and shares).

80    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Stock Ownership Information

 

(3)

Includes 8,000460 shares heldowned by P. Bilden Associates, LLC,a family member of which Mr. Bilden is the sole managing member.Wilson.

 

(4)Includes 978

Represents beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2022, upon Mr. Petters’ retirement as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board, and shares held in a trust, of which ADM Fargo is aco-beneficiary. ADM Fargo shares voting and dispositive power over such shares.issued on February 28, 2023, for restricted performance stock rights that vested December 31, 2022.

 

(5)

Includes 160,000174,547 shares owned by a charitable family foundation. Mr. Petters has dispositive and voting powerpowers over such shares.

(6)Reflects beneficial ownership as of August 1, 2017, the date of Mr. Mulherin’s retirement from the company.

For a description of our stock ownership guidelines and stock holding requirements, see page 57pages 63 and 64, respectively, of this proxy statement.

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

To our knowledge, as of February 28, 2018,2023, the following entities beneficially owned more than 5% of our common stock.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Title of ClassAmount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
Percent of
Class (%)

The Vanguard Group

 Common Stock4,744,21711.90(a)

Shares
Beneficially
Owned100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355

 

  

 

Percent
of
Class
(%)

 

 

The Vanguard Group

 

 

 

 

4,942,785

10.92(a)

100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355

BlackRock, Inc.

 

4,727,701

 

Common Stock

10.40(b)

3,885,4399.75(b)

55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055

 

 

 

FMR LLC

3,209,481

7.09(c)

245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210

State Street Corporation

 

2,891,110

 

Common Stock

6.37(d)

2,899,9977.28(c)

State Street Financial Center

One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111

Global Advisors Trust Company

   Common Stock   2,055,2745.16(c)

State Street Financial Center

One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111

Capital World Investors

Common Stock2,403,7946.03(d)

333 South Hope Street, 55th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071

 

(a)

This information is derived from information regarding our common stock in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) on February 12, 2018.9, 2023. According to Vanguard, as of JanuaryDecember 31, 2018,2022, Vanguard had sole voting power over 61,6590 shares of common stock, shared voting power over 14,08150,948 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power over 4,870,6944,588,926 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power over 72,091155,291 shares of common stock.

 

(b)

This information is derived from information regarding our common stock in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) on January 19, 2018.24, 2023. According to BlackRock, as of December 31, 2017,2022, BlackRock had sole voting power over 4,440,1323,574,357 shares of common stock, shared voting power over 0 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power over 3,885,439 shares of common stock and soleshared dispositive power over 4,727,7010 shares of common stock.

 

(c)

This information is derived from information regarding our common stock in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC by FMR LLCState Street Corporation (“FMR”State Street Corp”) and State Street Global Advisors Trust Company (“State Street Advisors”) on February 13, 2018.10, 2023. According to FMR,State Street Corp, as of December 29, 2017, FMR31, 2022, State Street Corp had sole voting power over 24,1790 shares of common stock, shared voting power over 2,691,738 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power over 0 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power over 2,899,797 shares of common stock. According to State Street Advisors, as of December 31, 2022, State Street Advisors had sole voting power over 0 shares of common stock, shared voting power over 899,245 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power over 3,209,4810 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power over 2,055,274 shares of common stock.

 

(d)

This information is derived from information regarding our common stock in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by State Street CorporationCapital World Investors (“State Street”CWI”) on February 14, 2018.13, 2023. According to State Street,CWI, as of December 31, 2017, State Street30, 2022, CWI had sole voting power over 2,403,794 shares of common stock, shared voting power over 2,873,6250 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power over 2,403,794 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power over 2,891,1100 shares of common stock. CWI is a division of Capital Research and Management Company (“CRMC”), as well as its investment management subsidiaries and affiliates Capital Bank and Trust Company, Capital International, Inc., Capital International Limited, Capital International Sarl, Capital International K.K., Capital Group Private Client Services, Inc., and Capital Group Investment Management Private Limited (together with CRMC, the “investment management entities”). CWI’s divisions of each of the investment management entities collectively provide investment management services under the name “Capital World Investors.” CWI is deemed to be the beneficial owner of 2,403,794 shares

 

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    93

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    81



Item 1—Proposal to Elect Ten11 Directors

 

As explained above under Governance of the Company—Board Structure, we amended our certificate of incorporation in 2015 to phase out our classified Board beginning at our annual meeting held in 2016 and ending at our annual meeting held in 2018. Withphase-out of the Board classification complete, all ten of our directors will be voted upon at our 2018 annual meeting to serveone-year terms.

NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR

The Board is nominating the ten11 individuals named below for election as directors at the annual meeting forone-year terms ending at our annual meeting in 20192024 and until their successors are elected. Leo P. Denault was elected to the Board on December 5, 2022. Stephen R. Wilson, a current member of the Board and Chairman of the Audit Committee, will retire from the Board effective at the time directors are elected at the 2023 annual meeting. Each of the nominees for director is currently serving on the Board with a term that expires at the 20182023 annual meeting. Each of the nominees will be elected if the number of shares voted in favor of such nominee exceeds the number of shares voted against such nominee. If any nominee is unable to serve as a director, which we do not anticipate, the Board by resolution may reduce the number of directors or choose a substitute nominee.

 

Philip M. Bilden

Augustus L. Collins

 

Augustus L. Collins

Leo P. Denault

 

Kirkland H. Donald

Kirkland H. Donald

 

Thomas B. Fargo

Victoria D. Harker

 

Victoria D. Harker

Frank R. Jimenez

 

Anastasia D. Kelly

Christopher D. Kastner

 

C. Michael Petters

Anastasia D. Kelly

 

Thomas C. Schievelbein

Tracy B. McKibben

 

John K. Welch

Stephanie L. O’Sullivan

 

Stephen R. Wilson

Thomas C. Schievelbein

John K. Welch

For biographical information about the nominees for director, including information about their qualifications to serve as a director, see “The Board of Directors” beginning on page 28.34.

The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the ten11 director nominees.

 

94    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

82    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.



Item 2—Proposal to Approve Executive Compensation on an Advisory Basis

 

Stockholders

Each year stockholders have the opportunity to approve, on an advisory(non-binding) basis, the compensation of our NEOs.NEOs as required under Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This vote is often referred to as“say-on-pay.” You are being asked to vote on the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the NEOs as disclosed in the compensation discussion and analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and the related narrative disclosure in this proxy statement.”

As described in detail in this proxy statement under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 38,44, our compensation programs are designed to:

 

be customer-focused, rewarding achievement of safety, quality, cost and schedule performance, and stockholder friendly, rewarding consistent achievement of strong financial results and increasing stockholder value;

be customer-focused, rewarding achievement of safety, quality, cost and schedule performance, and stockholder friendly, rewarding consistent achievement of strong financial results and increasing stockholder value;

 

influence outcomes and provide a balance between short- and long-term performances;

influence outcomes and provide a balance between short- and long-term performances;

 

incorporate clear and measurable financial results and accountabilities, with an emphasis on equity-based compensation, be formulaic in nature with appropriate levels of discretion and be market competitive;

incorporate clear and measurable financial results and accountabilities, with an emphasis on equity-based compensation, be formulaic in nature with appropriate levels of discretion and be market competitive;

 

be disclosed and explained in a transparent and understandable manner, enabling the assessment of performance by our Compensation Committee and by our stockholders through the CD&A;

be disclosed and explained in a transparent and understandable manner, enabling the assessment of performance by our Compensation Committee and by our stockholders through the CD&A;

 

produce significant individual rewards for achievement of business goals relating to both annual operating performance and increased stockholder value and reduce compensation for failure to achieve business goals;

produce significant individual rewards for achievement of business goals relating to both annual operating performance and increased stockholder value and reduce compensation for failure to achieve business goals;

 

promote alignment of management and stockholder interests by establishing and monitoring stock ownership requirements;

promote alignment of management and stockholder interests by establishing and monitoring stock ownership requirements;

 

mitigate excessive risk by emphasizing a long-term focus on compensation and financial performance; and

mitigate excessive risk by emphasizing a long-term focus on compensation and financial performance; and

 

be applied consistently for all incentive plan participants to ensure proper alignment, accountability andline-of-sight regarding commitments and priorities.

be applied consistently for all incentive plan participants to ensure proper alignment, accountability and line-of-sight regarding commitments and priorities.

We believe our compensation program, with its balance of base salary, short-term incentives (annual cash incentive awards) and long-term incentives (performance equity awards), rewards sustained performance that is aligned with long-term stockholder interests. We encourage stockholders to read the compensation discussionCompensation Discussion and analysis,Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and the related narrative disclosures contained in this proxy statement.

The Board valuesappreciates the opportunity to receive input from our stockholders.stockholders on our executive compensation. Although this vote isnon-binding, the Compensation Committee will consider the results of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions. To the extent there is any significant negative vote, we will communicate directly with our stockholders to better understand the concerns that influenced the vote.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of executive compensation of our NEOs.

 

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    95

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    83


Item 3—Proposal to Select the Frequency of Future Advisory Approvals of Executive Compensation on an Advisory Basis

 

Stockholders also have the opportunity to vote, on an advisory(non-binding) basis, on their preference of the frequency of future advisory approvals of named executive officer compensation. This vote is often referred to as “say when on pay.” You can vote on whether future advisory approvals of named executive officer compensation should occur every year, every two years or every three years, or you can abstain from voting.

After consideration, the Board recommends that future advisory approvals of executive officer compensation occur every year. The Board believes this is the optimal frequency, providing you the ability to express your views every year on our named executive officer compensation program.

The Board values the opportunity to receive input from our stockholders. Although this vote isnon-binding, the Board will consider the voting results when deciding the policy the Board will adopt on the frequency of future advisory approvals of named executive officer compensation. Notwithstanding the Board’s recommendation and the outcome of the stockholder vote, the Board may in the future decide to conduct advisory approvals on a less frequent basis and may vary its practice based on factors such as discussions with stockholders and the adoption of material changes to compensation programs.

The Board recommends a vote in favor of future advisory approvals of executive compensation EVERY YEAR.

84    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Item 4—3—Proposal to Ratify the Appointment of Independent Auditors

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP audited our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017.2022.

The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of HII and its subsidiaries for the year ending December 31, 2018,2023, and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.2023. The Board has ratified this appointment.

Although ratification of our selection of Deloitte & Touche is not required by our bylaws, NYSE listing standards or otherwise, we are asking our stockholders to do so as a matter of goodsound corporate governance. The Board valuesappreciates the opportunity to receive input from our stockholders.stockholders on the selection of our independent accounting firm. If the selection of Deloitte & Touche is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the companyHII and ourits stockholders.

Representatives of Deloitte & Touche will attend the annual meeting, will have an opportunity to make statements if they desire and will be available to respond to questions, as appropriate.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent auditors.

 

96    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    85



Item 5—4—Stockholder Proposal to Enable Stockholders to Take Action by Written ConsentRequesting that HII Disclose on its Website an Annual Report of HII’s Direct and Indirect Lobbying Activities and Expenditures

 

John R. Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, California 90278, has informed us that he intends to present the following proposal at the annual meeting and that he owns more than $2,000 of our common stock.

We are presenting the proposal and the supporting statement as they were submitted to us. While we take issue with certain of the statements contained in the proposal and the supporting statement, we have limited our response to the most important points and have not attempted to address all of the statements with which we disagree and that we believe to be unsupported and/or inaccurate.

Stockholder Proposal and Supporting Statement

Proposal [4]—Shareholder Right4—Transparency in regard to Act by Written ConsentLobbying

Shareholders request that our board

LOGO

Whereas, full disclosure of directors undertake such steps as may be necessaryHuntington Ingalls direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures to permit written consent by shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting. This written consentassess whether HII lobbying is to be consistent with applicable lawits expressed goals and consistent with giving shareholders in stockholder interests.

Resolved, the fullest power to act by written consent consistent with applicable law. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any topic for written consent consistent with applicable law.

This proposal topic won majority shareholder support at 13 major companies in a single year. This included 67%-support at both Allstate and Sprint. Hundredsstockholders of major companies enable shareholder action by written consent.

Taking action by written consent in lieuHII request the preparation of a meeting is a means shareholders can use to raise important matters outside the normal annual meeting cycle. A shareholder right to act by written consent and to call a special meeting are 2 complimentary ways to bring an important matter to the attention of both management and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle. More than 100 Fortune 500 companies provide for shareholders to call special meetings and to act by written consent. Huntington Ingalls shareholders also do not have the full right to call a special meeting that is available under Delaware law.report, updated annually, disclosing:

Adoption

1.

Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.

2.

Payments by HII used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.

3.

HII’ membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.

4.

Description of management’s and the Board’s decision-making process and oversight for making payments described in sections 2 and 3 above.

For purposes of this proposal, coulda “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. “Indirect lobbying” is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which HII is a member.

Both “direct and indirect lobbying” and “grassroots lobbying communications” include efforts at the local, state and federal levels.

The report shall be presented to the Audit Committee and posted on HII’s website.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    97


Item 4—Stockholder Proposal Requesting that HII Disclose on its Website an Annual Report of HII’s Direct and Indirect Lobbying Activities and Expenditures

Supporting Statement

HII spent $52 million from 2011 – 2021 on federal lobbying. This does not include state lobbying expenditures, where HII also lobbies but disclosure is uneven or absent. HII’s 2020 federal lobbying put it in the top ten for federal contractor lobbying.1

Companies can give shareholders a better positionunlimited amounts to engage withthird party groups that spend millions on lobbying and undisclosed grassroots activity, and these groups may be spending “at least double what’s publicly reported.”2 HII belongs to the BoardBusiness Roundtable (BRT), which has spent over $365 million on federal lobbying since 1998, and management about improving the qualifications of our directors. For instance Directors Augustus Collins and Kirkland Hogue Donald owned few shares of stock and came from a culture where following orders is paramount. Serious consideration should be given to making such directors consultants.

Adm. Donald joinedsits on the board of the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), which spent $15 million on lobbying in 20172021. HII does not disclose its memberships in, or payments to, trade associations and social welfare organizations, or the amounts used for lobbying.

HII’s lack of disclosure presents reputational risks when its lobbying contradicts company public positions. For example, while our company notes “actions to reduce the federal debt and resulting pressures on federal spending could adversely affect the total funding of individual contracts” as a business risk in its 2021 annual report, the BRT and NAM lobbied against raising corporate taxes.3 And while our company does not belong to the American Legislative Exchange Council, which is attacking “woke capitalism,”4 HII is represented by its trade association, as NAM sits on its Private Enterprise Advisory Council.

Reputational damage stemming from these misalignments could call into question our board refreshment strategy. Also our Chairman, Thomas Fargo, was the 3rd director with the same background. This may not be a good indication of board diversity.harm stockholder value. Thus, I urge HII to expand its lobbying disclosure.

Please vote to enhance shareholder oversight of management:yes:

Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent—Transparency in Lobbying—Proposal [4]4

* * * * * * *

Board Recommendation

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons.

The Board has carefully considered this proposal and believes itthat the action requested by the proposal is unnecessary and not in the best interests of the companyHII or its stockholders for the reasons set forth below.

 

1

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/moming defense/2021/01/29/defense-lobby-spending-totals-for-2020-793059.

2

https://theintercept.com/2019/08/06/business-group-spending-on-lobbying-in-washington-is-at-least-double-whats-publicly-reported/.

3

https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/08/31/business-lobbying-democrats-reconciliation/; https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/09/29/lobbyists-battle-over-democrats-35-trillion-budget-plan/.

4

https://www.exposedbycmd.org/2022/07/27/abandoning-free-market-and-liberty-principles-alec-takes-on-woke-capitalism-bodily-autonomy-and-more-at-its-annual-meeting/.

86    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

98    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Item 5—4—Stockholder Proposal to Enable Stockholders to Take Action by Written ConsentRequesting that HII Disclose on its Website an Annual Report of HII’s Direct and Indirect Lobbying Activities and Expenditures

 

HII is committed to,We Already Publish Disclosures Regarding Lobbying Activities.

We already disclose involvement in advocacy efforts at both the federal and prides itself on, high standards of corporate governancestate levels in accordance with all applicable laws and responsiveness to its stockholders. The Board believes our stockholders are better servedregulations. These disclosures include Lobbying Disclosure Act filings, which make public any federal advocacy efforts made by holding stockholder meetings for which all stockholders receive notice, and at which all stockholders have an opportunity to consider and discuss proposed actions and vote their shares, rather than utilizing an undemocratic written consent process that lacks transparency. Currently, any matter that either the company or its stockholders intendon a quarterly basis. Additionally, any political contributions made by the company at the state level are fully disclosed with each state as required by law. Stockholders also have access to present for a vote must be presented at an annual or special meeting of stockholders,disclosures made by the latter oftrade associations to which may be called upon the request of holders of at least 20%company belongs, which are also subject to public disclosure obligations regarding their lobbying efforts.

In direct response to stockholder feedback requesting enhanced disclosure, we have disclosed our lobbying policies and practices on the Investor Relations page of the voting power of our capital stock.company’s website. This modeldisclosure provides certain protections and advantages that are absent from the written consent process, including the following:

 

1.

The company’s policies and processes for political contributions.

2.

Links to the company’s most recent quarterly filings and disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act.

3.

A description of the activities and policies of the HII Political Action Committee (“HIIPAC”), a non-partisan political action committee that provides an opportunity for eligible employees to participate in the political process and provide support for positions that align with the best interests of HII.

4.

Links to HIIPAC’s most recent quarterly filings and disclosures to the Federal Election Commission.

These disclosures enable stockholders to assess whether HII’s political expenditures align with its public policy positions and statements, as well as to assess the risks presented by any potential misalignment.

We Maintain Robust Board Oversight of Political Engagement

Our Board of Directors and its committees play an opportunityimportant role in our public policy engagement and have oversight responsibilities for these activities. The Governance and Policy Committee, which comprises solely independent directors and includes directors with government relations experience, reviews and monitors the companycompany’s policies and procedures with respect to disseminate accuratesignificant public policy matters, including government relations. The Government and complete information about a proposed action to all stockholders in advance, which enables a well-informed evaluationPolicy Committee is briefed on at least an annual basis on the company’s governance of the meritspolitical activities, including oversight of the proposed action;

assures that proposed actions are submitted in accordance with the securities lawsHIIPAC and its disbursements, and the company’s bylaws;
governance of lobbying activities and the company’s lobbying expenditures, as well as the company’s recent compliance activities related to political and lobbying activity.

providesHII does not make direct contributions to candidates for public announcement of stockholder meetings and provision of informationfederal office, including presidential campaigns, nor does HII make individual expenditures that support or oppose specific campaigns. The company does not contribute to efforts to approve or defeat ballot measures in advanceany states, does not contribute to political organizations formed under Section 527 of the meeting, whichIRC, and does not contribute to “super PACs”.

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    99


Item 4—Stockholder Proposal Requesting that HII Disclose on its Website an Annual Report of HII’s Direct and Indirect Lobbying Activities and Expenditures

Our Advocacy Activities are in turn provides all stockholders sufficient time to consider the proposals and cast their votes, promoting a well-informed considerationBest Interests of the meritsCompany and Serve the Purpose of the proposed action; and

Promoting Stockholder Value

gives the Board sufficient time to analyze a proposed action and provide a recommendation to stockholders.

The written consentBoard of Directors believes that HII should be an effective participant in the political process, including through lobbying activities and participation in trade and industry associations. Our business is subject to extensive regulations at the federal, state and local levels, which have a significant impact on our business. As a leading company in the aerospace and defense sector and a significant employer in multiple states, our participation in advocacy activities allows us to advocate for policy positions, as well as share our expertise regarding issues facing our industry and the business community.

We understand that individual stakeholders may disagree with certain positions expressed by various organizations. In fact, given the variety of business issues in which many trade associations and other groups are engaged, we do not necessarily agree with all positions taken by every organization of which we are a member. We generally believe, however, that our membership in third-party organizations allows us to more effectively advance HII’s positions. The report requested in the stockholder proposal can be misleading and counterproductive to such engagement and does not provide such protections and advantages and instead undermines the important deliberative process through which the informed views of all stockholders, management and the Board are considered. Stockholder action by written consent would make it possible for the holders of a bare majority ofadd value to our outstanding common stock to take significant corporate action without any prior notice to the company or other stockholders, and without giving all stockholders sufficient opportunity to consider, discuss and vote on stockholder actions that may have important ramifications for the company and its stockholders. Because stockholder action by written consent can be effected without soliciting the consent of all stockholders, the process could be used to disenfranchise stockholders who do not have, or are not given, the opportunity to participate in the written consent. The Board believes these possible outcomes are contrary to principles of stockholder democracy and good corporate governance.

The written consent process also has the potential to create confusion because multiple groups of stockholders would be able to solicit written consents simultaneously, some of which could be duplicative or conflicting. Responding to such actions could impose significant administrative and financial burdens on the company, with no corresponding benefit to stockholders. Additionally, a written consent process has the potential to encourage short-term stock ownership by a small group of investors to advance a special agenda that may be contrary to the long-term best interests of HII and its long-term stockholders.

HII already has a varietyOur Board of strong corporate governance practices, described throughout our proxy statement, which enable ourDirectors believes HII’s lobbying activities and expenditures are transparent and that the report sought by the proponent would not provide meaningful additional information to stockholders to have a voice inmerit the governance ofresources required to provide the company, including the ability to propose actions for stockholder consideration. In particular, our bylaws already provide that, in addition to being able to propose matters for consideration at our annual meetings of stockholders, holders of at least 20% of the voting power of our capital stock may cause the company to call a special meeting of stockholders between annual meetings. These provisions allow our stockholders to bring important matters before all stockholders for consideration, while providing the Board with an adequate opportunity to examine any proposed action and provide a carefully considered recommendation to our stockholders, which would not be the case in a written consentrequested report.

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    87


Item 5—Stockholder Proposal to Enable Stockholders to Take Action by Written Consent

process. In addition, our bylaws provide our stockholders with a meaningful proxy access right, and we: annually elect all Board members (starting at this year’s annual stockholder meeting); have adopted a director resignation policy for directors for whom more votes are withheld than are cast for election; and DO NOT have a stockholder rights plan, or “poison pill.” Finally, as described on page 2, we believe stockholder engagement is an essential element of strong corporate governance and actively engage with our investors through a variety of means to understand their perspectives on our company, including in respect of corporate governance matters, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide clear avenues for communication with members of our Board, including our independent Chairman. Accordingly, the Board believes this proposal is unnecessary and implementation of a written consent process would not be in the best interests of the company and its stockholders.

For these reasons, the Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.

 

100    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

88    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.



Other Information for Stockholders

 

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEREPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires directors, and executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC reports of initial ownership and changes in ownership of our equity securities. Based solely upon a review of the reports furnished to us, we believe all of our directors, and executive officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners timely filed all reports they were required to file under Section 16(a) during 2017,2022, except, one grantdue to Jerri F. Dickseskicommunication errors, Edmond E. Hughes, executive vice president and chief human resources officer of 776HII, should have reported the acquisition of 40.934 shares, of common stock and two grants to Mr. Green of 1,14738.120 shares and 2,36239.277 shares were subject to lateupon reinvestments of dividends on a Form 4, filings due to administrative errors.which has since been corrected through a subsequent Form 4 filing.

ATTENDING THE ANNUAL MEETING

OnlyThe annual meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders, which will be conducted exclusively by live webcast. You are entitled to participate in the annual meeting only if you were a stockholder as of the close of business on the record date or their legalyou hold a valid proxy holders are invitedfor the annual meeting. No physical meeting will be held.

You will be able to attend the annual meeting. meeting online and submit your questions prior to and during the meeting by visiting https://meetnow.global/MKKD465. You also will be able to vote your shares online by attending the annual meeting by webcast.

To be admitted toparticipate in the annual meeting, you will need a form of government-issued photo identification. In addition, depending upon how you holdto review the information included in your stock, you may need valid proof of ownership of our common stockNotice, on your proxy card or a valid legal proxy.in the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

If you are a registered stockholder of record, we will be able(i.e., you hold your shares through our transfer agent, Computershare), you do not need to verify your name in our share register with your government-issued photo identification. To be admitted to attend the annual meeting stockholders of record must present a form of government-issued photo identification, which we will match with our share register.
virtually on the Internet. Please follow the instructions in the Notice or proxy card that you received.

If you are a street name stockholder,beneficial holder, meaning an intermediate broker or financial institution holds your shares, you must present a form of government-issued photo identification andregister with Computershare no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on April 27, 2023, to participate in the annual meeting. To register to attend the annual meeting online by webcast, you must submit proof of your ownershipproxy power (legal proxy) reflecting your HII share holdings, along with your name and email address, to Computershare. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy.” You will receive a confirmation of our common stockyour registration by email after Computershare receives your registration materials.

Requests for registration should be directed to Computershare as follows:

By email: Forward the email from your broker, or attach an image of your legal proxy, to legalproxy@computershare.com

By mail:

Computershare

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. Legal Proxy

P.O. Box 43001

Providence, RI 02940-3001

Beneficial holders who cannot obtain a legal proxy or others who wish to attend the record date of March 8, 2018, suchannual meeting may do so as a bankguest by visiting the Internet address provided above, but will not be able to vote or brokerage account statement, to be admitted to the annual meeting.

ask questions.

 

 If you are not a stockholder, you will be admitted to the annual meeting only if you have a form of government-issued photo identification2023 Notice and a valid legal proxy from a stockholder that held our stock as of the record date. If you are receiving a legal proxy from a stockholder of record, you must bring to the meeting the legal proxy from the record holder to you. If you are receiving a legal proxy from a street name stockholder, you must bring to the meeting the legal proxy from the record holder (i.e., the bank, broker or other holder of record) to the street name holder, which must be assignable, and the legal proxy from the street name holder to you. Each stockholder may appoint only one proxy holder to attend the meeting on their behalf.Proxy Statement    101

No cameras, camera phones, weapons, large bags, briefcases, backpacks


Other Information for Stockholders

Questions may be submitted before or packagesduring the annual meeting. To submit a question in advance, visit https://meetnow.global/MKKD465 and enter a valid control number. As many stockholder questions will be permitted inanswered as time permits. We may not respond to questions that are not pertinent to meeting matters or our business. Single responses to a group of substantially similar questions may be provided to avoid repetition. We ask that attendees please help us keep the proceedings orderly and follow the annual meeting and no audio or video recordingrules of the meeting will be permitted.conduct.

Directions to the location of the annual meeting are included on the form of proxy.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

It is our policy that all employees and directors must avoid any activity that conflicts with or has the appearance of conflicting with our business interests. This policy is included in our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. In addition, at least annually, each director and executive officer completes a detailed questionnaire specifying any business relationship that may give rise to a conflict of interest with the company.

Process for Review of Related Person Transactions. The Board has adopted a written policy for the review, approval and ratification of existing or proposed transactions to which the company (or any

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    89


Other Information for Stockholders

subsidiary) is a party, when the aggregate amount involved in the transaction exceeds or is expected to exceed $100,000 and any director, director nominee, executive officer,greater-than-5% beneficial owner or their respective immediate family members had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

The policy provides that the Governance and Policy Committee will review transactions subject to the policy and determine whether or not to recommend that the Board approve or ratify those transactions. In doing so, the Governance and Policy Committee considers whether the transaction is on terms that are no less favorable to the company than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances, the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction, the materiality of the proposed related person transaction, the actual or perceived conflict of interest between the company and the related person, the relationshipapplicability of the proposed transaction to applicable state corporation and fiduciary obligation laws and rules to the proposed transaction, disclosure standards, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and the best interests of the company and our stockholders.

The Governance and Policy Committee has adopted standingpre-approvals under the policy for transactions with related persons.Pre-approved transactions include, but are not limited to:

(a) compensation arrangements of executive officers where (i) the officer’s compensation is reported in the proxy statement or (ii) the executive officer is not an immediate family member of another executive officer, director or nominee for director, the related compensation would have been reported in the proxy statement if the officer was a “named executive officer” and the Compensation Committee approved, or recommended to the Board for approval, such compensation;

(b) director compensation where such compensation is reported in the proxy statement;

(c) transactions in which the related persons interest derives solely from (i) his or her service as a director of another corporation or organization that is a party to the transaction, (ii) his or her beneficial ownership (together with all other related persons) of less than 10% of the equity interest of any firm, corporation or other entity (other than a partnership) or (iii) both clauses (i) and (ii);

(d) transactions in which the related persons interest derives solely from his or her position as a limited partner in a partnership where his or her interest in the partnership (together with all other related persons) is less than 10% and he or she is not a general partner and does not hold any other position with the partnership;

102    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Other Information for Stockholders

(e) transactions with another corporation or organization with respect to which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer) if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1,000,000 or 2% of that corporation’s or organization’s total annual revenues;

(f) charitable contributions, grants and endowments by the company to a charitable organization, foundation or university with respect to which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer), a director or a trustee, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the lessergreater of $1,000,000 or 2% of the charitable organization’s total annual receipts;consolidated gross revenues for the prior fiscal year;

(g) transactions in which the related person’s interest derives solely from his or her ownership of our common stock and all stockholders receive proportional benefits;

(h) transactions involving competitive bids;

(i) regulated transactions; and

(j) certain banking-related services.

90    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


Other Information for Stockholders

The policy requires each director and executive officer to complete an annual questionnaire to identify his or her related interests and persons, and to notify the Office of the Chief Legal Officer of changes in that information. The Office of the Chief Legal Officer receives such information and maintains a master list of related persons, which is incorporated into an internal control designed to identify related person transactions.

Transactions with Related Persons

There have been no related party transactions since the beginning of 20172022 that required disclosure under the securities laws or that otherwise required review, approval or ratification by our Governance and Policy Committee under our related person transactions policy.

 

2023 Notice and Proxy Statement    103

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    91



ANNEX A

 

DEFINITIONS OFNON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

We make reference to “segment operating income,” “adjusted net earnings,” “adjusted diluted earnings per share”“segment operating margin” and “free cash flow.”

We internally manage our operations by reference to “segmentsegment operating income and segment operating margin, which isare not a recognized measuremeasures under GAAP. When analyzing our operating performance, investors should use segment operating income and segment operating margin in addition to, and not as an alternativealternatives for, operating income and operating margin or any other performance measure presented in accordance with GAAP. It is a measureThey are measures that we use to evaluate our core operating performance. We believe that segment operating income, reflectssegment operating margin and shipbuilding operating margin reflect an additional way of viewing aspects of our operations that, when viewed with our GAAP results, providesprovide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business. We believe this measure isthese measures are used by investors and isare a useful indicator to measure our performance. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of segment operating income may not be comparable to a similarly titled measure of other companies.

Adjusted net earnings and adjusted diluted earnings per share are not measures recognized under GAAP. They should be considered supplemental to and not a substitute for financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. We believe these measures are useful to investors because they exclude items that do not reflect our coresegment operating performance. Theymargin may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.

Free cash flow is not a measure recognized under GAAP. Free cash flow has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for analysisnet income as a measure of our resultsperformance or net cash provided by operating activities as reported under GAAP.a measure of our liquidity. We believe free cash flow is an important measure for our investors because it provides them insight into our current andperiod-to-period performance and our ability to generate cash from continuing operations. We also use free cash flow as a key operating metric in assessing the performance of our business and as a key performance measure in evaluating management performance and determining incentive compensation. Free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.

Segment operating incomeis defined as operating income for the relevant segment(s) before the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment andnon-current state income taxes.

Adjusted net earningsSegment operating marginis defined as net earnings adjusted for theafter-tax impactsegment operating income as a percentage of the loss on early extinguishment of debt in fourth quarter 2017sales and for tax reform.service revenues.

Adjusted diluted earnings per shareis defined as adjusted net earnings divided by the weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding.

Free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less capital expenditures net of related grant proceeds.

Operating FAS/CAS Adjustmentis defined as the difference between the service cost component of our pension and other postretirement plan expense underdetermined in accordance with GAAP Financial Accounting Standards(FAS) and the sameour pension and other postretirement expense under U.S. Cost Accounting Standards (CAS). Our pension and postretirement plan expense is charged to our contracts under CAS and included in segment operating income.

Non-current state income taxes are defined as deferred state income taxes, which reflect the change in deferred state tax assets and liabilities and the tax expense or benefit associated with changes in

92    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


ANNEX A

state uncertain tax positions in the relevant period. These amounts are recorded within operating income. Current period state income tax expense is charged to contract costs and included in cost of sales and service revenues in segment operating income.

We present financial measures adjusted for the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment andnon-current state income taxes to reflect the company’s performance based upon the pension costs and state tax expense charged to our contracts under CAS. We use these adjusted measures as internal measures of operating performance and for performance-based compensation decisions.

 

2018 Notice and Proxy Statement    93


ANNEX A

RECONCILIATION OFNON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES TO GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Segment Operating Income, Adjusted Net Earnings and Adjusted Diluted EPS

   

Year Ended

December 31

 

 

  ($ in millions, except per share amounts)

 

  

 

2017

 

   

 

2016

 

 

  Sales and Service Revenues

   7,441    7,068 

  Operating Income

   865    858 

  Operating Margin

   11.6   12.1

  Non-segment factors affecting operating income:

    

  FAS/CAS Adjustment

   (189   (145

  Non-current state income taxes

 

   

 

12

 

 

 

   

 

2

 

 

 

 

  Segment Operating Income

 

  

 

 

 

 

688

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

715

 

 

 

 

 

  Net Earnings

  

 

 

 

479

 

 

  

 

 

 

573

 

 

  Adjustment for loss on early extinguishment of debt1

   14     

  Adjustment for tax expense related to the 2017 Tax Act

   56     

  Adjustment for tax expense related to discretionary pension contributions

 

   

 

7

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

  Adjusted Net Earnings

 

  

 

 

 

 

556

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

573

 

 

 

 

  Diluted Earnings Per Share2

   10.46    12.14 

  Non-cash loss on early extinguishment of debt per share

   0.31     

  Tax expense related to the 2017 Tax Act per share

   1.22     

  Tax expense related to discretionary pension contributions per share

 

   

 

0.15

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

  Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share

 

  

 

 

 

 

12.14

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

12.14

 

 

 

 

1The income tax impact, calculated using the tax rate in effect for the relevantnon-GAAP adjustment, was equal to $8 million in 2017.

2The weighted-average diluted shares outstanding were 45.8 million in 2017 and 47.2 million in 2016.

  Free Cash Flow

  
   

Year Ended

December 31

 

 

  ($ in millions)

 

  

 

2017

 

   

 

2016

 

 

  Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

   814    822 

  Less capital expenditures:

    

  Capital expenditure additions

   (382   (285

  Grant proceeds for capital expenditures

   21    0 

  Free Cash Flow

 

    

 

453

 

 

 

    

 

537

 

 

 

94    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.


104 

            LOGO

    Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.  


ANNEX A

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES TO GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

SEGMENT OPERATING INCOME AND SEGMENT OPERATING MARGIN

   Year Ended
December 31
 
  ($ in millions)  2022   2021 

Sales and Service Revenues

   10,676    9,524 

Operating Income

   565    513 

Operating Margin

   5.3   5.4

Non-segment factors affecting operating income:

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

     Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment

   145    157 

     Non-current state income taxes

   2    13 

Segment Operating Income

   712    683 

Segment Operating Margin

   6.7   7.2

FREE CASH FLOW

   Year Ended
December 31
 
  ($ in millions)  2022   2021 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

   766    760 

Less capital expenditures:

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

     Capital expenditure additions

   (284   (331

     Grant proceeds for capital expenditures

   12    20 

Free Cash Flow

   494    449 

 

Electronic Voting Instructions

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods described below to vote your proxy.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 1, 2018.

Vote by Internet

•  Go towww.envisionreports.com/HII

•  Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

•  Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

  2023 Notice and Proxy Statement     

Vote by telephone

   •   Call toll free1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone

Using ablack ink pen, mark your votes with anX as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.

   •   Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message

105


LOGO

LOGOHII.com


LOGO

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.  q

 A

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the ten nominees for director.

1. 

Elect ten Directors:

 For Withhold   For Withhold   For Withhold         +  
 

 

01 -

 

 

Philip M. Bilden

 

 

 

 

 

 

    02 -

 

 

Augustus L. Collins

 

 

 

 

 

 

    03 -

 

 

Kirkland H. Donald

 

 

 

 

 
 04 - Thomas B. Fargo       05 - Victoria D. Harker       06 - Anastasia D. Kelly   
 07 - C. Michael Petters       08 - Thomas C. Schievelbein       09 - John K. Welch   
 10 - Stephen R. Wilson           

BThe Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR Proposals 2 and 4,AGAINST Proposal 5 and1 YEAR for Proposal 3.

  For Against Abstain    1 Year 2 Years  3 Years  Abstain

 

2.

 

 

Approve executive compensation on an advisory basis.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  3. Select the frequency of future advisory approvals of executive compensation on an advisory basis     ☐
         For  Against  Abstain
4. Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for 2018     5. Stockholder proposal to enable stockholders to take action by written consent     ☐

CAuthorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

Your vote matters – here’s how to vote! You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card. Online Go to www.envisionreports.com/HII or scan the QR code — login details are located in the shaded bar below. Phone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.envisionreports.com/HII Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. Annual Meeting Proxy Card 1234 5678 9012 345 qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the 11 nominees for director. For Against Abstain 1. Election of Directors: 1 - Augustus L. Collins 4 - Victoria D. Harker 7 - Anastasia D. Kelly 10 - Thomas C. Schievelbein For Against Abstain 2 - Leo P. Denault 5 - Frank R. Jimenez 8 - Tracy B. McKibben 11 - John K. Welch For Against Abstain 03—Kirkland H. Donald 06—Christopher D. Kastner 09—Stephanie L. O’Sullivan The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 2 and 3 and AGAINST Proposal 4. 2. Approve executive compensation on an advisory basis 4. Stockholder proposal requesting that HII disclose on its website an annual report of HII’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures For Against Abstain 3. Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for 2023 For Against Abstain Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian or custodian, please give full title.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. C 1234567890 J N T 1UPX 568231


LOGO

      /        /         

IFThe 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. will be held on Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 11:00 A.M. EDT, virtually via the internet at https://meetnow.global/MKKD465. To participate in the virtual meeting, you must have the information that is printed in the shaded bar located on the reverse side of this form. qIF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - D ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.

 LOGO

1  U  P  X

+

                    02SGYA


Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Wednesday, May 2, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. EDT

Herbert H. Bateman Virginia Advanced Shipbuilding and Carrier Integration Center (VASCIC)

2401 West Avenue

Newport News, Virginia 23607

Driving Directions

FromInterstate I-64, takeExit 264 toInterstate I-664 South;

FromI-664, takeExit 6 to26th Street;

Continue on26th Street until it intersects withWest Avenue at a stop sign;

TurnLeft ontoWest Avenue; and then

TurnRight into VASCIC;

Continue into the covered garage for parking.

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q

Proxy — Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

+

Proxy — Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. Notice of 20182023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

The undersigned, having received the Notice of 20182023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, appoints Kellye L. WalkerChad N. Boudreaux and Charles R. Monroe, Jr., and each of them, Proxies with full power of substitution, for and in the name of the undersigned, to vote all shares of common stock of Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. owned of record by the undersigned, and which the undersigned is entitled to vote, in each case on all matters that may come before the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 2018,2023 at 11:00 a.m. EDT, atvirtually via the Herbert H. Bateman Virginia Advanced Shipbuilding and Carrier Integration Center (VASCIC), 2401 West Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 23607,internet, and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

If shares are held on your behalf under any of the Company savings plans, the proxy serves to provide confidential instructions to the plan Trustee, who then votes the shares. Instructions must be received by 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 29, 2018,27, 2023, to be included in the tabulation to the plan Trustee. For shares represented by proxies not received by this date, the applicable plan Trustee will treat the received proxies as instructions to vote the respective plan shares in the same proportion as shares held under the plan for which voting instructions have been received, unless contrary to ERISA.

Shares represented by this proxy will be voted as directed by the stockholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will voteFOR the ten11 nominees for director,FOR Proposals 2 and 4,3 and AGAINST Proposal 5 and1 YEAR for Proposal 3.

4. The Proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

(Items (Items to be voted appear on reverse side.)Non-Voting Items Change of Address — Please print new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below. Meeting Attendance Mark box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. +

DNon-Voting Items
Change of Address — Please print your new address below.Comments— Please print your comments below.Meeting Attendance
Mark the box to the
right if you plan to
attend the Annual
Meeting.

 LOGO

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - D ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.+